<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Etymotic's boxy ety8 Bluetooth earbuds get reviewed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Etymotic's boxy ety8 Bluetooth earbuds get reviewed</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Etymotic's boxy ety8 Bluetooth earbuds get reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[hopefully we will be able to look back and laugh at how absurd the 1st gen wireless in-ear buds looked.<br><br>good on 'em for having a go though, someones gotta take the first step.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tsubie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2006 12:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Etymotic's boxy ety8 Bluetooth earbuds get reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[The bluetooth headsets made by Southwing are far more attractive than these.  Southwing actually looks like regular headphones that go around the back of your head and they're only $99.95 from Cingular.  They last for 14 hours!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Failedgrace]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2006 8:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Etymotic's boxy ety8 Bluetooth earbuds get reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I usually object to use of the term "cans" to refer to earbuds -- it doesn't make sense for in-ear phones -- but in this case it looks entirely appropriate. Man those things are ugly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2006 1:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Etymotic's boxy ety8 Bluetooth earbuds get reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't know. Maybe I'm just getting old. But [1] $100-$300 for a pair of headphones??? and [2] for an MP3 player? <br><br>What? Is the MP3 player too heavy and bulky to carry around that you have to put it down? If I'm away from home, I'm not putting my MP3 player down and walking 30' away from it, much less 5 feet. And if I'm at home, I'm using my receiver, not my MP3 player.<br><br>What's that? Oh, a gray hair. :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NHAnimator]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2006 2:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Etymotic's boxy ety8 Bluetooth earbuds get reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[are you able to use two headphones with the adaptor? that would be cool sharing your music with someone else when your on a plane or bus or somthing ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2006 5:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Etymotic's boxy ety8 Bluetooth earbuds get reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm sorry, but my money is more likely to be spent on a pair of Shure earphones.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2006 3:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Etymotic's boxy ety8 Bluetooth earbuds get reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nano + Apple Lanyard are probably a better idea.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alric Lopez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2006 3:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Etymotic's boxy ety8 Bluetooth earbuds get reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't get  your relentless criticism and the lemmings that echo you with their postings. Just step back and think for a minute.<br><br>These are state of the art Bluetooth headphones, a twentieth the size of anything else, small enough to fit in your pocket, with fidelity unmatched by anything else, at a price less than comparable performing wired headsets from Shure and Etymotic themselves. And all you can do is keep trashing their looks! They are the same shape as an ipod, a rectangle with rounded corners. That's pretty contemporary to me. Would you prefer them to be round? Give these guys a break. It seems you just don't get it and are trying to be humorous. Frankly you come across as being more boorish.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2006 4:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Etymotic's boxy ety8 Bluetooth earbuds get reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Logitech's FreePulse = $99 down the toilet.  Easily the least comfortable headphones I've ever owned, connection issues (unless you keep the iPod on your right side, always), and dead batteries after sitting in my bag unused all day.  Feh, I say.  Feh!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dalton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2006 4:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Etymotic's boxy ety8 Bluetooth earbuds get reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Massively Ugly. If they were somewhat ugly, it'll be ok. But those are beyond ugly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2006 12:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Etymotic's boxy ety8 Bluetooth earbuds get reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/08/etymotics-boxy-ety8-bluetooth-earbuds-get-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[fair call phil, it IS easy to slag something off because it doesnt look perfect but the reviewers themselves brought up the issue and im fairly sure that every review that folows will to, so its not like we are imagining it.<br><br>its like the first gen oakley thump sunnies - laughable first attempt but a nice try.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tsubie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2006 3:56AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
