http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/ Engadget Comments for Intel's Core 2 Quad launched -- right in time for Macworld http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/Jan 10th 2007 6:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/
only for the low price of $851?

what if i want to get a $350 processor? am i stuck with a E6400?]]>Jan 9th 2007 12:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/

;)]]>Jan 9th 2007 12:54AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/They mean that this now steals the spotlight from the E6700 as the top consumer level processor (excludes Exreme, Xeons)]]>Jan 9th 2007 12:48AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/Jan 9th 2007 2:19AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/Jan 9th 2007 1:28AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/Jan 9th 2007 1:55AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/Jan 9th 2007 2:02AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/Jan 9th 2007 2:41AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/Jan 9th 2007 4:53AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/
I've got a 32 core Opteron at work that will destroy any intel system (I think intel stops at 8 or 16 cores now and the performance increase really drops off after 8 cores...)]]>Jan 9th 2007 3:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/Jan 9th 2007 3:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/Jan 10th 2007 3:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/Jan 9th 2007 8:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/
I'm gonna wait till the quads get in the $300 to $400 range.]]>Jan 9th 2007 9:01AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/intels-core-2-quad-launched-right-in-time-for-macworld/to make their high performance processors unaffordable their's really no point in getting a new low end pc or gpu when u already have one. the new quad core should be no more than 350$ tops tax included. no pc clock chip is physicaly worth more than that regardless of its speed boost. Z.]]>Apr 4th 2007 9:59PM