<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Leica announces update plan for buggy M8 digicams</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/25/leica-annouces-update-plan-for-buggy-m8-digicams/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Leica announces update plan for buggy M8 digicams</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leica announces update plan for buggy M8 digicams]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/25/leica-annouces-update-plan-for-buggy-m8-digicams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/25/leica-annouces-update-plan-for-buggy-m8-digicams/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh, come on!, you gotta be kidding me. Six grand and you still have to use a hot mirror filter to get accurate color and block IR? Ridiculous, I thought we were done with that when everyone stopped using the DCS2000. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beanie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 25th 2006 4:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leica announces update plan for buggy M8 digicams]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/25/leica-annouces-update-plan-for-buggy-m8-digicams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/25/leica-annouces-update-plan-for-buggy-m8-digicams/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm a photography professional who's always had a lust for Leica products, but never bought or owned one.<br><br>With that said, if I was a Leica M8 owner, I'd find this solution completely unacceptable. To spend that much money on a camera then be "forced" to use front-lens filters to stop dark shadows / grays / blacks from turning magenta? To have to go through a process of sending my camera in, not having it for weeks or months why Leica does some hack on it to fix the banding issues? <br><br>The only acceptable solution is for Leica to fix these issues permanently and in-camera, and offer a complete replacement, with as little hassles as possible, to early adopters. No filters, no hacks - replace the camera with a new body that completely resolves these issues. <br><br>This is not the Leica of old... this kind of QC wouldn't have passed any kind of scrutiny within the company in the past. That's how they built their rep. This camera may destroy that rep, unless they resolve this the only proper way - fix the issues, and replace the cameras.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 25th 2006 4:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leica announces update plan for buggy M8 digicams]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/25/leica-annouces-update-plan-for-buggy-m8-digicams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/25/leica-annouces-update-plan-for-buggy-m8-digicams/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey guys, I was looking to get a new camera, and was thinking about either a Leica DLX-3 or the Samsung NV10. They both are being reviewed well i think, and both look super sexy, but which one should I pick?<br><br>Thanks in Advance]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 25th 2006 5:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leica announces update plan for buggy M8 digicams]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/25/leica-annouces-update-plan-for-buggy-m8-digicams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/25/leica-annouces-update-plan-for-buggy-m8-digicams/</guid><description><![CDATA[Find it hard to believe that you need to return the camera for a firmware update. Can't this be done online by the users themselves? Come on! My 5 years old canon camera has downloadable, upgradeable firmware in it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian C]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 25th 2006 5:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leica announces update plan for buggy M8 digicams]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/25/leica-annouces-update-plan-for-buggy-m8-digicams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/25/leica-annouces-update-plan-for-buggy-m8-digicams/</guid><description><![CDATA[I bought an R8 waiting for the digital back to materialize. It was going to arrive late, and I took this as a very bad sign selling my setup. If the engineering for a digital back is a larger effort than expected, then my expectations for the basics (image quality) may be more than compromised.<br><br>Leica has half the battle -- lenses -- but needs to find an ergonomic and technological approach which matches the M's... Not easy!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nicholas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 25th 2006 6:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leica announces update plan for buggy M8 digicams]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/25/leica-annouces-update-plan-for-buggy-m8-digicams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/25/leica-annouces-update-plan-for-buggy-m8-digicams/</guid><description><![CDATA[Leica totally blew it, and then they blew it again. However, thanks to Leica's shills, many M8s have been sold. Nope. They won't get their "5 Grand" back.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Granovski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2006 7:47AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
