<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Steve needs to let that beard grow for a month or two! Get in touch with his roots a little..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonhimslf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 30th 2006 6:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[take down that cheap ass no razor having bastard]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 30th 2006 6:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, there goes my woody.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven A. Ballmer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 30th 2006 6:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[You ain't the only one, Steve.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[J (NO PERIOD!) Allard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 30th 2006 6:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[He's looking like a stereotypical individual from his ancestry: a Syrian.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 30th 2006 6:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm not sure I understand the facts correctly, but the statement from Apple seems to say that Jobs was aware of the irregularities in the options grant dates, but shouldn't be punished because he didn't benefit from them (he gave them back).<br><br>To me, that sounds very similar to a bank robber that returns the loot because the law is breathing down his neck saying "I'm not guilty because I didn't benefit from the stolen money".  The crime is stealing the money (or fudging dates on options) in the first place; how it works out in the end means nothing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stymie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 30th 2006 7:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can someone please explain what the complexities of SEC filings and corporate governance - which are going on all the time for every company on the NASDAQ - has to do with EN-lightening us about GADGETS?<br><br>The options restatement issue is not one affecting just AAPL, it is an ongoing probe affecting hundreds of companies, some of which make gadgets or parts of gadgets you might have in your pocket at this very moment.<br><br>Even if it was a significant issue worthy of gadget newsdom, I don't remember seeing much coverage of the iPAQ maker HP's pretexting scandal, which was a far more serious issue, or the more recent controversy over Microsoft's gifiting of laptops to get favorable Vista reviews.<br><br>Yet in the past week, there have been 3 sensationalized Apple options beat-ups, written with colored language intended to portray a sense of nefarious corruption.<br><br>You guys are obsessed with Apple, and it's affecting your coverage of other, more important news.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Reg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 30th 2006 7:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[With HP, the people involved were just business people who had no real influence on the past, present, or future of computers, technology, etc.<br><br>With Steve Jobs, you have one of the most influential people in the personal computing business, responsible for the birth of a billion dollar company, the resurgence of that company, some beautiful products (love em or hate em, the iPod, iMac, and OSX are wonderful products; you have to at least respect their influence). <br><br>HP with out Linda Dunn (or whomever it was) is still good ol' HP.<br><br>Apple without Steve Jobs is not Apple.  Steve is a power player.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[William]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 30th 2006 8:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[shave, its good for your soul. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 30th 2006 8:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Shaving is good for your soul?  WTF is that claptrap?<br><br>I wish *I* could go without shaving (it doesn't look very good on me).  The only thing shaving is good for is so that small-minded people don't live in fear of the scary, hairy monster mountain-man...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xVariable]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 30th 2006 9:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[steve jobs is one dodgy character; how in hell he cannot be held in some way to account, is beyond me. There are some strings being pulled to get him out of some pretty dang hot water. I fucking hate that dude; he's bent as hell... if this were Bill Gates; we'd have all the aPple ghey boys getting erections over the situation; how Billy is bent and money grabbing blah blah blah.. hah; I hope Steve gets forced to quit and then he can live out his days as the money grabbing fluzzy he is.. pleh]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[oooh-wii]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 30th 2006 9:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[oooh-wii, you amazed me how shallow people can be.<br><br>Have you met Steve Jobs? Have spoken/heard a word to/from him? Has he done any harm to your body or soul?<br><br>If not, please enlighten us how you are able to generate so much hate toward another human being. Please. I'm all ears.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Javaflash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 30th 2006 10:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Have you done the same? Where's the love coming from? I'm all ears.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Deluxe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 30th 2006 11:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thank you Deluxe; my thoughts exactly...<br><br>...point being; it's Steve Jobs, so no matter how dodgy and bent he is - applettes will find some strange odd weird crazy deluded way of sticking up for him - in all this mess.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[oooh-wii]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 30th 2006 11:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is it just me or does uncle Stevie look crazy old with that beard.  Apple is screwed when he finally retires, or dies.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Simmons]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 30th 2006 11:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[No love. No hate. Simply mutual respect.<br><br>Btw, did I state anything toward that implication?<br><br>I'm puzzled + even more amazed because instantly, your words implicated more hates toward another batch of strangers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Javaflash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2006 2:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Btw, I have a great life. I enjoy every moment of my life.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Javaflash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2006 2:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's no secret (since 1980s) that Steve Jobs is an asshole. Even Steve Jobs himself knows he is an asshole. I just don't understand why we need to hate or love him.<br><br>I do love Apple Computer, Inc.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Javaflash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2006 2:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you need a dvd to zune converter software.you may download it from here.<br><a href="http://www.dvdtozuneconverter.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dvdtozuneconverter.com</a> I used it and I feel it is fine.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nakehh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2006 4:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[It looks like there several ice-holes here. Steve is in excellent company then.<br><br>I admire Apple as a company and prefer its software and hardware.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Troy Banther]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2006 10:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Entrepreneural greatness without integrity replaces greatness with greed/sleaze and thereafter demeans the business. The bottom line, is that the customer is treated with contempt and ripped off.<br><br>A happy, prosperous and sleaze free new year to you all.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian  Davis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2007 6:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple takes $84 million charge, defends Steve Jobs in options scandal]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/30/apple-takes-84-million-charge-defends-steve-jobs-in-options-sc/</guid><description><![CDATA[If i've been reading things right the story goes something like this:<br><br>a couple years ago, apple's on the up and some internal board allots some stock options to the 'Special Kind of Asshole' When Shteve finds out about it he returns to the company that potential money. Steveo didn't become the ceo by being a well read accountant, so he didn't realise that it might have been a big problem to actually accept the dough, rather a bit of serendipity for him, but the company has to answer for cooking behind the boss's back to the gov. Remember this is the same guy who's company bought him a jet at the same time as taking a 1cent annual salary. not you're regular company for sure.<br><br>I'm sure everyone can agree that steve jobs is a special special variety of asshole; even the most diehard, uh fanboi, and the most respectful conscientious objector.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[me duh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2007 1:45AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>