<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Sidekick iD reviewed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-reviewed/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Sidekick iD reviewed</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sidekick iD reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[The SideKick itself is a nice idea (especially for younger people), nonetheless, I don't really see why they bother creating a lower end model.<br>The SK3 is fine already (you can always buy one from eBay or Amazon, cheapish.) and in my opinion the unlimited IM/TXT/Internet package is too expensive, simply because of the fact that you also have to purchase a seperate Voice package. *Whew*<br>If you can afford the $20 monthly data package for the SKiD and the 20-30 dollar phone bill, I fail to see why they couldn't afford a SK3.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RyS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 13th 2007 1:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sidekick iD reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[This would be perfect if it included bluetooth.  Leaving that out is a no-go nowadays.  I could care less about data packages, web-surfing etc., because this phone would be great for messaging.  But I can't deal with wires in the car, and NY law says we need a hands-free kit, so this is O-U-T.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 13th 2007 1:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sidekick iD reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[This should have included support for EDGE.  If you're going to strip out bluetooth, camera, mp3 player and expandable memory, then you should at least include support for EDGE.  This is basically a Sidekick 2 without the camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam K]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 13th 2007 2:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sidekick iD reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[You have to understand, "you people" who wish it still had BT. The Sk had ONE PROFILE for BT, and that was a headset. What a waste. PRetending you really need a BT headset for any practical reason is asinine. Say hello to 4 years ago.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PEZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 13th 2007 5:38PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
