<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[A resource of VOIP is at <a href="http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/VoIP.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.1-satellite-tv-facts.com/VoIP.html</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lawrence]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2008 5:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Recently i unlocked my 3GS 3.1.2 iphone and i want to know if its safe, i used <a href="http://www.unlock-iphone.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.unlock-iphone.org</a> , please tell me if its safe]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[danny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 6th 2009 2:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yea, this sounds like that phone mentioned on Gizm*do... those guys are sneaky iFuckers.<br><a href="http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.laptopbatteryclub.com/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lulianping]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 2nd 2009 7:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dammit!<br><br>Brian Lam fucked with us again!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Demi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 12:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Funny...I thought apple owned www.iphone.org<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elwynn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 12:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Aaaah! everyone yell at cisco to give the name back to apple, even though they had the tm :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 12:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Funny enough, try searching for iPhone on google and hit "I'm Feeling Lucky". It takes you to what looks like apple.com, but, look at the url...<br><br>The iPhone looks to be real, but, it looks like it's called...<br><br>eWorld.<br><br>-S]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 1:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[iChat Mobile, anyone?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[varun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 1:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[quick, copyright it if it hasn't been already!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chenry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 12:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[One step further...eworld.com is registered to...<br><br>Registrant:<br>Apple Computer, Inc. (DOM-1423713)<br>1 Infinite Loop Cupertino, CA 95014 US<br><br>Domain Name: eworld.com<br><br>Registrar Name: Markmonitor.com<br>Registrar Whois: whois.markmonitor.com<br>Registrar Homepage: <a href="http://www.markmonitor.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.markmonitor.com</a><br><br>Administrative Contact:<br>Kenneth Eddings (KE557) (NIC-14211601) Apple Computer, Inc.<br>1 Infinite Loop M/S 60-DR Cupertino CA 95014 US<br>eddingsk@apple.com +1.4089744286<br>Technical Contact, Zone Contact:<br>NOC Apple (NA4189-ORG) (NIC-14211609) Apple Computer, Inc.<br>1 Infinite Loop M/S 60-DR Cupertino CA 95014 US<br>Apple-NOC@APPLE.COM +1.4089961010 Fax- +1.4089741560<br><br>Created on..............: 1994-Jan-03.<br>Expires on..............: 2009-Jan-01.<br>Record last updated on..: 2006-Dec-01 04:08:07.<br><br>Domain servers in listed order:<br><br>NSERVER.APPLE.COM	<br>NSERVER2.APPLE.COM	]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[doyouflip]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 1:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[im not exactly sure what you're getting at but if you search iphone normally on google then ~ the third link down is a company,<br><a href="https://iphone.nuvio.com/html/" rel="nofollow">https://iphone.nuvio.com/html/</a><br>that i'm assuming is owned by cisco per ryan's article<br><br>its a bummer the applephone won't be called the iPhone]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 1:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[a nice theory, but there's a logical explanation.<br><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EWorld" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EWorld</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jopari]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 1:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[So this is what Giz___ was talking about when they said the iPhone would be announced on Monday????<br><br>Arrrgggghhhhhh.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Little Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 1:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Long live the ApplePhone! Maybe we should just all it the aPhone for short.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just one problem: say I'd like aPhone for my birthday and you don't really know what you'll get.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gabe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 4:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA["the Applephone (which is what we'll henceforth be calling it)"<br><br>Not iTalk?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ocelot67]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 2:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Note, the eworld name has been dead for some time. They still own the rights. They could absolutely re-use it at any time, whether it be the carrier for their new phone, or the new phone (more likely PDA) itself...<br><br>I'm not really hinting at anything, HOWEVER, I know that as of midnight tonight, here on the east coast, a google "iPhone" search directed me to eWorld.com (apple.com). Before midnight the iPhone search NEVER took me to apple.com and it certainly never took me to a page that LOOKS like apple.com but was called eWorld.com...<br><br>I don't think that's a coincidence.<br><br>-S]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 1:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Um, why would Apple dilute the iPod brand.<br><br>I always figured it was going to be officially branded as the iPod Phone.  You know, Nano, Video, Phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aiken]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 1:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmm... makes you think, do people really care? Seriously. Apple is a bad company. The worst warranty I've seen since warranty void.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 1:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why not call it the iPhonepod?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[izopod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 1:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[do you listen to buzz out loud?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GJP303]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2006 6:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Either iPod or Mac.  MacBook, MacPhone? <br><br>iPod Mobile... iPod Cell... iPod Talk?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 2:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yea, this sounds like that phone mentioned on Gizm*do... those guys are sneaky iFuckers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[humpty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 2:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[iPod Mobile? Or if it is indeed based on a lite version of Mac OS X, maybe it could be called MacPod or MacPhone? Now, I would not be surprised if Steve came up with a totally unexpected and totally cool new name that says "hey, this is so much more than just a phone".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jean-Michel Decombe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 2:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[I suspected it would be called iPod Phone or something. As someone else already mentioned, it makes no sense to ignore the already successful brand...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Baldwin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 4:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[PWNED!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PPC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 2:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[gawker sucks, this lame ass *joke* proves it]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cotdc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 2:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cisco probably thought that iPhone would be a really lame name... But then some Apple fanboy within Cisco annoyed the hell out of everyone until they finally created a product by that name.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgdfgdfdfgdfg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 9:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Poor Apple... I laugh at them.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Intrepid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 2:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[I quite liked the idea of calling it the 'aPhone' mentioned earlier. Perhaps we could call people who jump on the bandwagon and snap it up aHoles?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BabyDinosaur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 3:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[These things (and especially that base station) run Linux, right?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Julian Bond]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 3:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[new names for the Apple Phone:<br><br>PhonePod<br>CellPod<br>iCell<br>iTalk<br>iPod Talk<br>PortaPod?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erik Childs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 4:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[ApplePhone is the worlds longest word. I'm sure they'll find something shorter.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tech^Cellfish]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 4:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[iPwned!<br><br>i like applephone, because it makes me think of BANANAPHONE.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nick botulism]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 5:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Too bad there aren't like "regular expression trademarks"... then Apple could have trademarked i[A-Z][a-z]+<br><br>But then what's stopping someone from trademarking [a-zA-Z]+ ...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Robinson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 5:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple bitches are in a pansy cus Cisco struck  a blow to thier iPhone. Hahahaha. Get a life losers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[3rdsun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 5:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[By the way... anyone else notice a strong resemblance  to the Sony Ericsson T610/T630 phones...<br><br><a href="http://img166.imageshack.us/my.php?image=ciscovssonyericssonrz0.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img166.imageshack.us/my.php?image=ciscovssonyericssonrz0.jpg</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Robinson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 5:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would have though the more obvious parallel was the second white phone being a dead ringer (no pun intended) for the Sony Ericsson w800i. Whats next Cisco...'Talkman' branded phones with a Pear logo?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Archietype]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 8:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[IS it gonna be a linksys or a cisco...<br><br>also i found this a few weeks ago<br><br>It seems like comwave already has trademarked the iphone name with one of their products:<br><br><a href="http://www.comwave.net/US/iPhone/whatisiphone.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.comwave.net/US/iPhone/whatisiphone.htm</a><br><br>Anyone know anything about this?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris C]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 7:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have to ask…has Apple ever called this project the iPhone? Wasn’t this just made up by the blogosphere and then used by reports from WSJ and then it trickled to everyone else?<br><br>I never thought Apple would ever name it somethin as unimaginative as iPhone.<br><br>Am I totally off here?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carlos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 8:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[the device: iCall<br>the software: iDial<br><br>i'd love to see apple offer a voip option that uses leftover 1g shuffle casings (like the vonage usb device) in addition to a regular 3g phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wahoo scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 8:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Congrats, Engadget.. for not building up a run-of-the-mill story just to get people to visit your website, you are now the main tech blog I'm reading.  All thank you e-mails should be sent to Gizmodo, care of Brian "My Journalistic Integrity Is Non-Existent" Lam.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cap]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 9:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Guys, seriously.<br><br>"Don't call us a phone company, don't call it a phone..." --Helio commercials<br><br>What the hell makes you guys think Apple's gonna call it an iPhone? Not like we have iMusics, iLaptops (RIP), etc. But you get my point? It'll probably be called like iPod Mobile or iCell (doubtful, but you get my point). Hell, MacPhone maybe. If I knew what the damn thing looked like I would have a better idea but it'll probably be named somewhat for it's shape or design.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Smith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 9:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe I am missing something but I don't get these offerings from Linksys.<br>All the wireless phones come with some sort of base station WiFi controller (or so it seems). Why? A lot of us have a WiFi set upo already so the best Slype solution is something like a rival to Netgear's more simple WiFi phone that connects thru ANY wifi and does not need a new base station. So what's so clever about these new Linksys offerings? What am I missing?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Jardine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 10:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is why I only read Engadget now. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Uram]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 10:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[what about "The Bannana" by Apple?<br>First run would all be yellow.  I like it.<br>Of couse if it isn't any good it will be dubbed the rotten bannana.  I think the whole "i" thing is run its course anyways.  iDon't pay attention to it anymore.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tnriverfish]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 11:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sweet lookin' phone. Has Logitech ever made anything that wasn't gorgeous? Seriously.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 11:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[...except that isn't Logitech. Duh. So, uhm, yeah, those were just two unrelated comments which are perfectly valid if taken seperately.<br><br>Oops.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 11:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree with the line of thinking someone posted earlier:<br>iPod:<br>Video<br>Nano<br>Shuffle<br>Phone<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 12:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cisco -- not apple -- announces iPhone branded VoIP phones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/</guid><description><![CDATA[You know... Apple doesn't have the 'i' on everything. What if they just dropped the 'i' altogether and simply called it 'phone', or, if needed, 'iFone', just for the "fun factor". <br>But, I highly doubt that iPhone would've ever had been used. It's highly unoriginal. The only one with the 'i' branding that I've liked is iSight, because it sounds relevant. iSight = eyeSight<br>But, if they did have that unoriginal idea of iPhone, then I agree with 19. PWND!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Liqwid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2006 12:02PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>