<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Your average inkjet can now print Super 8 / 16mm film</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Your average inkjet can now print Super 8 / 16mm film</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Your average inkjet can now print Super 8 / 16mm film]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</guid><description><![CDATA[i wonder what film it was that he printed?....<br>haha a whole new world of piracy download the file and print off the movie<br>i like it<br><br>(first post)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2007 7:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Your average inkjet can now print Super 8 / 16mm film]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</guid><description><![CDATA[While I don't share his passion for the 'film' I do appreciate the work he put into this. We've all had moments when a lackluster project has come back to life with a thought of simplicity. I can wait till my light bulb switches on again.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[StolnSol]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2007 8:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Your average inkjet can now print Super 8 / 16mm film]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</guid><description><![CDATA[If the video quality was terrible, then what's the point? Waste of time.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shmoe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2007 8:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Your average inkjet can now print Super 8 / 16mm film]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's an interesting idea, but even extending the format to 35mm, with 300ppi printer, we are talking about approx. 400x300 resolution... <br><br>One way of speeding up the tedious process of cutting holes for the sprockets could be to be a cutter for ring binders.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Crayola]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2007 8:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Your average inkjet can now print Super 8 / 16mm film]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</guid><description><![CDATA["That's an interesting idea, but even extending the format to 35mm, with 300ppi printer, we are talking about approx. 400x300 resolution..."<br><br>I have an *old* Epson printer (Stylus Color 777, circa 2000-2001) and it has a max resolution of 2880x720. And that was a really inexpensive printer back then...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ignacio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2007 11:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Your average inkjet can now print Super 8 / 16mm film]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</guid><description><![CDATA[Some people have WAY too much time on their hands...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2007 9:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Your average inkjet can now print Super 8 / 16mm film]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</guid><description><![CDATA[could make an interesting film effect (as though premiere couldn't already do that...)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuckles McGee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2007 9:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Your average inkjet can now print Super 8 / 16mm film]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</guid><description><![CDATA[The sprocket holes are crucial - if you do them by hand, there's absolutely no point to the rest of the exercise.  It looks kind of cool, but I'd rather use a Final Cut plugin to simulate it.  I'd have really been inpressed if the printed sound track worked.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon Tooke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2007 11:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Your average inkjet can now print Super 8 / 16mm film]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</guid><description><![CDATA[Those often quoted numbers are dots per inch not pixel per inch. A monochromatic inkjet dot couldn't be more than 2 bit colour depth, hence the effective pixel per inch could be much less. Dedicated photo printers are quoted with pixel per inch. 300ppi is as good as prints on glossy magazine.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Crayola]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2007 11:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Your average inkjet can now print Super 8 / 16mm film]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thank god he "discovered" the dimensions for those top secret film types.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PDubNYC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2007 11:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Your average inkjet can now print Super 8 / 16mm film]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</guid><description><![CDATA[You are right, I misread ppi as dpi.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ignacio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2007 2:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Your average inkjet can now print Super 8 / 16mm film]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmm... he'd have to extend to 70mm... but I doubt many have a 70mm projector sitting around at home...<br><br>But cool idea and work, looks good too. I like the quality, pretty old school.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kadajawi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2007 11:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Your average inkjet can now print Super 8 / 16mm film]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</guid><description><![CDATA[I did this back in 2001 when I was working with a direct to film (i.e. paint on film) animation group called Crackpot Crafters.  The only difference was that I then came up with a new process of doing it where you print onto injet temporary tattoo kits and xfer them onto prepunched film.  Both have this silly grainy quality you're going for...  if you like that sort of thing.<br> ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wii]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2007 12:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Your average inkjet can now print Super 8 / 16mm film]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow!  The quality sucked!  I would like to see this done again in a couple years with a better printer.  The idea is really cool.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[t-bone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2007 12:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Your average inkjet can now print Super 8 / 16mm film]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't mind the quality of the film, it's not the quality that he was going for.  It's the process and with some tweaking he could make this project repeatable without a huge time loss.  I'm imagining some sort of pizza cutter with a wheel full of sprocket cutters on one side and a film slicer on the other... Cut and punch at the same time.  <br><br>Very cool.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SeanMM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2007 12:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Your average inkjet can now print Super 8 / 16mm film]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</guid><description><![CDATA[1337~ that is so today, man.  I mean with nonlinear video editing it takes SO much time to edit... the retro 8mm film is far superior.<br><br>wtf?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Champion]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2007 6:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Your average inkjet can now print Super 8 / 16mm film]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</guid><description><![CDATA[Interesting project. Quite cute. I'm just glad an "artist" didn't find out about this first. S/he would have achieved great acclaim in the art world by printing out digital movies (like star wars) and sticking on an explanation like the juxtaposition of the new digital trends and the old film techniques, etc etc. Snooty art critics would be standing around fondling their dyed goatees, saying things like "powerful" and "socially important" inbetween sipping their pretentious wine. Gleh.<br><br>So, yeah. I'm glad this guy is doing it instead.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Magnulus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2007 7:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Your average inkjet can now print Super 8 / 16mm film]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/30/your-average-inkjet-can-now-print-super-8-16mm-film/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hi,<br>Being a novice involved in some important research I am hoping one of your regulars could tell me how I would be able to make a positive print from an old frame of 16mm film.  There are only two frames of this very rare footage. One has a picture of two uniformed men. To identify the uniform etc I would guess I would need a 5*7<br>positive print. I have no specialist equipment and I'm wondering if a regular "Photo<br>Print/Developing" shop could do this with ease?<br><br>Thanks in Advance<br><br>William]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[William]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 22nd 2007 11:47PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
