<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for NEC, Samsung stacking flash in hopes of a one-terabit chip</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for NEC, Samsung stacking flash in hopes of a one-terabit chip</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC, Samsung stacking flash in hopes of a one-terabit chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA["32 bits"? So that would be what, 4 bits per chip?<br>Wow, early stages indeed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kibi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2006 5:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC, Samsung stacking flash in hopes of a one-terabit chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[aa665bf5]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[artard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2006 5:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC, Samsung stacking flash in hopes of a one-terabit chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[Zmg someone haxx0r my acc with my pass.<br><br>There going to fit 120gig on 4bit chip's, So, uhh. be it 30 year's till release date?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[artard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2006 5:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC, Samsung stacking flash in hopes of a one-terabit chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't be an idiot, you know they meant gigabytes...<br><br>Or Maybe I'm the idiot, in which case, "This is, like, soooo 30 years agoo!!!1]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2006 6:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC, Samsung stacking flash in hopes of a one-terabit chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[In my day, we used to dream of 64k...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry Pratchett]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2006 6:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC, Samsung stacking flash in hopes of a one-terabit chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not even worth doing an "I, for one..."<br><br>I think we've all learnt what artard's password used to be, though. Must be so easy to type it in the "comments" box instead of the "password" one, eh?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[timetex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2006 6:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC, Samsung stacking flash in hopes of a one-terabit chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, but i'm an Artard, ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[artard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2006 7:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC, Samsung stacking flash in hopes of a one-terabit chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[The entire season of LOST already does fit in some cell phones]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hitesh Sawlani]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2006 7:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC, Samsung stacking flash in hopes of a one-terabit chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[Artard, a security tip: don't post your password in public forums.  Have a nice day.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2006 7:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC, Samsung stacking flash in hopes of a one-terabit chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[128 Gigs on a flash drive.. daaaaaamn.. that's a lot of porn to fit into a cell phone...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2006 7:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC, Samsung stacking flash in hopes of a one-terabit chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[BAH!  Does anyone actually read articles these days?  I've seen some posts where I'm pretty sure even Engadget didn't read the article.  Or in this case, post the proper link.  The image/link leads to page 2 of the article, smooth guys.<br><br>Anyway, go read the damned article before posting.  It's not about getting more bits on a chip.  It's about a new fabrication process to fit several layers of silicon together and get them working as one.  Making each layer of the chip hold a few trillion bits is the easy part, but they're testing with just 32bits/chip for now just to make sure the structure and fabrication process works.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Isaac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2006 8:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC, Samsung stacking flash in hopes of a one-terabit chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/19/nec-samsung-stacking-flash-in-hopes-of-a-one-terabit-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[Isn't this the type of chip used in the 'Terminator'? Be afraid. Be very afraid...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nachoNY]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2006 2:43PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
