<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great, so now instead of picking up a wireless headset and knowing it's going to work,  now you have to wonder if it's bluetooth or something else...  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mrfreezie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2006 3:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[:-( You guys suck. I was the one who tipped you off on that like an hour ago. No mention. :-( Next time, I won't go out of my way to help Engadget outttttt. :-( :-(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rohit Kapur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2006 3:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[how much energy does bluetooth actually draw? I dont notice a difference in battery life if I leave my bluetooth on all day (in my cell phone) and use my headset for calls or if I leave it off. I dont see this as worth the transition]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Owen V]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2006 3:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[Let's see, so nokia is offering more efficency but less speed/range. Yippy, lets all start throwing out our obsolete 100watt bulbs and fit spanking new 40watt ones. So what if we can't see to read, it's more efficent. Infact, I'm cancelling my DSL and going back to Dial-Up right now.<br><br>Nokia - "The future is backwards".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Cashman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2006 3:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[Didn't the electric car of the 90's promise similar things?  Can't go as fast, can't go as far, no market penetration, but it gave better power/fuel capabilities.<br><br>You were right on target when you said "It seems like Nokia is gambling pretty hard"...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wonderboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2006 3:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does everybody remember how long it took for Bluetooth to finally start showing up in devices?  It seemed like forever before they hit the market.<br><br>I think makers were wanting it to hit the magical $5 cost to add it to a device before they starting adding it into devices.  I don't know the current build cost, but I would guess it is less than $5.<br><br>If they are pushing a new "standard" they better push hard, quick, and CHEAP or it will die on the vine.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2006 3:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[Another wireless standard?  This is starting to become as bad as memory card formats.<br><br>BT, UWB, Zigbee, and now Wibree.  Crazy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Z]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2006 4:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[WiBro always sounded to me like something from the "men's bra" episode of Seinfeld.  WiBree sounds even worse... Is having a universal standard (BT) really that bad..?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BadBatz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2006 4:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[100m/30ft=10.936<br><br>Let's see 10x less draw but 11x worse range.  Doesn't sound efficent to me at all.<br><br>Not to mention it has only half the bandwidth.  That's another multiplier of 2.  That about makes this technology 22X less efficient than technology already used en mass.  Nice to see R&D funds are being put to good use at Nokia.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2006 4:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thats exaclty what I thought, BadBatz.  I will never buy anything with "Bro" in it cus of that episode.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JWRIGHT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2006 9:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[WHY NOKIA, WHY???????  Stick to designing beautifule S60 phones...not creating shitty standards.  Everyone is getting used to Bluetooth so why the hell create something new that will take years to catch on.  And one more thing... WTF N95 does not have UMTS 1900 for the US of A?????  Obviously they can make Dual band UMTS 850/1900 so why not either dual 2100/1900 or triband.  Device like that would KICK everyone's behind.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2006 4:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[....and its not even april 1st.. had to have a quick look at the calendar..<br>more efficent wifi chips.. none of this "wibree taking the p*** stuff.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[quintron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2006 4:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[Should it be WiBrei - Sounds a bit cheesy]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Cashman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2006 4:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[10x less power drain woulds be a major boon.  Think of bluetooth A2DP headphones (ie hifi headphones). Some of the best ones get only 6 hrs playback time, a deal breaker for me.  Imagine if that were 60 hrs.  Thats an enormous difference in convenience. Think charging once a week, rather than every day. For headphones, headsets, desktop-PPC syncing, pocket to car phone use, the range should be totally fine.<br><br>As for engadget's "huckster" claim:  I don't agree.<br><br>1) Dual chips (BT+WiBree) could be user configurable:  allowing you to turn off one or the other depending upon your peripheral needs. So the power drain advantage could still be there with these chips.<br><br>2) Even if the power advantage were only to be realized in the long term, a transition phase would be worth it in order to get the market there eventually.<br><br>Pete]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete_L_P]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2006 6:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[This sounds like something Sony would try and pull. Seems pretty useless seeing as their is no performance increase and how widespread blue tooth is.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brockmajaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2006 4:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think everyone's missing the point here - it's not designed for devices that already include Bluetooth!<br><br>WiBree is designed for new sectors where using Bluetooth is technically impossible or impractical. Devices that you want to have to recharge every 4 days, like watches and other low-power devices.<br><br>If this gets wireless tech into a broader range of devices and Nokia promotes this as an open standard, which they are, then all power to them.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[eight]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2006 5:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[You said CLASS 1 bluetooth has 100 meters of range, but in OUR nokia phones, we only have about 19 meters of range, which is similar to Wibree's 30 feet range!<br>So if it's battery efficient it's good. But the data rate shouldn't be lower than blootooth.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aakash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 4th 2006 1:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow..<br>I just bought a new mac laptop with bluetooth, and now i have to spend $30 on an an ugly adapter that will be a pain to always plug in, to replace something my computer already has built in?  And that "10X more effiency" is really going to make my laptop battery last longer...  As far as I can tell, leaving bluetooth on makes no change in my battery length anyway!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2006 7:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[Many comments seem to be missing from this article that I read yesterday. Is the website having problems?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jose Cruz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 5th 2006 12:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mike Foley, executive director of the Bluetooth SIG, has posted comments about this his blog at:  <a href="http://programs.bluetooth.org/mikesblog/" rel="nofollow">http://programs.bluetooth.org/mikesblog/</a> ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cvincent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 5th 2006 1:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wibree, Nokia's new standard, to replace Bluetooth]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/wibree-nokias-new-standard-to-replace-bluetooth/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seems like most people replying to this are really concerned about doing what they do. I want to do what I don't know how to do yet. I can think of dozens of ways to use this new capability. HDTV is quite a bit less efficient than NTSC but I love it. My laptop is much less efficient than an NSA server farm, but it's much more usable for me. Nanomanufacturing will be orders of magnitude less efficient than today's manufacturing processes yet orders of magnitude better in many ways -- most of which we can barely imagine and can only recently begin to design. As my Dad would say, Kwityerbitchin unless you know what you're talkin' about.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Smith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2007 8:27PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
