<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Samsung's (not quite) "Full HD" 22-inch LCD TV: FTW?</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Samsung's (not quite) "Full HD" 22-inch LCD TV: FTW?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's (not quite) "Full HD" 22-inch LCD TV: FTW?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow looks quite big for 22' O_o]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ali]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 9:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's (not quite) "Full HD" 22-inch LCD TV: FTW?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</guid><description><![CDATA[What an odd resolution. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Lyon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 9:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's (not quite) "Full HD" 22-inch LCD TV: FTW?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</guid><description><![CDATA[I believe 1680x1050 is SXGA.  My 15" ASUS notebook has the same resolution.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 10:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's (not quite) "Full HD" 22-inch LCD TV: FTW?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is it really that much different than 42" plasmas that are 1024x768 being called 720p?<br>/snark]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pete]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 10:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's (not quite) "Full HD" 22-inch LCD TV: FTW?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</guid><description><![CDATA[It is becuase those displays have a higher resolution, not a lower one]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KineticOnline]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 11:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's (not quite) "Full HD" 22-inch LCD TV: FTW?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</guid><description><![CDATA["You! How much for your wife? Ha ha ha ha ha!"<br><br>...I w4nt to go to Asia just for th3 unbelievably h0t w0m3nz.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ali]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 10:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's (not quite) "Full HD" 22-inch LCD TV: FTW?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually 720p is 1280x720.  So the 1024x768 aren't 720p in regards to the horiz but pass it in the vert.  But they are "close enough" to be called 720p.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Heath Stahl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 11:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's (not quite) "Full HD" 22-inch LCD TV: FTW?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</guid><description><![CDATA[hah that's interesting.  i'm already running that setup with the Westinghouse 22" LCD from Best Buy on Black Friday.  it also has component, s-video, composite, and dvi connections.  it's 1680x1050 native, hooked up a 360 through vga at 1920x1080 and it looks absolutely gorgeous.  only downside is that i had to adjust it and now i'm missing 5% of viewing area from each side due to aspect ratio differences.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dynamius]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 12:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's (not quite) "Full HD" 22-inch LCD TV: FTW?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</guid><description><![CDATA[There's a monitor in that photo?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NeoteriX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 12:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's (not quite) "Full HD" 22-inch LCD TV: FTW?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seriously, is that a 22" monitor there? Looks bigger]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomppa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 12:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's (not quite) "Full HD" 22-inch LCD TV: FTW?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</guid><description><![CDATA[>Seriously, is that a 22" monitor there? Looks bigger<br><br>Compare the monitor to the 360 in the pic, not the girl. She's tiny. And hot. 22" widescreen monitors seem huge compared to 19" ones...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Blindelf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 12:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's (not quite) "Full HD" 22-inch LCD TV: FTW?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't compare its size to the girl, she is tiny :P Compare with the big fat 360]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 12:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's (not quite) "Full HD" 22-inch LCD TV: FTW?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</guid><description><![CDATA[Off topic, but what's with all the "l33t speak" around here lately?  First it was using "dropped" for new products and now you're using "FTW" too?  If bloggers want to be taken seriously as journalists they need to start writing like them.<br><br>Okay, rant over.<br>Jeff (who has been tech blogging for 9+ years at dcresource.com)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Keller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 2:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's (not quite) "Full HD" 22-inch LCD TV: FTW?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm gonna have to call "shenanigans" on that photo.  Everyone knows there are no Xbox 360s in Asia. ;-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Galley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 5:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's (not quite) "Full HD" 22-inch LCD TV: FTW?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</guid><description><![CDATA[galley i was thinking the same thing but hey they know deep down inside ps3 and its ability to run linux sux thats why they have a 360 to later run homebrew with xna and really run linux with graphics chip access]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pcbuilderchris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 6:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's (not quite) "Full HD" 22-inch LCD TV: FTW?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm enjoying this at 1280 x 800 on my macbook, I didn't realise I was browsing in HD!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David G]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 9:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's (not quite) "Full HD" 22-inch LCD TV: FTW?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks like she needs a playing partner if you know what I mean.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 9:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's (not quite) "Full HD" 22-inch LCD TV: FTW?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/14/samsungs-not-quite-full-hd-22-inch-lcd-tv-ftw/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you think females in asia are all hot, you definitely got to get out more. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ConceptVBS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 15th 2006 10:22AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
