<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for More dirt on Intel's Penryn / Nehalem architecture</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/29/more-dirt-on-intels-penryn-nehalem-architecture/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for More dirt on Intel's Penryn / Nehalem architecture</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on More dirt on Intel's Penryn / Nehalem architecture]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/29/more-dirt-on-intels-penryn-nehalem-architecture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/29/more-dirt-on-intels-penryn-nehalem-architecture/</guid><description><![CDATA[Best news of the month by far. At least on engadget (other great news = Adobe CS3).<br><br>I cant wait to see benchmarks on the penryn processors, in a years+ time i know ill have the option of upgrading to faster xeon processors for my mac pro as they are compatible. However, I wonder if intel will be able to produce a 6 or 8 core penryn chip....?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[helloUser]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2007 6:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on More dirt on Intel's Penryn / Nehalem architecture]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/29/more-dirt-on-intels-penryn-nehalem-architecture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/29/more-dirt-on-intels-penryn-nehalem-architecture/</guid><description><![CDATA[Also note the integrated memory controller on nehalem. Took that one out of the AMD part bucket. Very smart though.<br>Don't be so sure about the mac-pro upgrade path. Yes Penryn is a LGA775 part, however the FSB is jumping to 1600 mhz so new chipsets are likely required.<br>(I hope not, My Asus P5B seems so new...)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2007 1:06PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
