<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[Anyone else second guessing Apple's jump to Intel now?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lou]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 3:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple's decision to switch to Intel was best because of x86. With Intel, Apple has boot camp and can bring over many more switchers than if it had stayed with IBM.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee Glantz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 3:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[No, not at all. The 6ghz power6 chips would NEVER have found their way into an Apple system, even if they had stuck with IBM. The issues with heat management would have been just as bad (if not worse) than the Power5s, which caused Apple a great deal of headaches. <br><br>Besides, IBMs update schedule is far slower than Apple's or Intel's, meaning that a (lack of) chip development would seriously slow Apple's growth in the market.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 3:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[IBM is 34-core Cell in 2010 according to a recent Powerpoint presentation<br><br>2 PPEs (2-PowerPC cores)<br>32 SPEs (32 SPE Cores)<br>45nm SOI<br>~ 1TFLOPs<br>2010<br><br><a href="http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/5576/cellroadmapxk3.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/5576/cellroadmapxk3.jpg</a><br><a href="http://www.ppcnux.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=6666" rel="nofollow">http://www.ppcnux.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=6666</a><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Castle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 3:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is cool, but considering IBM's chip yields, there will be one mega-PS3 we'll all have to time-share for six years.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 3:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, that is fast, but i don't see anything using all of that power soon, or at least nothing for home use.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cowboy Bob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 3:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[The thing is, x86 support can and could be a gateway into Apple and a good fit for the laptop performance, but they can also maintain performance of desktops by sticking with the PowerPC architecture.  There's nothing stopping them from flip-flopping at any time with OSX.  As far as I'm aware, most of the binaries will work on either platform.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andir3.0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 3:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hopefully this leads to better and cheaper blu-ray players.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 4:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[The CELL processor has nothing to do with Bluray.  The only connection between the two technology is that the PS3 uses both of them.  Hoping that better CELL processors would lead to cheaper Bluray players is like hoping a more powerful internal combustion engine would lead to cheaper satellite radio.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 4:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, I was gonna say, if the internal combustion engine was cheaper to produce, the engines in the machine that ferry the space shuttle to the pad, the trains that bring the parts and the other residual costs would be reduced.  In that sense, putting a satellite in orbit would be cheaper and the service fees could be reduced...that or the CEO of the radio companies will get bigger checks because they did so much to reduce the cost.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andir3.0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 5:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's not x86, the vast majority of people will still not be interested.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Liam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 5:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[Windows is not the only OS in the world.  OSX should be able to run on either x86 or PowerPC architecture (not sure about Cell) and Linux has kernel support for the Cell as well.  Just because x86 seems to be the only architecture that Intel and AMD use right now, the steps AMD is taking may step the industry away from x86 instructions slowly (which is a good thing.)  If you brush this off as meaningless because you can't put it in your PC tomorrow, you have a very short sighted (read Microsoft-centric) view of the industry.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andir3.0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 6:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[This will pave the way for cheaper PS3's netx year, same clock speed, 65nm process.  Same performance, less heat (not that PS3 gets very hot anyway), less noise (not that PS3 is already almost silent).  Smaller heatsinks, lighter constrution.<br><br>a 65nm based PS3 will seriously reduce the losses Sony make on the PS3, allowing a cheaper pricepoint or consumers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 6:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[>>The CELL processor has nothing to do with Bluray. The only connection between the two technology is that the PS3 uses both of them. Hoping that better CELL processors would lead to cheaper Bluray players is like hoping a more powerful internal combustion engine would lead to cheaper satellite radio.<br><br>Actually both Sony and Toshiba are planning on using the cell as a decoder for Blu-ray/HD-DVD players.  The reason is quite simple, they need cheap mass-produced processor that can decode Mpeg2/Mpeg4 H.264/VC-1 at 1920x0180 resolution in realtime.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Castle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 6:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[mmmmmm.....6ghz of goodness]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 6:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[This will pave the way for cheaper PS3's netx year, same clock speed, 65nm process.  Same performance, less heat (not that PS3 gets very hot anyway), less noise (not that PS3 is already almost silent).  Smaller heatsinks, lighter constrution.<br><br>a 65nm based PS3 will seriously reduce the losses Sony make on the PS3, allowing a cheaper pricepoint or consumers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 6:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[what is everyones guess one what this chip is used for first?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Giltronic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 6:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[No way PS3 gets a new CPU. They couldn't afford to fragment the market like that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[scott berfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 6:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[It would be the same chip, just a different process.<br><br>I wonder how the Cell Yield is doing these days.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DynamicStability]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 7:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah this is going to push the market in the right direction as far as rendering goes.  Hopefully it performs like it says.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hello]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 8:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wouldn't find it unreasonable for IBM to supply sony with a smaller die version (read: lower-power consuption) of the current spec cell processor in the PS3, somewhere down the road. Microsoft is already sourcing cheaper and lower-powered spec 65nm chips for the 360. (due mid-07) Also, it may be cheaper in that, sony automatically disables ONE processor on the chip in the current PS3, in order to increase yield. In the future, with a better process, they may be able to design this out, lowering cost.  <br><br>sources: <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/multimedia/display/20050517041438.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/multimedia/display/20050517041438.html</a><br>(PS3 & Cell)<br><a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/multimedia/display/20061226101150.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/multimedia/display/20061226101150.html</a><br>(MS & Chartered)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2007 12:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[Vocal tone doesn't travel well through the internets.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2007 2:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[Even if they did put this new chip in the ps3 I wouldn't buy the ps3 nor the xbox 360 until they add these specs.<br><br>These are the specs that will make a console last 10 years<br>              <br>PS3                               xbox 360 zephyr<br>blu-ray/ hd-dvd drive            blu-ray/ hd-dvd<br>hdmi port            ATI R600 based graphics    <br>wi-fi for all models              built in wi-fi<br>512 MiB or 1GB of Rambus XDR DRAM  120 gb hd<br>6 GHZ cell processor  65mm      65 mm tri-core 4 GHZ<br>New RSX graphics card based on                      a 8900 GTX instead of the                 hdmi      crappy 7800 GTX<br>PS3's RAM is only 256 MB. That's not a lot of RAM especially if you are going to run linix on the ps3. 512 MB minimum and 1 - 2 GB's of RAM would be appreciated. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2007 11:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[Even if they did put this new chip in the ps3 I wouldn't buy the ps3 nor the xbox 360 until they add these specs.<br><br>These are the specs that will make a console last 10 years<br>              <br>PS3 SE second edition                              <br>blu-ray/ hd-dvd drive<br>hdmi 1.3a port                          <br>wi-fi for all models            <br>512 MiB or 1GB of Rambus XDR DRAM  <br>6 GHZ cell processor  65mm      <br>New RSX graphics card based on                      a 8900 GTX instead of the                       crappy 7800 GTX<br><br>XBOX 360 codename: ZEPHYR<br>blu-ray/ hd-dvd drive<br>hdmi 1.3a port <br>built in wi-fi for all models <br>4 GHZ tri-core 65 mm processor<br>New graphics card based on the ATI R600<br>Quiet Fan<br>- These specs will make both companys microsoft and sony a lot of dough. Both companys should make the hardware for  next line of ps3's and xbox 360's upgrade compatible. Making the hardware upgrade compatible like that of a pc will allow gamers to take out there old 360 or ps3 graphics card and put in a new one when the company creates them. <br>PS3's RAM is only 256 MB. That's not a lot of RAM especially if you are going to run linix on the ps3. 512 MB minimum and 1 - 2 GB's of RAM would be appreciated. With these]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2007 11:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM and friends spice up CELL: 6GHz and 65nm right around the corner]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/ibm-and-friends-spice-up-cell-6ghz-and-65nm-right-around-the-co/</guid><description><![CDATA[Even if they did put this new chip in the ps3 I wouldn't buy the ps3 nor the xbox 360 until they add these specs.<br><br>These are the specs that will make a console last 10 years<br>              <br> PS3 SE second edition                              <br>blu-ray - hd-dvd combo drive/ hdmi 1.3a port/ wi-fi for all models/ 512 MiB or 1GB of Rambus XDR DRAM/6 GHZ cell processor  65mm/ New RSX graphics card based on nVidia's upcoming 8900 GTX instead of the  crappy 7800 GTX/ *Hardware upgrade compatibility<br>                           <br>                         <br> XBOX 360 codename: ZEPHYR<br>blu-ray - hd-dvd combo drive/ hdmi 1.3a port/     built in wi-fi for all models/ 4 GHZ tri-core 65 mm processor/ New graphics card based on the ATI R600/<br>Quiet Fan/ *Hardware upgrade compatibility<br> <br><br>- These specs will make both companys microsoft and sony a lot of dough. Both companys should make the hardware for  next line of ps3's and xbox 360's upgrade compatible. Making the hardware upgrade compatible like that of a pc will allow gamers to take out there old 360 or ps3 graphics card and put in a new one when the company creates them. <br>PS3's RAM is only 256 MB. That's not a lot of RAM especially if you are going to run linix on the ps3. 512 MB minimum and 1 - 2 GB's of RAM would be appreciated. With these]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2007 11:47PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>