<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Details emerge on Sony's DSC-W90, W200 digital cameras</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/details-emerge-on-sonys-dsc-w90-w200-digital-cameras/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Details emerge on Sony's DSC-W90, W200 digital cameras</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Details emerge on Sony's DSC-W90, W200 digital cameras]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/details-emerge-on-sonys-dsc-w90-w200-digital-cameras/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/details-emerge-on-sonys-dsc-w90-w200-digital-cameras/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice...<br><br>I feel bad, because I just picked up a DSC W70 during Boxing Week, which was heavily discounted....<br><br>What are the differences between these and the DSC W70, besides more pixelage, better ISO, and HDMI?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mbslrm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2007 3:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Details emerge on Sony's DSC-W90, W200 digital cameras]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/details-emerge-on-sonys-dsc-w90-w200-digital-cameras/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/details-emerge-on-sonys-dsc-w90-w200-digital-cameras/</guid><description><![CDATA[3x optical zoom is really ridiculous, at least 4x in the w200 would be nice.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zzzzzzzzzz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2007 5:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Details emerge on Sony's DSC-W90, W200 digital cameras]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/details-emerge-on-sonys-dsc-w90-w200-digital-cameras/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/details-emerge-on-sonys-dsc-w90-w200-digital-cameras/</guid><description><![CDATA[HDMI!? srsly though...that's pretty farfetched]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[waffles]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2007 6:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Details emerge on Sony's DSC-W90, W200 digital cameras]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/details-emerge-on-sonys-dsc-w90-w200-digital-cameras/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/details-emerge-on-sonys-dsc-w90-w200-digital-cameras/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just an evolution of the previous W100/W70/W50 (the list goes on). I'm sure the ISO3200 option will be mostly useless. I'm also assuming the "Steadyshot" thing they have going is just the high-ISO mode.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KorruptioN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2007 8:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Details emerge on Sony's DSC-W90, W200 digital cameras]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/details-emerge-on-sonys-dsc-w90-w200-digital-cameras/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/details-emerge-on-sonys-dsc-w90-w200-digital-cameras/</guid><description><![CDATA[It would be nice to see a real Steadyshot, not the digital version, but we shall see soon enough.  HDMI is pointless, but I suppose it is a good selling point to stupid people.<br><br>Now give us some Alpha info!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2007 11:13PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
