<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice 5600 Series phone they used there.  lol  Wonder who in R&D at Apple has one of those bad boys strapped to their hips?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Xtopher Robin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 2nd 2007 8:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope they add wireless streaming of your downloaded content from your home computer at some point, too... It would sorta be like a portable AppleTV.  Then they'd really have something, and the 8 gigs wouldn't seem so small.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2007 8:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's cool.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 2nd 2007 9:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Please tell me they haven't actually been granted this patent.  Can we stop patenting every little thing?  I'd like to see patent reform along with copyright reform.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2007 5:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</guid><description><![CDATA["And BOY have we patented it!"<br>(Jobs loves his patents).<br><br>Someone should patent the process of looking both ways when you cross the road :P<br><br>Actually, it's pretty common practice to patent this kind of thing and as I recall there is a reason for it...<br>It's certainly stupid, though, especially when you consider that the only people who have the time / energy to do it are ginormous corporations like Apple.<br><br>Anyhow, looks retarded to me. Why can't the iPhone just do this directly?<br>Heck, I can directly download / listen to music on a Nintendo DS in the middle of nowhere, and that thing is a lot less powerful than an iPhone!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Picklesworth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2007 6:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[they patent everything because if they didn't microsoft would come out with a ZunePhone with all the same features<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Phatmancam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 3rd 2007 3:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Would it be possible to stop saying something is patented when the application is just published and a patent has yet to be granted?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2007 6:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple wouldn't have to patent every little thing if every little company (and big company) in the world didn't try to copy and steal their ideas every time they come out with a new product.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fluke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2007 9:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, jeez, can you blame them.  Everybody copies their every move.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rong]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2007 8:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</guid><description><![CDATA["Can we stop patenting every little thing? I'd like to see patent reform along with copyright reform."<br><br>I think we all agree but as long as patent laws stay as they are, smart companies are going to have to continue patenting everything they can think of in order to protect themselves from expensive lawsuits.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 2nd 2007 6:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[So... the internet is a series of tubes... and 2G cellular networks are made of clouds?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Just.Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2007 10:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just.Rob: Everyone knows that the network is represented by a cloud. Industry standard practise! And the groovy old Nokia is a standard MS Visio template item. Can you get Visio for a Mac?<br><br>I must say though, there doesn't appear to be anything new or revolutionary about this patent application. This (at a really high level) is exactly how any content is downloaded to a mobile device -- from ringtones upwards.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 2nd 2007 7:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why should it have to communicate with an actual PC first? What's really the point then? DRM is once again all over this, but hey at least it's better than two Zunes squirting on each other. Sorry.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave95]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2007 11:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Err, the PC represents the application running on the local device (all part of the 'service'). This could, for example, be a Java mobile jukebox application running on pretty much any handset.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 2nd 2007 6:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is hilarious, on the old side of the pond have we had direct download of music to our phones for the last 3-4 years. Maybe Jobs should have said in his keynote "it's five years ahead of other mobile phones in America and only five years behind the mobile phones and services in Europe and Asia".. :-p]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stranger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 2nd 2007 1:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/01/apple-patents-itms-transaction-service-for-iphone/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is absolutely ridiculous.  I've been doing such transactions on my Treo for years.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 2nd 2007 9:52AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
