<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/15/wiquest-launches-two-new-uwb-based-widv-chipsets-for-wireless-hd/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/15/wiquest-launches-two-new-uwb-based-widv-chipsets-for-wireless-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/15/wiquest-launches-two-new-uwb-based-widv-chipsets-for-wireless-hd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Somebody should make wireless connections for TV's, receivers, and components.  How sweet would it be to get a new receiver, shove it in the hole where the old one was, and then sync everything up in "universal remote-esque" manner?  No need to get behind the old entertainment center and fiddle with all of the connections.  Just set it down, plug it in, punch in some codes, and everything works!  That would be neato.<br><br>Then they should work on wireless electricity.<br><br>Then they should make everything float so you don't need an entertainment center.<br><br>Then they should make Jessica Alba come to my house and love me.<br><br>That's about the right order that might happen in, right?  Happy Friday! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 15th 2006 5:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/15/wiquest-launches-two-new-uwb-based-widv-chipsets-for-wireless-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/15/wiquest-launches-two-new-uwb-based-widv-chipsets-for-wireless-hd/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/41/wec.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/41/wec.shtml</a><br><br>Jessica's calling, she wants to see your new floating tv]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 16th 2006 12:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/15/wiquest-launches-two-new-uwb-based-widv-chipsets-for-wireless-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/15/wiquest-launches-two-new-uwb-based-widv-chipsets-for-wireless-hd/</guid><description><![CDATA[1 Gbps is not enough for transporting uncompressed full HD video. So, scaling 'up to' means a gross shortfall. Of course, if they were talking about directv's hdlite then it most certainly could. lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GhostDoggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 16th 2006 7:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/15/wiquest-launches-two-new-uwb-based-widv-chipsets-for-wireless-hd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/15/wiquest-launches-two-new-uwb-based-widv-chipsets-for-wireless-hd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Holy crap, wireless electricity!  And Jessica is coming over tonight!  There IS a God!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 16th 2006 5:08PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>