<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for HP cooking Santa Rosa into Compaq 6510b and 6710b laptops</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for HP cooking Santa Rosa into Compaq 6510b and 6710b laptops</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP cooking Santa Rosa into Compaq 6510b and 6710b laptops]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</guid><description><![CDATA[Would someone please clarify what exactly Santa Clara will mean to laptops??<br><br>I was under the impression that is was the next Centrino chipset and would include beefed up integrated graphics to handle Vista better.... but the article indicated the old IG chip.<br><br>Please fill me in as my friend wants a laptop now and I thought waiting for Santa Rosa in a month would be the right move.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Sundy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 1st 2007 2:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP cooking Santa Rosa into Compaq 6510b and 6710b laptops]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</guid><description><![CDATA[If I recall right the existing is the GM950, on a GM945 graphics chipset.  The new one will be the X3100 on a GM965 chipset.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Muu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 1st 2007 2:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP cooking Santa Rosa into Compaq 6510b and 6710b laptops]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</guid><description><![CDATA[Would someone clarify why HP still makes Compaq-branded computers??<br><br>For the love of god, let it die already.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paloooz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 1st 2007 3:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP cooking Santa Rosa into Compaq 6510b and 6710b laptops]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</guid><description><![CDATA[Compaq are cheaper than the HP based on the same configuration... Don't ask me why...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ayle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 1st 2007 3:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP cooking Santa Rosa into Compaq 6510b and 6710b laptops]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</guid><description><![CDATA[HP killed off some of its product names post merger. HP computers that say compaq are business only and the home version is the Pavillion lines.... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 1st 2007 4:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP cooking Santa Rosa into Compaq 6510b and 6710b laptops]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's a damn good looking wallpaper. Not so sure about the laptop itself...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric V]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 1st 2007 8:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP cooking Santa Rosa into Compaq 6510b and 6710b laptops]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</guid><description><![CDATA[Both models are listed in the French May HP list price. There seem to be 2 models of each, the 6710b being cheaper than the 6510b (??):<br>T7100 - 1Gb/120Gb: 6510b is 989€ / 6710b is 899€<br>T7300 - 1Gb/160Gb: 6510b is 1069€ / 6710b is 999€<br>Availibity seems to be for May 21st.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 2nd 2007 5:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP cooking Santa Rosa into Compaq 6510b and 6710b laptops]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</guid><description><![CDATA[Engadget, you cease to be a source of tech info when your terminology degrades into crap like "WXGA or WSXGA+".<br><br>This *GA alphabet soup died in the '90s, thankfully.  Why start a new generation of meaningless drivel, and in the process REMOVE information from your stories?  Tell us the damned resolution IN NUMBERS.  How many characters are you saving by writing "WSXGA+" instead of NNNNxNNNN?  In case you can't count: THREE.  Three characters saved, and readers not served.<br><br>Nice work.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Information Central]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 4th 2007 5:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP cooking Santa Rosa into Compaq 6510b and 6710b laptops]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</guid><description><![CDATA[You know what ? It's commonly used. Really really common. If you don't know it, google it ;)<br><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WSXGA" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WSXGA</a>+]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ondra Soukup]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 6th 2007 4:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP cooking Santa Rosa into Compaq 6510b and 6710b laptops]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/hp-cooking-santa-rosa-into-compaq-6510b-and-6710b-laptops/</guid><description><![CDATA[Um, no.  First of all, there's no agreement on what this crap means:<br><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wide_XGA" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wide_XGA</a><br><br>Second, there's no excuse for deliberately wasting readers' time and reducing the clarity of written communication.<br><br>So again, why use this garbage, when it only saves three characters, and does not even provide accurate information?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Information Central]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 8th 2007 7:24PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
