<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Australians conquer bike safety, forest fires</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/07/australians-conquer-bike-safety-forest-fires/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Australians conquer bike safety, forest fires</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Australians conquer bike safety, forest fires]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/07/australians-conquer-bike-safety-forest-fires/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/07/australians-conquer-bike-safety-forest-fires/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br>This helmet is designed for countries that drive on the Left side of the road, like Australia. The ear drop is on the wrong side for America. It would muffle the sound of traffic. Perhaps they will make a change for the rest of us.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ybike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 7th 2007 3:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Australians conquer bike safety, forest fires]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/07/australians-conquer-bike-safety-forest-fires/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/07/australians-conquer-bike-safety-forest-fires/</guid><description><![CDATA[More than likely they would, since that is the whole point of it having only one speaker. The only thing that I am disappointed by with this is a lack of solar to power it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[infectedarea]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 10th 2007 6:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Australians conquer bike safety, forest fires]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/07/australians-conquer-bike-safety-forest-fires/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/07/australians-conquer-bike-safety-forest-fires/</guid><description><![CDATA[Waaaaaa! Something develop for the Aussies first! Lump it, Yank!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[grizzly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 10th 2007 7:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Australians conquer bike safety, forest fires]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/07/australians-conquer-bike-safety-forest-fires/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/07/australians-conquer-bike-safety-forest-fires/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pulse Bicycle Safety Helmet? Reading the title it can be assumed that a product has been designed to improve bicycle safety, but it is not. When cycling with a friend, both can be checking road hazards while talking. Unfortunately, talking with a friend on the phone while cycling is not safe, no matter how innovative the design of the product may be. However, this concept is very convenient. It allow the rider to talk to friends without having to search for his phone while not riding.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Moe Abe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 7th 2007 6:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Australians conquer bike safety, forest fires]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/07/australians-conquer-bike-safety-forest-fires/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/07/australians-conquer-bike-safety-forest-fires/</guid><description><![CDATA[hate to say this, but integrating existing products with anything is not innovation. Nor flexibility. How will this be adjusted for different ears/ comfort levels/ perspiration levels ? Basics like price and need/want come up too. <br><br>Helmets involved in a collision need to be tossed out. Toss it out and buy another expensive helmet? You see so much "this is supposedly cool" products out there, but I think most of them have no chance of survival on the market because they simply ignore usability and need basics, instead focusing on "high tech" for the sake of high-tech. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tekdroid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 7th 2007 6:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Australians conquer bike safety, forest fires]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/07/australians-conquer-bike-safety-forest-fires/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/07/australians-conquer-bike-safety-forest-fires/</guid><description><![CDATA[@roid<br><br>Your right, when in any way damaged a helmet has to be thrown away (or continued to be worn if your an idiot) however, from what I understand the 'ear plug' is able to be removed so all you would need is a new helmet not the full system. Also, what would be better is having the control on the handlebars as a clip on module.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 7th 2007 10:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Australians conquer bike safety, forest fires]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/07/australians-conquer-bike-safety-forest-fires/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/07/australians-conquer-bike-safety-forest-fires/</guid><description><![CDATA[This helmet maybe is good voor our fellow cityzens, but for more it ain't good anymore. With conventional helmets you pay more for more holes. Thats normal, because you need good ventilation when cycling.<br><br>This helmet has any holes. So thats a lot of swet in Australia...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ottovds]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2007 3:34AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
