<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Intel fleshes out a few more Penryn deets</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Intel fleshes out a few more Penryn deets</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel fleshes out a few more Penryn deets]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</guid><description><![CDATA[that picture isnt really showing how small 45nm is...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cowboy Bob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2007 5:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel fleshes out a few more Penryn deets]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</guid><description><![CDATA[i want PENRYN wow, the least they could do is commit to 775, then id be happy :) ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2007 7:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel fleshes out a few more Penryn deets]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Hyper-Threading portion has been retracted.  See Daily Tech link (Read link) for more details.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sdsdv10]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2007 6:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel fleshes out a few more Penryn deets]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</guid><description><![CDATA[Are the sockets for the core, core 2, and xeon processors going to remain the same as they are now in LGA771 for xeons and 775 for all else?<br><br>I want to buy a mac pro, but im also watching out for future upgrades on the Intel 5000V motherboard.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[helloUser]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2007 4:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel fleshes out a few more Penryn deets]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow, just wow, with Wolfdale's front-side bus being 1333MHz, it's going to kill all AMD processors.<br><br>i sure hope AMD increases their future quad-cores front-side bus speeds to 4000MHz or something to beat Intel.<br><br>can anyone tell me what that is a picture of? The only thing i can think of is a giant silicon.....thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brennan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2007 7:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel fleshes out a few more Penryn deets]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</guid><description><![CDATA[that wafer holds prob. about 100 cores of a processor, or dies. a machine removes them from that then places it on a circuit board, and u have a processor<br><br>yeah s/he's probably holding about half a mil. $ right there]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[skmetal7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2007 8:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel fleshes out a few more Penryn deets]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</guid><description><![CDATA[i never understood why they put SQUARE processor dies on a ROUND wafer though, the ones on the edge look like they are cut off]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[skmetal7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2007 8:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel fleshes out a few more Penryn deets]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeah that really only shows a silicon (?) wafer and you really can't see what's on the die. the wafers are round because of how they're grown. a chunk of seed silicon is spun up in a vat of molten silicon until it reaches the diameter they want and is then lifted out to grow it length wise. you could grow an almost pure silicon crystal the size of a person  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rspiegel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2007 9:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel fleshes out a few more Penryn deets]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/intel-fleshes-out-a-few-more-penryn-deets/</guid><description><![CDATA[skmetal7, it is, amongst other things, because the wafer needs to be evenly heated during manufacturing, and being circular aides that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Boswell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2007 10:29PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
