<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for OQO Model 02 passes through FCC</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for OQO Model 02 passes through FCC</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OQO Model 02 passes through FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've been itching for a UMPC, and if this has all the features and battery life as I expect, I will buy it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GJP303]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2006 4:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OQO Model 02 passes through FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sweet, I want one. <br><br>Speaking of OQO's, where is the next reader meetup being held?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2006 4:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OQO Model 02 passes through FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wait is it vista or xp w/ vista ready or just xp?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2006 4:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OQO Model 02 passes through FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[And it doubles as a handwarmer! ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Veritas II]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2006 4:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OQO Model 02 passes through FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Did anyone find the FCC document? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EnricoFermi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2006 5:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OQO Model 02 passes through FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is it a Core 2 Duo and did they make a deal with Steve to run OS X on it? How it would run Vista without some horsepower is beyond me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nicholas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2006 11:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OQO Model 02 passes through FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[No phone?  Man!  This is killing me!  How much room does the phone radio take up?  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aura Mae]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2006 6:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OQO Model 02 passes through FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Obviously, the big question is how this will compare to the Sony UX280P.  Looks like it will be slightly smaller (but not as much as the 01), and missing the Sony's WWAN.  Keep on the case, Engadget--I want deets on this one!  I'm considering buying something of this form factor...although I'm sure the OQO 02's specs are set, here's what I'd like to see:<br>- Intel Core Solo ULV (competitive with the Sony)<br>- real graphics (competitive with the Sony, necessary for Vista)<br>- better keyboard (backlighting a must)<br>- touchscreen display competitive w/ Sony--I haven't gotten to see a UX in person, but I think I want the higher resolution (1024x600)<br>- 1 Gb RAM<br>- better battery life<br>- cameras are nice but not necessary<br>- don't care about fingerprint scanner<br>- and importantly: undercut Sony's price]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2006 7:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OQO Model 02 passes through FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is it me or does that look like an ibook battery?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2006 6:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OQO Model 02 passes through FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[FCC Link <br><br><a href="https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/cf/eas/reports/GenericSearchResult.cfm?RequestTimeout=500" rel="nofollow">https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/cf/eas/reports/GenericSearchResult.cfm?RequestTimeout=500</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ticktacktoe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2006 6:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OQO Model 02 passes through FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bad link, anyone have the number or a better link?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EnricoFermi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2006 8:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OQO Model 02 passes through FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[GSM modules are about the size of a quarter, as are CDMA]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EnricoFermi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2006 8:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OQO Model 02 passes through FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[none of the links work :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Barbieri]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2006 9:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OQO Model 02 passes through FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hello,<br><br>we can find info about OQO 01, 01+ and 02 model in this links:<br><br><a href="http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/cf/eas/reports/GenericSearch.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/cf/eas/reports/GenericSearch.cfm</a><br>(filling "Applicant name" as OQO)<br><br><a href="http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/cf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Sum&calledFromFrame=N&RequestTimeout=500&application_id=494595&fcc_id='SHD-A4YWFS" rel="nofollow">http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/cf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Sum&calledFromFrame=N&RequestTimeout=500&application_id=494595&fcc_id='SHD-A4YWFS</a>'<br><br>SHD-A4YWFS is the FCC ID for every model.<br><br>Have a nice day,<br>Rafa.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rafa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2006 8:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OQO Model 02 passes through FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm furious at OQO. I bought my Model 15 weeks ago, and it has been having lock-up problems since the day I received it. It's still under the 1-year warranty, so I thought I was covered, right? Well, it turns out that their tech supports is very unreliable. In retrospect, I *should* have returned it within the 30-day money back guarrantee and suffered the 15% restocking fee, but it's far too late for that now.<br><br>I've re-imaged it twice myself, and for the past 15 weeks, have been following OQO tech support's instructions in trying to figure out the issue. I've even sent it in for repair, and all they did was add scratches to it, and send it back to me still broken! I've been paying $60/month on top of that to Sprint, for a device that I cannot use for more than 15 minutes before it locks up!<br><br>Because of all of this, I recently asked for a return-for-credit, or at least allow me to upgrade to the newer model (I offered to pay the difference), but after 20 days, I got denied. They're saying that I'm effectively stuck with this broken unit, but that they're willing to re-image it themselves (never mind that they've already scratched it up)!<br><br>I'm fed up with this. 15 weeks of this is enough. I urge you to heed this warning and STAY AWAY from OQO! Even if you get a unit that works properly right out of the box, if anything goes wrong with it, you're likely to get tremendous headaches dealing with their tech support/customer support.<br><br>Furiously,<br>-Dan.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Bourque]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 19th 2007 3:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OQO Model 02 passes through FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/oqo-model-02-passes-through-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[If anyone's interested, I'll keep updating the full transcripts of my conversations with OQO at: <a href="http://dan.bourque.googlepages.com/oqotroubles" rel="nofollow">http://dan.bourque.googlepages.com/oqotroubles</a><br><br>Cheers,<br>-Dan.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Bourque]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2007 1:25PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>