http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/07/palm-licenses-palm-os-garnet-source-code-from-access/ Engadget Comments for http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/07/palm-licenses-palm-os-garnet-source-code-from-access/http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/07/palm-licenses-palm-os-garnet-source-code-from-access/
But I still don't get why Pauls continues to bash anyone for anything that they do... By the way he wrote this posts you would think that a linux based os is a bad thing. ]]>Dec 7th 2006 10:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/12/07/palm-licenses-palm-os-garnet-source-code-from-access/http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/07/palm-licenses-palm-os-garnet-source-code-from-access/
HEY PALM, a $600 phone should not reset every other day or more often. Oh, and thanks for doing the quality R&D on the 700p that included several steps backward. You are becoming an INCOMPETENT company.

Hi HTC how are you today...]]>Dec 7th 2006 11:41AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/12/07/palm-licenses-palm-os-garnet-source-code-from-access/http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/07/palm-licenses-palm-os-garnet-source-code-from-access/
I'm no palm fanboy, since I've been using a Samsung i730 with windows mobile for over a year, and am sufficiently satisfied to stay put until EV-DO Rev A comes along. Given the likely release dates for Rev A devices, I'll probably get a windows mobile Rev A device as well. I've had a Treo 650 before that, and still support them now.

In my personal experience, the Treos were MUCH, MUCH more stable than my i730 with Win Mobile 3, and poles on pdaPhoneHome says the i730 is even LESS stable (much, much less stable) with win mobile 5.

Pete]]>Dec 7th 2006 5:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/12/07/palm-licenses-palm-os-garnet-source-code-from-access/http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/07/palm-licenses-palm-os-garnet-source-code-from-access/
Hmm, I guess that makes sense to somebody at Palm.]]>Dec 7th 2006 11:42AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/12/07/palm-licenses-palm-os-garnet-source-code-from-access/http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/07/palm-licenses-palm-os-garnet-source-code-from-access/Dec 7th 2006 3:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/12/07/palm-licenses-palm-os-garnet-source-code-from-access/http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/07/palm-licenses-palm-os-garnet-source-code-from-access/Dec 7th 2006 11:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/12/07/palm-licenses-palm-os-garnet-source-code-from-access/http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/07/palm-licenses-palm-os-garnet-source-code-from-access/
Also, I want to see more downloadable OS updates. It's ridiculous that they expect you to buy a new Treo every time they come out with an OS upgrade. That's like buying a new computer every time a Windows service pack comes out.]]>Dec 7th 2006 11:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/12/07/palm-licenses-palm-os-garnet-source-code-from-access/http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/07/palm-licenses-palm-os-garnet-source-code-from-access/
I hope I don't ever hear Palm complain about Microsoft taking over the mobile phone and PDA market. Palm has pretty much handed it to them on a silver platter. :(

I'd like to someday be able to replace my Treo 650 with a phone running ALP, but I'm not sure if that day will come, considering Palm's obsession with 1990's technology.
]]>Dec 7th 2006 2:49PM