<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/09/mitsubishis-diamondcrysta-25-5-inch-lcd-monitor/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/09/mitsubishis-diamondcrysta-25-5-inch-lcd-monitor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/09/mitsubishis-diamondcrysta-25-5-inch-lcd-monitor/</guid><description><![CDATA[For $80 more u can get the new Dell 32"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GioNYC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 9th 2006 10:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/09/mitsubishis-diamondcrysta-25-5-inch-lcd-monitor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/09/mitsubishis-diamondcrysta-25-5-inch-lcd-monitor/</guid><description><![CDATA[I never understand a bigger monitor with the same<br>resolution as something 1.5" smaller. Great for ppl<br>with poor vision but this would be a small part of <br>this market No? <br>The 30" 3007wfp dell 2560x1600  is currently $61 cheaper.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WesV]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 9th 2006 12:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/09/mitsubishis-diamondcrysta-25-5-inch-lcd-monitor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/09/mitsubishis-diamondcrysta-25-5-inch-lcd-monitor/</guid><description><![CDATA[The 30" Dell may be cheaper but "professional color reproduction and control" is what your paying for (if the performance meets these claims). If your doing graphics or illustration its somthing you will be greatful to have and wont mind paying for.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[trev]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 9th 2006 3:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/09/mitsubishis-diamondcrysta-25-5-inch-lcd-monitor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/09/mitsubishis-diamondcrysta-25-5-inch-lcd-monitor/</guid><description><![CDATA[This monitor is strictly pro...I remember back in the CRT days you'd see HUGE variances on monitor pricing for the same size, because the high end pro stuff would cost like $1200 while you could get the same size-but not quality-for like $300.<br><br>It's the same thing with this...this is a strictly pro LCD panel.  Of course, unlike back in the CRT days, your pro panel doesn't really have better focus or distortion or convergence, but mostly just the superior color reproduction (supposedly anyway) and contrast.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tekdemon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 9th 2006 4:34PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
