http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/24/the-iphone-reviewed-no-the-other-iphone/ Engadget Comments for The iPhone reviewed. No, the other iPhone. http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/24/the-iphone-reviewed-no-the-other-iphone/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/24/the-iphone-reviewed-no-the-other-iphone/
Same goes for screen sharing, eg Macromedia Breeze kaking out mid presentation.

I'd like to see a site that did nothing but measure and display the point to point reliability of media across networks, in a neutral way.
]]>Jan 24th 2007 1:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/24/the-iphone-reviewed-no-the-other-iphone/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/24/the-iphone-reviewed-no-the-other-iphone/Jan 24th 2007 1:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/24/the-iphone-reviewed-no-the-other-iphone/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/24/the-iphone-reviewed-no-the-other-iphone/Jan 24th 2007 3:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/24/the-iphone-reviewed-no-the-other-iphone/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/24/the-iphone-reviewed-no-the-other-iphone/
It will sell well for a short time...then fall off a cliff as people realize they have been had my Steve(Ron Popeil)Jobs. Just like all the hype about the AppleTV only to find out it is a watered-down overpriced atempt to copy the Slingcatcher.Listen to this TWITcast and you will see what I mean ;)
http://www.twit.tv/dgw]]>Jan 24th 2007 3:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/24/the-iphone-reviewed-no-the-other-iphone/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/24/the-iphone-reviewed-no-the-other-iphone/
Basically, I don't care.

Why is it EVERY SINGLE article has to come down to this "I hate X" rant. Go yell it from the mountain.]]>Jan 24th 2007 5:06PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/24/the-iphone-reviewed-no-the-other-iphone/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/24/the-iphone-reviewed-no-the-other-iphone/
I thought for a minute that it was released to put pressure on Apple, but it's a really nice VOIP phone.

After reading this review, I think Apple is going to have a hard time in court. ]]>Jan 25th 2007 11:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/24/the-iphone-reviewed-no-the-other-iphone/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/24/the-iphone-reviewed-no-the-other-iphone/
Anyway, the way Apple went about using the trademark ANYWAY was wrong. Bottom line, they wanted something and they tried to be nasty and just take it... that's wrong.

But the phone... it's nice. So nice it's makes me think, 'Quit crying Cisco because this phone makes your phone look like a "prepaid".

Apple could try iFone, iCell, iTalk, iAM (since people take apple products so personally that speaking against them is like blasphemy), or whatever. iMean iAM iTired iOf iHearing iN.E.more iStuff iBout iTAll.]]>Jan 26th 2007 5:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/01/24/the-iphone-reviewed-no-the-other-iphone/http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/24/the-iphone-reviewed-no-the-other-iphone/For More Informations Please Contact The Following Blow:
Email: mobilehouseltd@eyou.com
Email: mobilehouseltd@eyou.com
Thanks And God Bless
Company Sales Manager
Mrs.Lisa:]]>Feb 17th 2007 5:08AM