<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Texas e-voting machines count votes three times for good measure</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Texas e-voting machines count votes three times for good measure</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Texas e-voting machines count votes three times for good measure]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</guid><description><![CDATA[E-gads y'all! If it's a Texas problem, why are you showing a picture of Ohio? They're not even close...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vince]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2006 12:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Texas e-voting machines count votes three times for good measure]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, blame it on "user-error" so you're company doesn't have to take the rap for designing crap.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Juaquin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2006 12:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Texas e-voting machines count votes three times for good measure]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</guid><description><![CDATA[You got, you got, you got what I need!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt B]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2006 12:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Texas e-voting machines count votes three times for good measure]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</guid><description><![CDATA[The state pictured behind the ballot is Ohio, not Texas.  If you're studying for any upcoming High School aptitude exams, be sure you're not using the above picture as a study guide.  Those students in Ohio probably wouldn't have had a problem.  Those in Texas, I'm not so sure about.<br><br>(zing!)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evil Closet Monkey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2006 1:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Texas e-voting machines count votes three times for good measure]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</guid><description><![CDATA[Let me guess: it benefited republican candidates, right?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2006 1:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Texas e-voting machines count votes three times for good measure]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you read, it says that it did not change the percentages of the votes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2006 6:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Texas e-voting machines count votes three times for good measure]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's normally the other way around. Democrats have a history of voting fraud.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wilby90]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 19th 2006 3:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Texas e-voting machines count votes three times for good measure]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</guid><description><![CDATA[eGADS! I live and vote in Williamson County Texas.  I wonder if the votes will be RECOUNTED three times.  Maybe my candidates would have won if I had voted more times - in error of course - since voters are being blamed for the triple vote count error.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vinyl Vision]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2006 1:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Texas e-voting machines count votes three times for good measure]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</guid><description><![CDATA[I also live in Williamson County, TX.  I don't know about you, but I filled in dots on good ol' paper ballots.<br><br>...I WAS wondering about those carbon papers attached to the back, though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[masterhibb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2006 3:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Texas e-voting machines count votes three times for good measure]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</guid><description><![CDATA[you used the word myriad incorrectly.  "While a myriad of states" should read "While myriad states."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rithim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2006 2:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Texas e-voting machines count votes three times for good measure]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</guid><description><![CDATA[How f*cking hard is it to design a system that inreases a value when a person selects a certain input?  Does the government hire pre-schoolers to design these systems? f*cking morons! Glad to see my tax dollars at work]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymouse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2006 3:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Texas e-voting machines count votes three times for good measure]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</guid><description><![CDATA[Its pretty sad that the US is not able to learn the IT way. the Election Comission needs to go for a training in India, where there have been two successful elections with the same technology. And it  has been 5 years since the first e-election happened.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Arul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2006 3:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Texas e-voting machines count votes three times for good measure]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</guid><description><![CDATA[i++;<br><br>Man, that was hard.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2006 3:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Texas e-voting machines count votes three times for good measure]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/17/texas-e-voting-machines-count-votes-three-times-for-good-measure/</guid><description><![CDATA[Lemme get this straight - a machine records three votes from the same people and but it's very nature is easily discovered.  How is this worse than a paper ballot that is scanned by a machine that relies on human input to make sure multiple ballots are not cast multiple times?<br><br>Don't get me wrong - there's plenty of room for improvement, but this sort of thing would have easily passed by without the electronic machines.  The best thing we can do as a nation to ensure fair elections would be to require identification at each polling place.  Many simply require you to state you name.  If it's not on the list, you still cast a provisional ballot and hopefully someone checks to make sure it's a legal one and one of a kind.  But there is a particular left leaning political party that refuses to require voter identification.  Hmmmm - I wonder why?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[eflyersteve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2006 3:48PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
