http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/ Engadget Comments for Westinghouse Quad HD on display http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/
As for 1080p, do you think we could be seeing it more commonly in smaller displays in the coming years? Do you think there could be a time when virtually ALL TVs are 1080p?

It seems to make sense to me. Relatively small monitors have resolutions higher than 1080p, so why not TVs? Sure, maybe you can't see the difference, but why not just have the resolution? Maybe I'm just dreaming...]]>Jan 10th 2007 9:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/Jan 10th 2007 9:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/
Coming to a desktop near you in a few years? ;) ]]>Jan 10th 2007 10:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/Jan 10th 2007 11:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/Jan 10th 2007 11:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/Jan 10th 2007 10:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/Jan 11th 2007 7:47AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/Jan 10th 2007 10:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/
Still buggy as hell... ]]>Jan 10th 2007 10:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2006/february1/med-simulate-020106.html or http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/1723427.stm
]]>Jan 11th 2007 12:07AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/
720 x 3 = 1080 x 2 = 2160]]>Jan 10th 2007 11:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/
The higher resolutions will show even the smallest subsurface anomalies indicating the possibility of petroleum being found, or better, show whether the particular anomaly is natural gas, petroleum, or some mixture and whether it's worth going after.

I think the medical industry could use these, too, like in that episode of House where he couldn't find the problem on a small screen, and had to go to a larger screen to detect some medical problem in a body scan (if i recall correctly).]]>Jan 24th 2007 10:57PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/Jan 11th 2007 6:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/
You are forgetting the apple 30" display already does 2560 x 1600, so based on that the resolution for a 52" being 3840 x 2160 seems quite fair & would make it a fantastic large monitor.

There will be a day when even 30" won't be considered a large monitor and the cheaper LCD's etc are getting these days it doesn't seem so far away.]]>Jan 11th 2007 9:20AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/Jan 11th 2007 9:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/10/westinghouse-quad-hd-on-display/http://www.nvidia.com/page/quadroplex.html

Prices range from about $18000 to $25000 depending on which graphics cards you select.
]]>Jan 11th 2007 12:14PM