http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/ Engadget Comments for Samsung's 10 megapixel SCH-B600 cameraphone hits for $950 http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/Oct 10th 2006 10:59AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/Oct 10th 2006 12:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/Oct 11th 2006 12:34AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/Oct 10th 2006 2:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/Oct 10th 2006 2:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/
10 megapixels for both.
3x zoom for both.

...which are the specs that REALLY matter for digital cameras.

Plus for this: DMB mobile TV, MP3 player, business card reader, LED autofocus, MMCmicro expansion, TV-out, and EV-DO.

All this in a SMALL AND POCKETABLE SIZE.

Seriously, stop this megapixel madness, stupid.]]>Oct 10th 2006 2:34PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/That's funny, because I thought cameras' main purpose is to take GOOD pictures, not large pictures.]]>Oct 10th 2006 3:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/Oct 10th 2006 3:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/
]]>Oct 10th 2006 5:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/
nuttin about the battery.?]]>Oct 10th 2006 5:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/
who types like that? ...go back to AOL. ...and 1997.]]>Oct 10th 2006 6:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/10/samsungs-10-megapixel-sch-b600-cameraphone-hits-for-950/
It cant be that hard to integrate a quick, bright little flash.

2mp, 10mp, whatever. i'm sure the resulting image will be about the same quality, and to be honest, i prefer the weird crappy images my cameraphone takes. i HAVE a digital camera when i care about quality (and a film camera when i really care.)]]>Oct 10th 2006 6:35PM