<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Peapod DAP can handle vicious babies, but Apple legal?</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/12/peapod-dap-can-handle-vicious-babies-but-maybe-not-apple-legal/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Peapod DAP can handle vicious babies, but Apple legal?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Peapod DAP can handle vicious babies, but Apple legal?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/12/peapod-dap-can-handle-vicious-babies-but-maybe-not-apple-legal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/12/peapod-dap-can-handle-vicious-babies-but-maybe-not-apple-legal/</guid><description><![CDATA[if apple sues, it wont work, as the judge would say that the word Peapod is actually one word, as opposed to apples iPod compound word]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cowboy Bob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 12th 2007 7:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Peapod DAP can handle vicious babies, but Apple legal?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/12/peapod-dap-can-handle-vicious-babies-but-maybe-not-apple-legal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/12/peapod-dap-can-handle-vicious-babies-but-maybe-not-apple-legal/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't know. Thats kind of ballsy calling an MP3 player anything-pod.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaypoc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 13th 2007 1:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Peapod DAP can handle vicious babies, but Apple legal?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/12/peapod-dap-can-handle-vicious-babies-but-maybe-not-apple-legal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/12/peapod-dap-can-handle-vicious-babies-but-maybe-not-apple-legal/</guid><description><![CDATA[ "vicious babies" seems to be a good description of apple at the moment.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[deridder149]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 12th 2007 8:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Peapod DAP can handle vicious babies, but Apple legal?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/12/peapod-dap-can-handle-vicious-babies-but-maybe-not-apple-legal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/12/peapod-dap-can-handle-vicious-babies-but-maybe-not-apple-legal/</guid><description><![CDATA[MP3 players for babies?!?!<br>Wow. But I guess when you think about it, you gotta reach all audiences possible. So I suppose the MP3 player market for infants is wide open...<br>They aren't expecting babies to operate this - are they?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Spirit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 12th 2007 8:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Peapod DAP can handle vicious babies, but Apple legal?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/12/peapod-dap-can-handle-vicious-babies-but-maybe-not-apple-legal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/12/peapod-dap-can-handle-vicious-babies-but-maybe-not-apple-legal/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am pretty sure that the word peapod has been around a little longer than Apple's iPod.<br><br>Yeah...just a little eh.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Myles]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 12th 2007 9:39PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
