<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Sarnoff researchers tout GPS fail-safe system</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/sarnoff-researchers-tout-gps-fail-safe-system/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Sarnoff researchers tout GPS fail-safe system</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sarnoff researchers tout GPS fail-safe system]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/sarnoff-researchers-tout-gps-fail-safe-system/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/sarnoff-researchers-tout-gps-fail-safe-system/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now market it to the billionaire spelunking, base-jumping crowd.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mespinosam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2006 6:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sarnoff researchers tout GPS fail-safe system]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/sarnoff-researchers-tout-gps-fail-safe-system/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/sarnoff-researchers-tout-gps-fail-safe-system/</guid><description><![CDATA[ha, sarnoff is literally 30 seconds from my house. it's cool to see talk about them on the web.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fruhtloops514]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2006 7:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sarnoff researchers tout GPS fail-safe system]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/sarnoff-researchers-tout-gps-fail-safe-system/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/sarnoff-researchers-tout-gps-fail-safe-system/</guid><description><![CDATA[i bet it works kind of like an optical mouse - the cameras track the direction and speed of what the cameras are seeing]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Gabriele]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2006 7:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sarnoff researchers tout GPS fail-safe system]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/sarnoff-researchers-tout-gps-fail-safe-system/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/sarnoff-researchers-tout-gps-fail-safe-system/</guid><description><![CDATA[What are the advantages over the conventional inertial navigation found in many GPS-based car navigation systems?<br>Portability?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kaztm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2006 8:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sarnoff researchers tout GPS fail-safe system]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/sarnoff-researchers-tout-gps-fail-safe-system/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/sarnoff-researchers-tout-gps-fail-safe-system/</guid><description><![CDATA[This sounds like an overly complex solution to a problem that's already been solved.  Currently several of the high end garmin units as well as other brand gps units have a dead reckoning accelerometer feature, in addition to a connection to the vehicle's obdc speed output to measure distance. <br><br>One of the methods used way back in the days before gps and before land based radio telemetry systems.... commercial aircraft used a gyroscope system to navigate. I believe i read it had to be set to the airport's lad/lon  everytime the plane left and after a thousand mile round trip on return to the airport it would only be off by 50 feet or so.     I would be suprised if there wasn't an equivalent modern technology  that could be used with electronic accelerometers  (similar to how those suunto / nike / polar running pedometers work with the shoe mounted accelerometer).  <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2006 9:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sarnoff researchers tout GPS fail-safe system]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/sarnoff-researchers-tout-gps-fail-safe-system/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/sarnoff-researchers-tout-gps-fail-safe-system/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why not add (a laser and) a camera beneath a car and record the movement just like a computer mouse?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wouter Schut]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 6th 2006 2:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sarnoff researchers tout GPS fail-safe system]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/sarnoff-researchers-tout-gps-fail-safe-system/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/05/sarnoff-researchers-tout-gps-fail-safe-system/</guid><description><![CDATA["Why not add (a laser and) a camera beneath a car and record the movement just like a computer mouse?"<br><br>Very interesting idea, Wouter.<br>Although several suspects come to mind such as resolution, computational power requirement, cost, and detection of angular velocity, I guess there should be ways to overcome these issues.  Perhaps it IS the way to go...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kaztm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 6th 2006 3:46AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
