<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[I heart Intel. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ROFLROFFLES]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 6:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[so is this what i need to run hl3? roflcakes]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[VeganFreak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 6:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[why would intel compete with the mini.<br>the mini already has a intel chip in it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Giltronic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 6:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Here is a bunch more pictures of the keynote.<br><br><a href="http://ricardosblog.com/blog/2006/09/paul_otellini_idf_keynote_in_p.html" rel="nofollow">http://ricardosblog.com/blog/2006/09/paul_otellini_idf_keynote_in_p.html</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ricardo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 6:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mini killer?  Only if I could put cable cards in it (and upgrade to cable card 2.0 later)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 6:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[10ghz by 2006!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Colin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 7:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[The codenames sound like those were projects at their Israeli facility. Those were the guys that made the Pentium M, which is related to Core Duo, which bodes well for these upcoming CPUs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chua]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 7:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[and i heard amd was working on a dual core to whoop intel (AMD got pwned). hello no one wants 2 dual core chips instead of one quad core chip that means you have to buy 2 zalman heat sinks instad of one... ROTFL AMD are you still among the living]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 7:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wanna know how Apple made the mac mini?<br><br><br>They sacrificed 1,000 orphans, a unicorn, and Steve Jobs' soul. That's how the Mini was made. Don't tell anyone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shirizaki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 7:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Too bad they didn't have to sacrifice Steve Jobs' ego.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dp462090]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 9:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[So according to the picture they are also building mini Death Stars too?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Warhorse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 7:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA["So according to the picture they are also building mini Death Stars too?"<br><br>Yeah, I can see it now...<br><br>*Emperor voice*<br><br>"Oh, I'm afraid this processor will be quite operational when Apple arrives..."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 27th 2006 3:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's not about the speed's anymore. The most important factor is putting more CPU's on a single die. Yes the speed has it's part but an 8 core at 2.2 will always beat a 4 core at 2.8 or similar.<br><br>However if we did happen to see the "80 core" prototype with speeds of around 5 / 6 ghz then my god....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 7:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Rob,<br><br>You're comment that mult-core at a lower clock speed will always beat a single core at a higher clock speed is patently absurd.  Even at the same clock speed, an identically designed (not core 2 vs. P4) single core will have performance benifits resulting from lower overhead requirements.  It's ONLY when two or more threads are running that more cores are faster.  As it is, I'd like to see software manufacturers, microsoft (and open source OS devs), and chip makers come up with a way to allow the user to choose what software runs where.  I'd like all of my "utility" software including the OS, network services, anti-virus, etc... to be limited to one core while my processor intensive apps could spawn on several at a time.<br><br>Your Pal,<br>Matt]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt W]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 27th 2006 9:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[what does Intel have against Apple?<br><br>now that Apple is an Intel customer, this doesn't make much sense to me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 7:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[odd... 80 isnt a power of 2...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 7:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just added comments to pictures. Check them out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ricardo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 7:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[They can offer a bounty for a Mac Mini killer.... but if it looks similar to the Mac Mini, it can't be sold in the U.S. Or should I say, Apple can deny the selling of it (if it looks real close to the Mac Mini) in the U.S.<br><br>Google Apple Mac Mini design patent...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Raider]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 7:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was expecting a 64 core proc... 80 isnt a power of 2]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tau zero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 7:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[yay our CPUs are going to be outdated even faster. now they will be outdated every year or so. wonder how that will work with PC gamers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 8:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[64 + 16 is 80.  Perhaps 64 prime cores and 16 secondary ones?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 8:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[the dailytech article says that it's 8 cores a processor, 80 processors in the wafer (the big thing he's holding up) so I think someone at cnet screwed up with the numbering]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 10:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[I guess soon we'll just have a wafer with pins on one of the sides...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nimajus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 10:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[take THAT ps3! =P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CLShortFuse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 10:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Reading the Anandtech.com review of the IDF, it seems that the 80 cores in Otellini's hands are "weak" cores, capable of excellent floating point operations, but little else (no SSE, SSE2, SSE3, etc.).  For all of the people expecting the 80 core chip to be a 20x scaled up Kentsfield, prepare to be disappointed.  Certainly, having so many cores will increase some operations, but a big push and investment will need to be made on the software side to facilitate optimal utilization of such a massively parallel architecture.  Also, if folks are writing their code to utilize SSE instruction sets and Intel goes with many cores over hard-wired SSE instruction execution, coding will have to change dramatically across the board.  If all you're looking to do is smash the Folding@home records, this baby's a winner!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chaosrain]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 10:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Made is Israel!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[balagan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2006 10:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[AMD is still going to kick Intel's butt with the quad-core due for Q2 2007 release. I mean, ya lower speed, but AMD doubles, almost triples how much data is transfered through Intel's chips. AMD is gonna always woop Intel's ass.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brennan Campbell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 27th 2006 2:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[by data i mean the bus speed]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brennan Campbell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 27th 2006 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice.<br><br>I plan on upgrading my pc in early 07'.  I was thinking of getting dual core...But (depending on the price) I might just go with a quad.<br><br>Its seems clear now, that multi-core processors are here to stay.<br>Looks like Microsoft chose correct with the 360 by doing multiple cores...while the PS3 chose the cell.....BTW, Whats up with the cell?  Is comming to desktops???? or what?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Murc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 27th 2006 1:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel has been trying to sponsor "sexy" computers for ages and nothing has come of it - I think it's just an old habit that will continue.<br><br>The fact that they now have Apple on board, which actually _does_ make sexy small computers doesn't change that one bit. <br><br>Is Apple prohibited from playing in that competition? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[engdgt.10.nikster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 27th 2006 5:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[On a more serious note: That we can now expect the number of cores to double every year - rather than the clock speeds - is very significant for programmers. A lot more thought will go into parralelization.<br><br>With two cores, you don't need to parallelize anything - one core can run all the low priority crap, the other on the main number cruncher program or something like that.<br><br>With 4, that's less true. Maybe we will just get used to background tasks that use way more CPU than the current ones - they would slow down a single core tremendously, but on a quad or 8x, you won't notice at all. Xcept maybe with battery life.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[engdgt.10.nikster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 27th 2006 5:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Murc @ Sep 27th 2006 12:55AM<br><br>...while the PS3 chose the cell.....BTW, Whats up with the cell? Is comming to desktops???? <br><br>The cell processor has 8 cores so i don't see your argument.... the Xbox 360 is lacking only having 2<br><br>I have no idea if it will ever come to PC i guess not, have you ever seen an emotion engine PC?? ;D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 27th 2006 8:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[4 cores and 7 years ...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 27th 2006 8:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Here ya go Matt:<br><br><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/taskman_assign_process.mspx?mfr=true" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/taskman_assign_process.mspx?mfr=true</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[schale_WDI]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 27th 2006 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[core 2 quad, awful, awful name, i already get confused when core duo and core 2 are written close together! what happened to the core quad, and couldn't they just call it the gizentium?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Maff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 27th 2006 8:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Developers Forum roundup: four cores now, 80 cores later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/26/intel-developers-forum-roundup-four-cores-now-80-cores-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[i am having intel D915G processor machine with 256mb RAM ..but iam unable to play any game more than 10 minutes ..after 10 minutes of any game play it gets restarted by itself ...<br>yesterday also when i play WWE RAW , the system restarts itself after 8 minutes....<br>please any person who were all experts in these issues please help me by mailing to the link below<br>MY MAIL ID: rajavignesh2004@yahoo.co.in<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[raja]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 12th 2007 4:59AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
