<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[In Finland the vast majority of mechanical locks are rotating-barrel ABLOY (<a href="http://www.abloy.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.abloy.com</a>) locks that are considered much more secure than pin tumbler locks. As far as I know, the most efficient known method of attacking a rotating-barrel lock is crafting a makeshift key from a bar of some soft metal that is inserted into the lock, rotated and then filed at points that have been in contact with the rotating rings inside the lock barrel. As it might sound, this takes considerable time and effort.<br><br>(Disclaimer: I'm not an expert &ndash; I just read stuff, such as <a href="http://www.toool.nl/abloy.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.toool.nl/abloy.pdf</a>.)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Santtu "Japsu" Pajukanta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2007 9:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Very nice article.  In my former life, long, long ago, I was a carpenter and we referred to Kwikset locks as Kwikshit; Schlage was better, but not much.  You could yell hard at them and they would open.  When I did side jobs for a property management company, I could drill out the pins of almost any lock in about a minute.  Medeco was better about key control -- you would have to ask really nice to get someone who stocked their key blanks to make you a copy.  And of course without an anti-jimmy plate or a reinforced strike-plate, most doors could be opened with hardly any damage (or noise) with a bump of the hip.<br><br>Security systems are a complete joke, but only because people don't use them, or use them and set them off, or pay no attention to them when they go off.  I lived on a city street a while back and hard the car-alarm song memorized.  The police take plenty of time to show up at a building whose alarm has gone off more than a few times in the last year.<br><br>So the solution?  We always said you just needed to look harder to get into, and less attractive, than your neighbor (granted, installing locks was how I made money, and all).  Drive down the street -- case your house and your neighbors' -- if yours doesn't look hard to get into, then it's time for some upgrades.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom H]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2007 9:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[So the stuff you can get at Home Depot and Lowe's, the Schlages, Baldwins, and Kwikshits, mechanically they are all identical (5-pin tumblers). So what makes the Baldwins rated ANSI Grade 1, while the Schlages ANSI grade 2, and the kwikys Grade 3? Is it their resistance to Physical attacks like prying and drilling, etc? Because at the end of the day, a Baldwin could just as easily be bumped with the method mentioned above as the Kwiksets.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2007 12:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA["Security systems are a complete joke, but only because people don't use them, or use them and set them off, or pay no attention to them when they go off. I lived on a city street a while back and hard the car-alarm song memorized. The police take plenty of time to show up at a building whose alarm has gone off more than a few times in the last year."<br><br>Car alarms are a completely different animal than home security systems.  A home security system is not about the siren; it really doesn't matter if neighbors ignore it.<br><br>You are right that many municipalities will purposely downgrade the response to a home that is known for false alarms.  But that's not really a damnation of security systems in general; it's a damnation of faulty installations.  Like anything else, a security system needs to be installed properly to work effectively.<br><br>My county, like many others across the US, helps ensure this by issuing security system licenses.  You technically cannot operate a security system that automatically dials the police without a license.  They will come to your house anyway, but they will actually issue you a citation if it's a false alarm and you don't have a license.<br><br>I've had my security system for a year (GE Simon 3) and have never had a false alarm, even with a cat running around (I have motion sensors).  I also never forget to turn it on because it just turns on with a key fob; turning it on is just part of my regular routine of locking the door.  All modern security systems can be used the same way.<br><br>Security is all about layers.  There's no magic bullet.  I look at all these stories (especially during the bump key hysteria a while back) and wonder what people think the intent of a lock actually is.  Locks are not intended to turn your house into a fortified castle - there are many other ways to get into your house if a criminal truly wants to.  Locks are intended to make it more difficult for criminals, and to keep honest people honest.  Most burglaries start with an unlocked door or window.<br><br>Good exterior lighting, deadbolts on all your doors (however good they are), working locks on all your windows and a decent and properly installed security system that's used dilligently will be basically 100% effective at keeping all intruders out of your house.  If you're still paranoid at that point, you may as well just live in an underground bomb shelter for the rest of your life.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2007 7:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Uh oh I have a Kwikset...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2007 10:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[So where do you live Ben?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DEEZNUTZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2007 10:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[This whole business about standards and picking a level of security is sort of, I don't know, complicated. How about this, just give us three locks rated in this order:<br><br>1- When they film the movie about how the slick, professional, European terrorists try to break into your home, they will need to shoot a scene where the charismatic leader has to recruit some autistic genius who is the only one of 3 people on the planet with the ability to pick the kind of locks you have on the front door to your home. Have a character mumble something about "These are the same locks the CIA uses on the doors to the room where they keep nuclear launch codes" or something similar. The key to this lock should look menacing, high tech and just downright evil.<br><br>2- The lock that is still overkill, but not AS overkill as number one listed above. It should still look evil though.<br><br>3- Good enough to keep every crack smoker who watched the YouTube videos about bumping out of your house, but not so amazing that the European terrorists outlined in #1 above would have too much trouble. The lock that most prudent people would install on their front door.<br><br>Speaking of #1, where can someone get some EVVA MCS action here in the US?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Koenig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2007 10:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great idea!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2007 11:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a Kwikset on the main door upstairs and whatever comes on the screen door in the basement. I REALLY DONT DIVE A ----. I have nothing worth value in my home, this computer sucks, and I only have .48 cents in the bank account. Worst cast scenario, they come in, hold me at gunpoint and crack a laugh. I'd help them load up my PC as an excuse to get a new one... eventually, Give them my 3rd gen. iPod, and tell them my phone is pre-paid. They might not get my bus pass though, I'd hide that in the crack of my ---. My Jack Spade bag is the only prize possession i have, and I love it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jaroygilmer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2007 11:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is Ansi Grade 2 good enough for most home uses, or do I have to look specifically for the 156.30 designation?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kagai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2007 12:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[This being a tech gadget site, shouldn't we be discussing more advanced, tamper-proof mechanisms such as fingerprint readers? Those are certainly better... right?<br><br>Right?  ;-)<br><br><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/digital-fingerprint-door-lock-defeated-by-photocopied-print/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/digital-fingerprint-door-lock-defeated-by-photocopied-print/</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ignacio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2007 11:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[The problem is with most biometric (fingerprint) or optical readers is that they often do not interface with an access control system like a simple card reader or keypad does.  Biometric readers are a bit more secure that traditional card readers, but are much more expensive and to be honest... ugly.  While someone can pull a print from a finger and have it read on a biometric reader to gain entry, stealing someone's eye is a bit different.  Optical readers are the most secure, but they are not only expensive they are also very impractical.<br><br>There are new technology standards that have been released for traditional card readers called Government Smart Card FIPS201 (Federal Information Processing Standards) that proves to be much more secure than any card encryption to date.  Check out the leader in proximity card technology, HID www.hidcorp.com, for greater detail.  Also, check out MIFARE and DESFire technologies.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoffrey King]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2007 11:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am an engineer for a security consulting firm in San Francisco that designs large scale security systems for airports, hospitals, and large commercial clients.  Unfortunately, simple mechanical keys are no longer considered secure regardless of the cut.  While we do specify Medeco or Primus cylinders, they are only for non secure areas.  An integrated access control and surveillance system is the best way to secure a door, save for an armed guard posted at each entrance.<br><br>While I think the brief article is interesting, the fact is most law enforcement agencies (FBI, DHS, local police, etc) do not understand how security works or even how to implement it.  The reason is simple; it is not a necessary entity to be a law enforcement officer.  Also, the markets between IT and Security have been merging at ever rapid pace for the past few years and now it commonly takes a network administrator to manage a security system.<br><br>In regards to residential security, a more secure lock maybe more affective against a burglar attempting to pick the lock, however I have never run into a client that had an incident like that.  Most residential burglaries are via a crowbar, breaking a window, or even entering through an open window.  While someone previously commented that most fail to even turn on the alarm system is true, but that nice window or door decal stating that you have an alarm is deterrent enough for the burglar to choose your neighbor instead.<br><br>Check out the ISC West convention in Las Vegas at the end of this month to see the latest and greatest in all ranges of security - from simple residential burglar alarms to facial recognition video analytics software.  Also check out the ASIS show, which I believe is also in Las Vegas this year.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoffrey King]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2007 11:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just because you haven't noticed it, doesn't mean it hasn't happened.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[-bob-]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 23rd 2007 9:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a question: What percentage of residential break-ins are accomplished by bumping or picking a fully-functional standard (Kwikset etc) door lock/deadbolt? I'd guess it's not a very high number, which would make most of this article pointless for the average homeowner. <br><br>Sure, it seems scary to think that your lock can be easily compromised, but unless you have secure doors, plexiglass windows or window bars, AND you remember to always lock the door, the lock is the least worry for a burglar.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2007 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[How to bumb the Mul-T-Lock Interactive:<br><br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xT5QMzF60EE" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xT5QMzF60EE</a><br><br>This key is absolutely not safe, the security items on it and on the MT5 are just for shifting the users.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dalibor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2007 5:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Locks are for honest people.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2007 6:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[""I have a question: What percentage of residential break-ins are accomplished by bumping or picking a fully-functional standard (Kwikset etc) door lock/deadbolt? ""<br><br>They don't know that information because law enforcement does not report it or track it in the reports, it's just like they don't track idiot users on cell phones getting into a wreck or killing someone while they were on the phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MrGutts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2007 7:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA["There's no magic bullet."<br><br><br>i believe that there actually is one. it's called a .45 ACP   ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[b.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2007 2:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[The locks don't matter much when many homes are outfitted with wood or fiberglass entry doors that do not offer much security.  Most doors can be opened with a swift kick or a battery powered drill through the door itself.  Not to mention that one could also get through glass windows/patio doors with ease.  As far as I'm concerned, get an alarm system if you are worried about getting burgled.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2007 8:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Probably the most important point of this is not about the locks directly, its about the insurance company response to a theft where no apparent force was employed to gain entry to the premises.  If the police file a report with 'no sign of forced entry' your insurance company has an out to not deliver on your coverage.  Bumpkeying and simple lock picking are your biggest worries here, when they are done properly, the leave little to no trace (that a policeman is going to find).  Get a lock that forces physical desctruction.  A good medeco or primus is sufficient, or perhaps some of the ones mentioned above which don't employ typical pin-tumbler mechanisms.  <br><br><br> ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[earthling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2007 8:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree, locks are for honest people.  If the door is too hard to break into/through then the window will be broken.  Lets be serious about this, if a thief wants in they are getting in.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[K]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2007 10:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[A friend of mine's house has been broken into about half a dozen times, and only once did the burglars try to get in by jimmying the lock--unsuccessfully. They ruined the lock, but didn't compromise it. They ended up getting in by forcing a window.<br><br>My own security system is the best that money can buy: I live in a neighborhood where everyone knows and looks out for each other, where several neighbors are home during the day and can keep an eye on things, and where everyone feels as safe outdoors as in-. Granted, the price of a house in such a neighborhood is a bit more than most are willing to spend for good security, but security was about the last thing on our minds when we moved in.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2007 11:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[I also agree with "K" if they want in they will find a way.<br><br>So we went with the Kwikset because it was cheap and easy to install. Yes, I'd be just as pissed off as the next guy if my crap was stolen but at least by buying a cheap lock set I have saved money towards my next computer. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[socko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2007 12:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[My lock is spelled D-O-G<br><br>One German Shepard and one Alaskan Malamute.  Did you watch the Mythbusters dog episode? I guarantee the guy is going next door to the ANSI unbreakable lock, and just breaking the damn window!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2007 1:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[A security company sign, accompanied by a 'Forget the Dog, Beware of owner' sign and a sign that reads 'Protected by Smith & Wesson security systems' seems to have done well for me so far.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[A.J.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2007 3:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Lockdown: Locked, but maybe secure (part 2)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/19/the-lockdown-locked-but-maybe-secure-part-2/</guid><description><![CDATA[You want some good, low-tech security?  Put a dog food and water bowl on your deck and get a dog-related welcome mat for the front door.<br>:)<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[engadget]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2007 12:28AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>