<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for 802.11n creeps closer to finality as Draft 2.0 reaches milestone</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/802-11n-creeps-closer-to-finality-as-draft-2-0-reaches-milestone/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for 802.11n creeps closer to finality as Draft 2.0 reaches milestone</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 802.11n creeps closer to finality as Draft 2.0 reaches milestone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/802-11n-creeps-closer-to-finality-as-draft-2-0-reaches-milestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/802-11n-creeps-closer-to-finality-as-draft-2-0-reaches-milestone/</guid><description><![CDATA["although when WiMax comes to town and makes WLANs irrelevant"<br>HAH! I can't even express how insanely shortsighted that statement is. Meh, private WLANs, who needs 'em? LOL]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NarfPointZort]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 14th 2007 9:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 802.11n creeps closer to finality as Draft 2.0 reaches milestone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/802-11n-creeps-closer-to-finality-as-draft-2-0-reaches-milestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/802-11n-creeps-closer-to-finality-as-draft-2-0-reaches-milestone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Someone could probably make a lot of money be going back and writing firmware updates for older routers that could potentially work with the new standard.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 14th 2007 9:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 802.11n creeps closer to finality as Draft 2.0 reaches milestone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/802-11n-creeps-closer-to-finality-as-draft-2-0-reaches-milestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/802-11n-creeps-closer-to-finality-as-draft-2-0-reaches-milestone/</guid><description><![CDATA[can anyone tell me of any routers using the 2.0 spec right now? ive been looking but i only seem to find 1.0]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 14th 2007 9:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 802.11n creeps closer to finality as Draft 2.0 reaches milestone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/802-11n-creeps-closer-to-finality-as-draft-2-0-reaches-milestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/802-11n-creeps-closer-to-finality-as-draft-2-0-reaches-milestone/</guid><description><![CDATA[WIMAX and WLAN are not direct competitors.<br><br>As I understand WIMAX requires licensed specturm, where WLAN is unlicensed.<br><br>So, the only one going to give you WIMAX is your carrier. (And I'm sure everyone is happy with thier current billing and service)<br><br>While with WLAn, you still can put a 802.11n hotspot in your home and share that with your neighbors.<br><br>I could be wrong, but I don't see WIMAX replacing WLAN in anyway in the future, unless a version that uses unlicensed spectrum comes out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Monkut]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 14th 2007 10:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 802.11n creeps closer to finality as Draft 2.0 reaches milestone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/802-11n-creeps-closer-to-finality-as-draft-2-0-reaches-milestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/802-11n-creeps-closer-to-finality-as-draft-2-0-reaches-milestone/</guid><description><![CDATA["on track for a planned April 2009 publication of the final IEEE spec"<br><br>Are you just kidding me here or is this for real? I know the IEEE is a very saggy group and takes forever to make the smallest decisions. But April 2009 as an official release date, that is pushing it. I figured itd get a little bit delayed and everything, but that it would come out sometime in 2007.<br><br>So it is def not coming out anytime before 2009?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Guffy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2007 12:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 802.11n creeps closer to finality as Draft 2.0 reaches milestone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/802-11n-creeps-closer-to-finality-as-draft-2-0-reaches-milestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/802-11n-creeps-closer-to-finality-as-draft-2-0-reaches-milestone/</guid><description><![CDATA[April 2009 for final approval is indeed correct.  Yes, IEEE can grind exceedingly slow.  The IEEE 802.11 Working Group has approved Draft 2.0 with over 75%, but in order to go to the next level of balloting, it'll have to get well over 90% approval.  And then, that only to go to Sponsor Balloting, and it has to get over 90% there, as well.  The minimum number of ballots historically was 5, and the maximum was 15 ballots.<br>Also, there is no guarantee that final equipment will work with equipment based on Draft 2.0.  The draft can change throughout this process.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JOATMON]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2007 8:14PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>