<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for V7 kicks out budget 22-inch R22W02 LCD monitor</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for V7 kicks out budget 22-inch R22W02 LCD monitor</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on V7 kicks out budget 22-inch R22W02 LCD monitor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</guid><description><![CDATA[1,650 x 1,050 resolution is 16:10 not 16:9 aspect ratio.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dirty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 20th 2006 11:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on V7 kicks out budget 22-inch R22W02 LCD monitor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</guid><description><![CDATA[Acer AL2223Wd is cheaper and probably better. ($325 at Newegg)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brewin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2006 12:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on V7 kicks out budget 22-inch R22W02 LCD monitor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</guid><description><![CDATA[the pixels don't necessarily have to have a 1:1 aspect ratio.   they could have some other rectangular shape to make 1650x1050 be 16:9]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2006 1:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on V7 kicks out budget 22-inch R22W02 LCD monitor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</guid><description><![CDATA[...and what are you smoking?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2006 1:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on V7 kicks out budget 22-inch R22W02 LCD monitor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</guid><description><![CDATA[Correct me if I'm wrong (Which is highly possible), but I believe NTSC standard in fact uses slightly rectangular pixels - So It's probably not that far-fetched.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Deluxe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2006 3:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on V7 kicks out budget 22-inch R22W02 LCD monitor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</guid><description><![CDATA[NTSC [and PAL] doesn't use square pixels (hence why NTSC DV is 720x480, but 4:3 at 480 lines is 640x480). Computer monitors, as well as ATSC HD I believe, use 1:1 square pixels; I've never seen a widescreen computer monitor that is truly 16:9 with square pixels. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think they are all 16:10 (seen in 1280x800 laptop screens, 1680x1050 monitors, 1920x1200, etc)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacques67]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2006 3:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on V7 kicks out budget 22-inch R22W02 LCD monitor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://larscapes.com/photo/skyline_at_night_frankfurt" rel="nofollow">http://larscapes.com/photo/skyline_at_night_frankfurt</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[derek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2006 3:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on V7 kicks out budget 22-inch R22W02 LCD monitor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</guid><description><![CDATA[Prior to this being posted, I was considering this monitor anyway as the specs seemed pretty good to me and the price is very good comparitively speaking - $370 in Canada (<a href="http://www.handheldcanada.com/netCoreWebRequest/handheld/UserShowProductDetail?productId=165139" rel="nofollow">http://www.handheldcanada.com/netCoreWebRequest/handheld/UserShowProductDetail?productId=165139</a>). The post in usual Engadget, sarcastic style throws me off a bit - are the specs that bad? Resolution seems good, 5ms seems very good and 300cd brightness should be fine for most environments - no?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[O Taylor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2006 5:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on V7 kicks out budget 22-inch R22W02 LCD monitor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</guid><description><![CDATA[16:10...16:10...16:10...<br><br>Seriously you guys need to do some math.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tekdemon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2006 5:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on V7 kicks out budget 22-inch R22W02 LCD monitor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/v7-kicks-out-budget-22-inch-r22w02-lcd-monitor/</guid><description><![CDATA[The display's aspect ratio and the pixel aspect ratio are two different things.  Especially when dealing with LCDs, the pixels are usually about 5:4 ratio, since they are made up of 3 sub-pixels (R,G,B).  That's also partly why TV-output is a little fuzzy, since the image must be scaled proportionally to fit the TV screen, so pixels no longer have a 1:1 ratio.<br><br>All this to say, if they say it's a 16:9 panel, then it's a 16:9 panel no matter what the resolution is.  You could build a 16:9 panel that runs in 320x200, you'd just have really wide pixels.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Billco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 27th 2007 1:02AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
