<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow you people will never be happy. One moment it's the Microsoft lovers complaining that engadget is too anti-Zune, now it's the Apple lovers complaining about a harmlesss joke which isn't particularly offensive to Apple. They don't even try and say the idea was stolen, merely aquired, which is what i assume is aggravating you. On the most part the editors are very neutral, so either be happy and don't whine, or go read TUAW instead.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex C]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 22nd 2007 1:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple bashing? Have you lost your mind? It's an article about technology particularly how multitouch was developed.<br><br>Besides Engadget is one of the most pro-Apple blogs on the net that is not dedicated to apple.<br><br>Al: That's not really multi touch. What the touchpad read was the larger area being stimulated on the pad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 22nd 2007 12:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple trackpads have been using a form of multi touch for a while now anyway. Dragging two fingers across it and it scrolls the window and of course holding with two fingers and clicking does the magic right click. After a little practise this is much better than having two buttons on the trackpad, still prefer a two button mouse though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Al]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 22nd 2007 12:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA["Al: That's not really multi touch. What the touchpad read was the larger area being stimulated on the pad."<br><br>No, MacBook's trackpads actually detect both fingers. I tried putting several fingers together or even my palm and it wouldn't right click/scroll. It's only when it detects two different contact points that it switches to scroll mode or right click.<br><br>Also, something not many people know, you don't have to click while holding two fingers to get the right button behavior: just standard tapping -but with two fingers- works too (assuming of course that you have tapping = click enabled in System Preferences)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ignacio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 22nd 2007 1:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA[Also in the world of the future we will all look like Bill Gates.<br><br>Ironic.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[strider_mt2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 22nd 2007 12:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA[You might want to check sensitive object technology, kinda cool.<br>They can turn ANY SURFACE into a sensitive one using time reversal of lamb waves.<br><a href="http://www.sensitive-object.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sensitive-object.com/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 22nd 2007 12:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA[MMMMM lamb...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[strider_mt2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 22nd 2007 1:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA[I admit, I am a TouchStream (FingerWorks) keyboard freak.  I love it.  Too bad it has some technical glitches and the support software sucks .. oh and it is no longer supported due to the buyout.<br><br>But if the iPhone is based on this (which I assumed it is), then the iPhone's touch interface will be the best ever encountered on a cell phone.  Very response, very awesome.  Only one problem - do not try using it when your fingers or damp!  At least, if the iPhone uses the same electroconductive technology of the TouchStream keyboard, you will see some weeeirrd behaviors..<br><br>Now, last problem, I wonder..  My TouchStream keyboard wigs out when my cellphone rings and is near it..  Hope that does not happen with the iPhone..  That would be weird.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Maztec]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 22nd 2007 1:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA[$1.500? Who, why, where? I have one of those collecting dust in my almost-forgotten-gadget-vaults...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Buis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 22nd 2007 1:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ok, these two nerdy looking guys are using a Sun computer, running Windows, to develop an interface for an Apple only system for stylish people.<br><br>Now if only Jobs could think in such an open way (viz his comments about running the open, cross platform java me on the iphone).<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kOa7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 22nd 2007 1:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA[will we see anymore multi touch products? e.g. a line of apple multi touch controllers for use by arty farty types? it seems a bit counter-productive for apple to sit on innovations like this and only introduce them in the iPhone (which although mighty fancy, doesn't really offer much for people who want to be productive with their technology)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ibrahim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 22nd 2007 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA[Unless I'm mistaken, my best guess is that this is the technology they're using, only smaller:<br><br><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/09/nyus-multi-touch-sensing-through-frustrated-total-internal-refl/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/09/nyus-multi-touch-sensing-through-frustrated-total-internal-refl/</a><br><br>In other words, the surfaces for "arty farty" types are already being built.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Manos De Plata]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 22nd 2007 3:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm sure we will see an Apple eBook reader with a high res screens and multiTouch technology within a year.<br>Apple iPod is to MP3 as Apple eBook is to PDF.<br>You will be able to purchase books and magazines through the iTunes store.<br>You will also be able to subscribe to PDFcasts through iTunes.<br>iTunes will sync your PDFs to the eBook for reading.<br>You will be able to turn pages with a simple gesture and it will look beautiful with the CoreAnimation page flips.<br>You will also be able to use the pinch gestures to zoom in and out.<br>The text will look amazing because of the high res screen and Leopards res-independent GUI.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SubGenius]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 22nd 2007 4:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA[There are a bunch of igestures and keyboards on Froogle. I wonder if they are legit...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[leob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 22nd 2007 9:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA[Buis: I was just thinking the same thing - I have one that I gave up on because I just couldn't use it fulltime and it has been in my desk for 3yrs. I would welcome a 1500 bid for it :). I found a $500 bid on it on ebay.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gburch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2007 3:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm going to wait to see how well this stuff actually works with a device that will be in your pocket all day and subject to all kinds of environments.  I mean, it's pretty easy to know the scenarios that a keyboard will face but a mobile phone has to have issues.<br><br><br>John<br><a href="http://www.monomachines.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.monomachines.com</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[isaac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2007 9:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA[The fingerworks keyboards simply wasn't that good. yeah it was novel and having a huge mousing surface without removing your hands from the keyboard was prety cool. but lack of tactile feedback and the fack that you're typing on a hard surface lead to new and interesting kinds of wrist/finger strain. The thing shuffled around our office until I could longer get rid of it... it had some utility, but the perfoamnce was never there.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joelja]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2007 1:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA[I still think Apple will come out with some amazing products based on this kind of technology. Read: Big displays with multitouch...<br><br><a href="http://brilliantdays.com/multi-touch/" rel="nofollow">http://brilliantdays.com/multi-touch/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Oyvind]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2007 2:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA[It appears that Apple utilized good technology and made it work.  To my mind, Microsoft takes good technology and absolutely screws it up.  Let's face it, makeing things work properly is NOT Microsoft's strong suit.  It is Apple's strong suit.  So, please have the author go back to Vista (the new Yugo of OS), and have fun waiting for his machine to boot up (if it ever does).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EEDesigner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 30th 2007 3:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have been using the iGesture pad for as a few years. It's the only thing I can use as my wrist has gone south on me. An ordinary mouse drives me up a wall. Plus I really can't do my job anymore. I'm in graphics and use precise motions that I can't do anymore with the mouse. So NOW, my iGesture pad went Kapoot! I just realized that I can't get it fixed nor buy a new one. Looked for a couple days. Until I found this article, my hope was dashed. Well it's still dashed, but maybe... Anyway has anyone found another touchpad mouse? Of Fingerworks abilities? Not.<br>mike]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mikegmn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2007 4:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/22/some-iphone-touchscreen-roots-splained-by-fingerworks-inventors/</guid><description><![CDATA[See.... THAT'S windows on that computer there... F U apple :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[samov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 7th 2008 12:23PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>