http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/researchers-develop-metamaterial-with-negative-refractive-index/ Engadget Comments for http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/researchers-develop-metamaterial-with-negative-refractive-index/http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/researchers-develop-metamaterial-with-negative-refractive-index/
...every man dreams, right?]]>Dec 20th 2006 4:38AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/researchers-develop-metamaterial-with-negative-refractive-index/http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/researchers-develop-metamaterial-with-negative-refractive-index/http://www.ee.duke.edu/~drsmith/about_descartes.htm and http://www.nanotechnology.bilkent.edu.tr/research%20areas/metamaterials.htm]]>Dec 20th 2006 8:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/researchers-develop-metamaterial-with-negative-refractive-index/http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/researchers-develop-metamaterial-with-negative-refractive-index/Dec 20th 2006 12:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/researchers-develop-metamaterial-with-negative-refractive-index/http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/researchers-develop-metamaterial-with-negative-refractive-index/Dec 20th 2006 3:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/researchers-develop-metamaterial-with-negative-refractive-index/http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/researchers-develop-metamaterial-with-negative-refractive-index/
Still, this research is fairly dated. Boo, Engadget.]]>Dec 20th 2006 10:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/researchers-develop-metamaterial-with-negative-refractive-index/http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/researchers-develop-metamaterial-with-negative-refractive-index/http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/06/Srgbspectrum.png I have an IR-filter in my camera which lets through radiation beginning from 720, which is only a fraction of red light. The filter is totally black.
And what is "finer than the wavelength of visible light"? Ultraviolet? X-ray? I thought we covered those wavelengths already. Or did they mean with our eyes? Good luck to that.]]>Dec 21st 2006 3:54AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/researchers-develop-metamaterial-with-negative-refractive-index/http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/researchers-develop-metamaterial-with-negative-refractive-index/Hmmmmmmm!!!]]>Dec 21st 2006 12:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/researchers-develop-metamaterial-with-negative-refractive-index/http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/researchers-develop-metamaterial-with-negative-refractive-index/I mean will the sheet of the metamaterial be hiding something behind it or will the sheild itself be invisible?

so as far as every mans dream goes... does this mean you walk into the ladies room cloaked in something that isnt there?

This may be the star trek age but the clingons havent arrived yet.

PS : Ive got a whole bag of stuff thats invisible that Im willing to sell. ]]>Jan 1st 2007 9:16PM