<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Patent troll strikes again: OPTi heads after Apple this time</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Patent troll strikes again: OPTi heads after Apple this time</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Patent troll strikes again: OPTi heads after Apple this time]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think the iPhone is selling for so much to keep Apple in the black after all these lawsuits.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[disciple83]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 18th 2007 5:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Patent troll strikes again: OPTi heads after Apple this time]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</guid><description><![CDATA[Take that apple fanboys!<br>(Posted from a Dual 1.8ghz G5)<br><br><a href="http://www.thesimexchange.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thesimexchange.com/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 18th 2007 5:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Patent troll strikes again: OPTi heads after Apple this time]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</guid><description><![CDATA[i believe the lawsuit was filed on the 16th NOT the patent...again great proofing of the article before posting]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 18th 2007 5:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Patent troll strikes again: OPTi heads after Apple this time]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</guid><description><![CDATA[I also believe that it is EasterN District, not Easter District.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KevinC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 4:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Patent troll strikes again: OPTi heads after Apple this time]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</guid><description><![CDATA[I kinda understand them :  if you dont have enough money to get a decent logo, go look for some by everymean necessary......]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ayle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 18th 2007 5:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Patent troll strikes again: OPTi heads after Apple this time]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple thought they were the only one with patents huh?....a taste of their own medicine]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[blaQ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2007 10:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Patent troll strikes again: OPTi heads after Apple this time]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</guid><description><![CDATA[What the heck is predictive snooping and how does it apply to anything Intel, AMD, and especially Apple sell?  Apple makes very little of the underlying computer hardware, and I'd guess that's what it's about seeing as AMD nor Intel specialize in software.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim O.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 18th 2007 6:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Patent troll strikes again: OPTi heads after Apple this time]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey thanks for fucking the whole technical advancement OPTi. Hope that money earns all of you a special place in hell!<br><br>Your name should be OP=Ti<br>Old Patents = Tangible income. <br><br>Who needs to work when you can make patents? I am in the wrong business. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KevMa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 18th 2007 6:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Patent troll strikes again: OPTi heads after Apple this time]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</guid><description><![CDATA[Too bad I didn't come up with a way to frivolously sue companies for ideas I came up with but never used.  I'd be rich by now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 18th 2007 10:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Patent troll strikes again: OPTi heads after Apple this time]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</guid><description><![CDATA[Patents should be like trademarks. Once registered they must be put into use within a certain time period or they are forfeited. Kinda like the whole iPhone naming debacle. Also, +1 to Tim O. Apple doesn't make the hardware (components w/in the case). They just design it. And I'm pretty sure that if an Apple computer has this "patented tech" then there are others out there that are in trouble]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 19th 2007 12:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Patent troll strikes again: OPTi heads after Apple this time]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</guid><description><![CDATA[If I invent something I should have the right to make money off the invention exclusively, not the patent itself.  I can come up with a dozen ways to make this work.  Why is it so hard for people to make patent laws fair!?!  What a $hitty world!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 19th 2007 1:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Patent troll strikes again: OPTi heads after Apple this time]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/patent-troll-strikes-again-opti-heads-after-apple-this-time/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think that makes terribly much sense, really...<br><br>Not everyone has either the means or capability to manufacture products, so the ability to sell their idea (and the rights thereto) is one I'm happy to protect.<br><br>Likewise, a simplistic implementation of "use-it-or-lose-it" style time limits would be harmful to smaller, independent inventors.<br><br>I think it's obvious that some changes are needed, but I definitely don't think it's a simple matter.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KerryB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 19th 2007 1:47PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
