http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/ Engadget Comments for Microsoft, Google, and others pushing for Internet over TV airwaves http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/Mar 13th 2007 3:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/Mar 13th 2007 7:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/Mar 13th 2007 4:06PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/The UHF TV bands aren't exactly the best for the type of high-bandwidth signal required for any sort of substantial data transfer rate...

And why a discone? I would think a directional Yagi would be a better choice of an antenna.]]>Mar 13th 2007 4:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/Mar 13th 2007 4:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/Mar 13th 2007 4:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/12/AR2007031201395_pf.html]]>Mar 13th 2007 4:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/Mar 13th 2007 4:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/Mar 13th 2007 4:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/
WHAT THE HELL!]]>Mar 14th 2007 1:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/
neways, when the date when all TVs are supposed to go all-digital, wouldn't that mean that more channels would be freed up for this? ]]>Mar 13th 2007 4:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/Mar 13th 2007 4:56PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/Mar 13th 2007 5:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/13/microsoft-google-and-others-pushing-for-internet-over-tv-airwav/Mar 13th 2007 5:53PM