http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/ Engadget Comments for DisplayPort to support HDCP, too http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/Jan 3rd 2007 9:00AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/Jan 3rd 2007 9:05AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/
Remember the good old days when you would screw the antenna connectors on to the back of your tv? those were good times.]]>Jan 3rd 2007 10:04AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/Jan 3rd 2007 10:22AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/
Um, back up a minute there, industry...]]>Jan 3rd 2007 10:24AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/
I guess a DisplayPort -> HDMI adapter will break the HDCP chain, too, huh? Because heaven help us if they let us actually USE last years HD/BD players with a new set.

Thanks alot Paranoid Industry Execs.

Why not make the damn cable standard, and have firmware upgradeable chipsets, so I dont have to replace my g*dd*amn television / dvd player everytime some Paranoid Industry Exec gets a bug up his @ss about copy protection?]]>Jan 3rd 2007 10:26AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/Jan 3rd 2007 12:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/Jan 3rd 2007 11:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/Jan 3rd 2007 3:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/Jan 3rd 2007 3:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/Jan 3rd 2007 4:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/displayport-to-support-hdcp-too/http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/ati_nvidia_hdcp_support

would it be too much to hope that what it actually means is a break in the chain? It would be hard to imagine that these cards can't decode h.264 since people have been watching h.264 on their computers for a while now. Of course if the optical drive in the pc demands authentification, then you're movies are going to suck, but everything else should be hunky dory.

fucking copy protection! drm'd shit is so inconsistent. some won't play on my ps2, and some won't play on the standalone dvd player. bloody shit industry!!! ]]>Jan 3rd 2007 9:36PM