http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/ Engadget Comments for Silex announces wiDock wireless iPod dock http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/http://begthequestion.info for more information.]]>Nov 1st 2006 6:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/Nov 1st 2006 6:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/
Plus, to be an environmentally minded sort, using the widock would use more electricity since the dock would, in all certainty, always be plugged in.]]>Nov 1st 2006 6:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/
and yes, what's the big deal about a wire? what they need is a way for one ipod person to give another person's ipod a song for a few days view a sync cord or IR port, yes, IR, you're likely to be right next to the person anyway ]]>Nov 1st 2006 9:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/
Pip pip, cheerio, jolly good rogering, mind your bum and all that!]]>Nov 1st 2006 9:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/
So, I know when I don't like the opinion of a website, I stick around to read it, and even take the time to post a disgusting, unnecessary comment about it. Seriously.

It's people like you that are assisting in the demise of this country. What a waste of space and air.]]>Nov 1st 2006 7:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/Nov 1st 2006 8:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/
- "Am I really the only one that doesn't find plugging my ipod into the sync cable that big of a deal?"

Speaking as a laptop owner, wires make me cry.]]>Nov 1st 2006 8:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/http://www.kilian-nakamura.com/blog-english/?p=217 Although, that site doesn't mention video streaming to TV side of things.]]>Nov 2nd 2006 2:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/http://www.kilian-nakamura.com/blog-english/

and because it is an accessory for an Apple product, it is unassailably cool (now THAT'S begging the question you moronic windows zealot)]]>Nov 1st 2006 11:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/Nov 2nd 2006 12:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/Nov 2nd 2006 8:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/Nov 7th 2006 5:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/01/silex-announces-widock-wireless-ipod-dock/
1+ $149.95
3+ $144.95

http://sewelldirect.com/sliex-widock-wireless-ipod-dock-via-wifi.asp]]>Nov 16th 2006 4:55PM