http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/ Engadget Comments for WirelessHD group plans to replace cables using 60GHz band http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/Oct 31st 2006 12:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/Nov 1st 2006 9:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/Oct 31st 2006 12:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/Oct 31st 2006 12:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/Oct 31st 2006 12:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/Oct 31st 2006 1:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/Oct 31st 2006 1:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/"The advantages of using SiBEAM's solution is that such chips can use higher power levels"]]>Nov 2nd 2006 9:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/Oct 31st 2006 2:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/Oct 31st 2006 2:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/
The battle between two standards definately gives positive publicity to both sides, and ensures one winner where seperate formats may both have lost.

Case in point: VHS/BetaMax vs Laserdisc, the two similar formats eventually had one winner, whereas the all-around winner in terms of ease of use, reliability, cost of production and features(laserdisc) lost the battle.

There are many formats that only need the financial backing to get them off the ground that would be superior by far to either current HD format. Why do the big companies win, because they are awsome and own whole countries (Sony recently bought zambia and australia).]]>Oct 31st 2006 7:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/31/wirelesshd-group-plans-to-replace-cables-using-60ghz-band/

Laserdisc was a recordable format capable of timeshifting material? news to me. ]]>Nov 1st 2006 12:06AM