<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Judge limits New York police surveillance practices</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/judge-limits-new-york-police-surveillance-practices/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Judge limits New York police surveillance practices</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Judge limits New York police surveillance practices]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/judge-limits-new-york-police-surveillance-practices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/judge-limits-new-york-police-surveillance-practices/</guid><description><![CDATA[freedom has to have limits its getting too technical]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2007 2:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Judge limits New York police surveillance practices]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/judge-limits-new-york-police-surveillance-practices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/judge-limits-new-york-police-surveillance-practices/</guid><description><![CDATA[if your not doing anything wrong who cares if your being videotaped... and if you are doing something wrong and your dumb enough to do it where you are being videotaped then you deserve to get caught..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2007 3:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Judge limits New York police surveillance practices]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/judge-limits-new-york-police-surveillance-practices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/judge-limits-new-york-police-surveillance-practices/</guid><description><![CDATA[Er Matt that's not the point. Yes you are right, but it's the concern due to the commonality that although you're not doing anything wrong, you're assumed to be doing something wrong by being watched, then due to bad planning and ignorance you're accused of something you have no relation to. Happens all the time, wrongful arrests due to seeing someone carrying a book someone takes a dislike to etc, just pushes it one step further. Have data will use it.<br><br>On the plus side if you're standing up for parking rights, they could add you to a mailing list for parking updates - freedom of speech marketing (hmm.. I should patent that one)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Raz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2007 6:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Judge limits New York police surveillance practices]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/judge-limits-new-york-police-surveillance-practices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/judge-limits-new-york-police-surveillance-practices/</guid><description><![CDATA[There is a new documentary about video surveillance (CCTV) in Britain coming out, and this time, the topic seems to be covered in a more critical way. There's a trailer online:<br><br><a href="http://www.EveryStepYouTake.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.EveryStepYouTake.org</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[El N]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2007 9:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Judge limits New York police surveillance practices]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/judge-limits-new-york-police-surveillance-practices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/judge-limits-new-york-police-surveillance-practices/</guid><description><![CDATA[I find it curious at home paranoid some people must be.  <br>A private citizen can videotape anyone, anywhere, yet the police cant?<br>Do you really think that law enforcement cares what the normal citizen is doing?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2007 1:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Judge limits New York police surveillance practices]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/judge-limits-new-york-police-surveillance-practices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/judge-limits-new-york-police-surveillance-practices/</guid><description><![CDATA[The point is, if camera's end up being everywhere, then you feel forced look and act like a 'normal citizen', or you'll be considered 'suspicious'.  Do you really want video's of you being reviewed by some dudes in a room miles away, with you completely unaware?  Does anyone want that?  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Je2037]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2007 11:08AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
