http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/ Engadget Comments for iPhone powered by Samsung, not Intel? http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/Jan 11th 2007 5:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/Jan 11th 2007 7:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/Jan 11th 2007 5:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/Jan 11th 2007 5:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/Jan 11th 2007 5:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/Jan 11th 2007 5:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/Jan 11th 2007 6:06PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/
I mean what, did you think they loaded up 2GB of OSX on a core solo or something???

There is some genuine critiques to be made but some you guys are really reaching.]]>Jan 11th 2007 6:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/Jan 11th 2007 6:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/Jan 11th 2007 5:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/
]]>Jan 11th 2007 9:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/The answer to that would be No.]]>Jan 11th 2007 8:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/Jan 13th 2007 9:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/Jan 11th 2007 8:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/Jan 13th 2007 9:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/Jan 11th 2007 6:32PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/Jan 11th 2007 6:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/
http://tinyurl.com/yb6bbc]]>Jan 11th 2007 7:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/Jan 11th 2007 8:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/
Not really. I was under the impression that you can run third party applications on other smartphones (running Windows Mobile, Symbian, and such).]]>Jan 11th 2007 9:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/Jan 11th 2007 8:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/Does it really matter..? Unless the next version has an open system that apps can be added to, who really cares?
Who really thought it had an Intel Core Duo in there anyway..? Seriously, just because Jobs says it runs OS X and the new desktops run OS X? That's quite a leap. Have we all forgotten that OS X ran on IBM chips last year..? Even supposing that at some point in the future other apps can be installed, I would think as long as they meet the API rules for OS X, like a widget for instance, they'll run on the phone - *THAT'S* the reason Jobs is touting that it runs OS X - one development environment.]]>Jan 11th 2007 11:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/Jan 12th 2007 2:01AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/
"Are you nuts? Because it looks like it and Steve Jobs says so, doesn't mean it's running full OS X."

LIsten to Kev everyone. Despite Job's announcement, the iPhone is actually running in Vista. How cool is that. Perhaps Job's also not telling us that he works for Cisco part time Mondays and Fridays.]]>Jan 12th 2007 5:27AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-powered-by-samsung-not-intel/
A little web searching produces: http://www.theregister.com/2004/03/05/samsung_joins_ibm_65nm_r/

I could be wrong to assume of course.
]]>Jan 12th 2007 4:36PM