<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</guid><description><![CDATA[How many of these things do we have to see before one even becomes available to purchase?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aural]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2007 10:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, especially for the external HDD market. For the space that these take up, 1 TB of solid state goodness would be awesome.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shirizaki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2007 11:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm more interested in seeing these things get thinner and thinner so someone can put a more traditional drive in there for mass storage and one of these drives for OS\App storage.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2007 10:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would like to see them put two of these in a case so its the same size as the others available.  They could market it as a 128 GB SSD.  Really expensive, but a lot more useful.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2007 10:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</guid><description><![CDATA[All these advancements are irrelevant until SSD become affordable. I'm holding out for 2.5-inch 120GB SSD that costs less than a car.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brendan Sheehan jnr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2007 10:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</guid><description><![CDATA[All standard 2.5-inch laptop drives are 9.5mm thick.<br><br>12.5mm thick used to be the standard for all but thin/light laptops (and 15mm and maybe even thicker way back when) but I haven't seen one for at least 5 years.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fred]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2007 10:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</guid><description><![CDATA[What about the 1.8 inch (iPod) love?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lov0w93]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2007 12:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sweet. I can't wait for hard drive technology die. Such old technology.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric M]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2007 12:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</guid><description><![CDATA[You'll be waiting quite a while. For SSD's to completely eliminate hard drives from the market, SSD's would have to make a leap forward of several magnitudes, or hard drives would have to hit a brick wall with increasing areal density.<br><br>By the time a 120GB SSD is available for the current price of a 120GB hard drive, you'll likely be able to buy a 1-2 TB hard drive for the same price.<br> <br>The costs of the basic hard drive components (i.e., case, metal shell, motor, etc.) that are the same for any capacity hard drive limit its minimum cost, however. For this reason, SSD's will eventually displace lower capacity hard drives. Expect 20-40GB notebook hard drives to be the first to disappear.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lonnie McClure]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2007 4:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</guid><description><![CDATA[You should see 32Gb versions for $300 by the end of the year.<br><br>Flash prices/mb were down 30% last quarter, and an additional 30%+ drop is expected this quarter.  Sandisk is saying OEMs are looking to introduce the drives in performance laptops once the price hits $300 (which we should get to by the 3Q +/- a quarter depending on how fast the bottom falls out on flash.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan B]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2007 9:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Somewhere recently some company announced a breakthrough 2GB flash chip that was said to source for $31 a chip.<br><br>So that means that a 64GB drive based on them would cost over $992 and a 128GB drive would cost over $1984.<br><br>So using these chips you are paying $15.50 per GB.  In the most expensive 2.5" laptop hd I could find on newegg (Toshiba 200GB, $223.99) you are paying $1.12 per GB and on an on a randomly chosen 100gb drive (Hitachi, $90) you are paying $0.90 per GB.<br><br>The point is, as much as I want it, flash has a LONG way to go.<br><br>And on another note, 20GB drives will completely vanish rather quickly since Vista Home Premium requires 40GB min.<br><br>Just my 2c.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Sundy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2007 11:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</guid><description><![CDATA[What I would like to see is a few of these drives in a stripped RAID - I would imagine it would be pretty damn fast :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael La Framboise]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2007 11:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</guid><description><![CDATA[64GB meh.. I will wait for Bose-Einstein (or was it Ford-Firestone?) atomic chamber swapping model that will have 128YB in 0.25 inches.<br><br>1YB = 10^15 GB]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[blore40]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 3rd 2007 12:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/31/simpletech-announces-worlds-thinnest-2-5-inch-64gb-ssd/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is a marketing LIE.  The PQI 64GB SSD is actually the "world's thinnest" 64GB SSD.  It is 8.45mm.  More than a full 1mm thinner, or 11% thinner than the SimpleTech.  I really wish parrots would do a little research before just spouting out what they are told.  Here is the PDF on the manufacturer's website - <a href="http://www.pqi.com.tw/product2.asp?oid=142&cate1=151&PROID=280" rel="nofollow">http://www.pqi.com.tw/product2.asp?oid=142&cate1=151&PROID=280</a> .  The SATA model of the 64GB is out now, with the IDE to follow early March '07.<br><br>And here is where I have found that entire line of SSDs (and much cheaper than SimpleTech, try finding a price on the SimpleTech. I'm curious, but I bit its WAY over $10,000) - <a href="http://www.dvnation.com/nand-flash-ssd.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dvnation.com/nand-flash-ssd.html</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ssd1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 6th 2007 1:59AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
