<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</guid><description><![CDATA[The real question is how much power do they use and how much faster than a 10,000 RPM 120 GB Hard drive are they?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kev50027]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 14th 2007 1:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</guid><description><![CDATA[if the 64GB is around $100 ill get it, other then that its just not worth it now. at least for me that is. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[totalfixation]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 14th 2007 1:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</guid><description><![CDATA[Question for somebody, if I wanted one of these drives as my main desktop drive, would I have to install windows and all my apps again? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Deezee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 14th 2007 2:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</guid><description><![CDATA[You could always just image your old drive over to the SSD with Ghost or what-have-you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 14th 2007 2:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thats right. Thanks. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Deezee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 14th 2007 2:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've you're afraid of having to reinstall, the alternatives will be more scary for you.  Reinstalling is the easiest for inexperienced users.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 14th 2007 2:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</guid><description><![CDATA[anyone else find it odd that RAM and SSDs follow a binary sizing system (2 4 16 1024 4096 etc) whereas HDDs shoot for (20, 80, 250, 750)10^6?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scabies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 14th 2007 2:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</guid><description><![CDATA[Perhaps RAM and SSDs have binary scaling because they use banks of matched pairs to store data, unlike HDs whose capacity is determined by number of platters and data density. The question will be: do formatted SSDs lose capacity like HDs, like when a 200Gb HD ends up actually being ~183Gb ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PTNYC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 14th 2007 4:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</guid><description><![CDATA[Scabies,  Im not sure how to say it but hard drives are based off of platters thats why they have sizes that goes in 20, 30, 40, ,60, 80, and so one. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[totalfixation]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 14th 2007 5:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wake me up when SSDs become affordable.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 14th 2007 6:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</guid><description><![CDATA[I remember reading a review of the 8gb supertalent ssd thing like this, and dont be expecting some great performance boost. Hell, dont expect ANY performance boost, apparently the thing performs worse than most standard hdds at most things. read for yourself here <a href="http://techreport.com/reviews/2006q3/supertalent-flashide/index.x?pg=1" rel="nofollow">http://techreport.com/reviews/2006q3/supertalent-flashide/index.x?pg=1</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Firebird]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 14th 2007 7:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</guid><description><![CDATA[Where can I buy these SSDs that are always getting articles? I never see them listed online.<br><br>64GB 1.8" drives please.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[waba waba]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 14th 2007 8:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</guid><description><![CDATA[You can buy SSD Drives @ <a href="http://wwww.dvnation.com" rel="nofollow">http://wwww.dvnation.com</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mansa Smith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2007 12:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/14/super-talent-announces-ssds-from-4gb-to-128gb/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is getting exciting, but I really think they should work on replacing the microdrives in  PMPs so that we can get something more reliable which can still play video. That being said, I could easily see these things becoming the main drives, with a few 500GB+ regular drives being used in external cases for easy home backups.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Wicks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2007 11:11AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>