<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Olympus Stylus 1000 digicam gets reviewed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/02/olympus-stylus-1000-digicam-gets-reviewed/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Olympus Stylus 1000 digicam gets reviewed</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Olympus Stylus 1000 digicam gets reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/02/olympus-stylus-1000-digicam-gets-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/02/olympus-stylus-1000-digicam-gets-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Olympus puts more money into their marketing department rather than R & D.  But still...is it really true that the best Olympus' marketing department can put out are stupid stickers saying Digital Image Stabilization when consumers are getting smarter?  Or are they targetting the Kodak/HP crowd?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2007 12:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Olympus Stylus 1000 digicam gets reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/02/olympus-stylus-1000-digicam-gets-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/02/olympus-stylus-1000-digicam-gets-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[$400 is too much to spend on a point and shoot camera in 2007.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[humpty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2007 1:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Olympus Stylus 1000 digicam gets reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/02/olympus-stylus-1000-digicam-gets-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/02/olympus-stylus-1000-digicam-gets-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[How interesting...<br><br>I've had a little bit of a play with this camera (as well as the rest of the new Olympus line-up), but here in Australia we sell them under the model "Olympus Mju 1000". It's a good looking camera, well constructed and good value for money. Still, I would rather something like the Mju 770, waterproof to 10m (33ft).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DAZA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2007 1:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Olympus Stylus 1000 digicam gets reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/02/olympus-stylus-1000-digicam-gets-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/02/olympus-stylus-1000-digicam-gets-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[It takes terrible pictures for $400.<br><br><a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/OS1000/YPC040529.HTM" rel="nofollow">http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/OS1000/YPC040529.HTM</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2007 4:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Olympus Stylus 1000 digicam gets reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/02/olympus-stylus-1000-digicam-gets-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/02/olympus-stylus-1000-digicam-gets-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[er.. I must be missing something, the picture in that link looks great - what's wrong with it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Raz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2007 6:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Olympus Stylus 1000 digicam gets reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/02/olympus-stylus-1000-digicam-gets-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/02/olympus-stylus-1000-digicam-gets-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[The image is very crisp but if you look at the background it should have shown the green leaves on the plant better. The black levels or contrast is not all that great. $400 no way try $200-250 for Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ1 5.0 MP Dig. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2007 12:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Olympus Stylus 1000 digicam gets reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/02/olympus-stylus-1000-digicam-gets-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/02/olympus-stylus-1000-digicam-gets-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[On the left side of the fire hydrant, the edges are are blurred and has a purple haze on it.  The other pictures on the site from this camera does not look crisp to me.  But if it works for you, I'm not stopping you from buying this camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2007 1:08PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
