<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's a lot of workers... Say it isn't so.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy K.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 12:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[this is what's going to happen when you sell your company to the Chinese.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kingofwale]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 12:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why don't they just fire everyone? Since laying off workers increases profits, the it follows that if you got rid of everyone not in executive management in the company (like the telephone sanitizers and other non-critical workers) then the company would theoretically have almost infinite profitability.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Jonze]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 12:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[this rumor was proven false on digg.<br><br>apparently theres only 110,000 IBM employees in the US;  how are they going to let go almost their entire workforce?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MaX PL and the 360 r4pe Tr4iN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 12:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[It makes sense to me. Guy X wants to do it for less, you give the work to him, your profits are up, everyone wins (except for Guy Y, who should learn to be more competitive). Hire people competitively, no matter what country they live in. Money!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuckles McGee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 12:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, you really have swallowed that whole crap about capitalism being the savior of humanity. You unrestrained capitalists only see money not the nation or it's people. Why are you defending an entitity that would have no problem putting you and your family on the streets to save a few bucks? More competitive? Your ancestors fought for hundreds of years fighting for worker's rights and decent pay that is why we have such a standard of living. But nowadays companies, mostly because of globalization and loyalty only to profits, can circumvent this and hire peoples who would work for close to nothing. The only way to be 'competetive' is to demand severly less compensation or in other words go back to the working conditions of the 19th century. How is this benificial to the nation, or the world, in the long-run? But someone such as yourself with such a limited understanding of the issue and being a unthinking cheerleader of unrestrictive capitalism will never see this... that is until it is your job's turn to be shipped overseas...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 5:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[The problem is when everyone in the biggest consumer nation in the world becomes too poor to buy the products anymore, after everyone gets laid off.  So yeah, the stock goes up as earning reports increase, but then you've got 100,000 people out of work who wont be buying any IBM products anytime soon.<br><br>It is the responsibility of a business in this country to employ workers in this country, and not only that, it's generally in their best interests.  Its frightening how this trend is ever increasing in this nation, and it's a problem that needs to be solved.  If you want to operate a business in this country and you want to sell your product here, then you need to focus at least a good deal of your labor here.  If we held these companies to a decision, either operate your business here and employ a decent number of American workers, or your products will be banned from the country, how many of these layoff stories would we be hearing about?  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 2:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm sure this will have a pretty big impact on the economy, at least locally.<br>But as a ThinkPad fan, I'm also worried about the quality of the brand going down the toilet.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 1:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[Rod,<br><br>The brand got flushed the nanosecond they sold it to Lenovo .  Have you see the current models.  If not go look...<a href="http://shop.lenovo.com/us/notebooks/" rel="nofollow">http://shop.lenovo.com/us/notebooks/</a>  they turned on of the best, debatable of course, laptops in the industry into a bloated piece of shit.  Everyone who let that deal go through at IBM should be taken out back, placed on their knees, blindfolded, and shot.  The ThinkPad line is dead to me.  I will hold my T41 tightly as I remember the glory days of the Thinkpad before Lenovo squat over it and took a nice big shat.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 3:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[>apparently theres only 110,000 IBM employees in the US; how are they going to let go almost their entire workforce?<br><br><br><br>hmmm, by moving to company to China? YOu do know that IBM is owned by the Chinese right?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kingofwale]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 1:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[Indeed, it's not really possible for them to let go of that many people considering they'd have to hire that many very quickly due to it being almost their entire US work force.<br><br>I'm getting sick and tired of all these businesses abandoning us for their own greed, it's ironic so many left my city and only the Asian-owned stayed, if our military base had closed we'd be a ghost town. Thank God for protesting, am I right?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Revrant2394]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 1:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[@2<br>actually i think Lenovo only bought the IBM thinkpad division.. IBM itself is not owned by Lenovo.<br><br>anyone can confirm this?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 1:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA["actually i think Lenovo only bought the IBM thinkpad division.. IBM itself is not owned by Lenovo."<br><br>Actually, they bought the entire IBM PC division, which also includes the ThinkCentre line. Although obviously the ThinkPad brand was the most valuable asset in the PC division.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[myscrnnm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 11:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[The company may profit in the short term, but in the end, outsourcing hurts everyone.  When workers are laid off they can no longer buy things.  Telling people to get more education and go out and find a better paying job is short-sighted.  Not everyone is cut out to be a high-paid corporate executive, government official, or rocket scientist.  This Jib-Jab video pretty tells it all regarding outsourcing and bringing in cheap goods from overseas:<br><br><a href="http://www.jibjab.com/originals/originals/jibjab/movieid/122" rel="nofollow">http://www.jibjab.com/originals/originals/jibjab/movieid/122</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dosguy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 1:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[Alex: Yes. IBM sold its PC division to Lenovo. IBM is a huge company, and the PC division was only a part of that and unprofitable to boot. IBM didn't actually sell "IBM" to Lenovo - just the Thinkpad and Thinkcentre brands.<br><br>Should be apparent to anyone able to use Google.<br><br>Sounds like FUD to me. I don't believe IBM will be laying off 100,000 workers - that's way too much.  IBM is certainly smart enough to not fire everybody in hopes of hiring an equal number of Indians - most of what IBM does these days is consulting and services and most of those jobs can't be outsourced to anywhere. Maybe they'll move internal stuff like accounting to low cost countries. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nikster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 1:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sorry, but that article is dead-on accurate with the exception of the actual number to be laid off.  The YE07 figure will be closer to the 20,000-25,000 range.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sracer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 8:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's impossible for U.S. workers to be competitive for jobs in a global workforce. According to the U.S. Census, in 2005, the median U.S. household in come was (US)$46.326 (per year). 98.2% of the world population earns less than $46326.0 per year. Goodbye jobs, America!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[obiwan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 1:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's always amazing how many knee-jerk postings go up after sensationalist news like this.<br>When the actual news is cleared up, it would be no surprise, however, to find out that it goes something like, "Including retirements, IBM will be letting go of close to 100k people over the course of the next 10 years."<br>Still sound like a lot?  Anyone that has ever worked for Intel knows that they regularly weed out under-performers as a matter of course. Doesn't mean those guys necessarily suck. Just means the bar is set high. Then if there is need to fill in the gap, they hire more.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darwin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 1:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hello,<br><br>Wow is Lou Dobbs ever going to be steaming mad when he hears this!<br><br>His head might implode or something...<br><br>JA<br><br><a href="http://www.supplychainnetwork.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.supplychainnetwork.com/</a><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Ashcroft]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 1:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[As a research and consulting company, there's no need for employees that don't know how to think or do menial tasks when you can pay someone else a fifth of the wage...I highly doubt they're letting go of really useful people in R&D, and if they do, well that's a shame.<br><br>The Americans among us that have no creativity and have no skills are the ones that tend to go first. It's just a matter of what's good for business.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kev]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 2:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[There should be a line on the bottom of Huffy bikes at walmart that says "Invented in America (now made in China)".<br><br>Laying off 100,000 employees is never a good thing...time to dump that tech and real estate stock. Who is going to buy all the crap if we loose our jobs?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chovy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 3:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[As the world gets smaller, international trade of all kinds increases. This includes the trading of labor for wages. It is oceans and transportation costs that created divisions of wealth along national boundaries, not manifest destiny. In fact, one of the very things that *did* help to create great wealth in America was the preservation of relatively free trade. What we see now is only the same act on a larger stage. Levels of wealth around the planet will converge. It is bad for us, but very good for a lot of other people. Save a good portion of your wages, plan for the future, and consider that your wealth is in your loved ones, your health, your security and your freedom. Because it will not forever be in your international buying power. There are not, really, any mysteries in this process, nor are there any ways out of it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 3:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[What in the hell does IBM even make these days?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiffany]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 3:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[Services.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 3:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[And shitty software.  Lotus Notes.  Much potential.  Shitty implementation.  I say this as someone who admins Lotus Notes.  The only saving grace of the damn thing is that it saved our ass from the bagillion viruses that plagued Lookout over the years.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 3:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[Err... how about some of the fastest blade servers/bladecenters on the market (HS20's/HS25's) 2 years before Dell, Gateway or HP could even try to compete. Fiber Backplanes etc.. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 6th 2007 9:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well said Tiffany!  I was asking myself the same thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2007 1:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[LOL. <br><br>How bout the chips in the PS3, XBOX, and Wii, not to mention a ton of mainframe servers. Anyone in the know will agree that the AS/400, RS/6000, and zSeries line of machines are workhorses.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[agelgamer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 8th 2007 7:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[IT IS A QUESTION OF LEADERSHIP and the leadership in this country stinks like four day old fish right now. And no just because of corruption, cronyism and the war either but a culture that favors big business, greed and short term profits. Case in point - Why would I give a company massive tax breaks as a reward for outsourcing jobs? Shouldn't it be the other way around? Now I'm no economist but it seems to me like simple math (1 worker in India =  15k US, 1 US work = 25k -6k in tax breaks and other incentives = 19k). That American worker at 4k difference sure looks better don't they. The 4k becomes negligible since you have employment and taxes on those wages and you've hired and American who is able to buy goods and service. Doesn't all of this help to drive the economy long term?<br><br>So please spare me the crap about "training the American worker for high tech jobs" as education funding is cut.  Oh, and the Indians and Chinese aren't exactly picking lettuce in California so don't try and feed us the other BS line of "they do jobs that Americans wont do". They are doing the high tech jobs. Yea people, keep voting for the party of fake Patriots that rewards corporate greed at the expense of hard working Americans. MAN, HOW DID YOU LET THE FOOL YOU INTO THINKING THEY GAVE A RATZ AZZ ABOUT YOU THE AMERICAN WORKER? THEY DON'T LOVE YOU HO's!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frankenstein Black]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 3:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[Notes is great product to use, is, in fact, as Outlook.  If they weren't good products then they wouldn't be dominating the market the way they do.  Anyone can always write something better but they haven't, because if they had, that's what everyone would be using, just as IE eventually toppled Netscape when it became better than Netscape, just as Google became the standard for search engines even though it started later.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BMG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2007 11:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually this is not fud and the numbers may actually be valid.  Let me first say that I know what I know because my mother works as a subcontractor for IBM and she was one of the few kept by the first wave of let-gos which occured earlier this week.<br><br>So about the number...IBM may not have that many actual employees but if you count all the subcontractors they use, the numbers may add up.  I know the majority of the people let go earlier this week were subcontractors (and there were a lot of them).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 4:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[Everyone seems to be forgetting that the US market is dwarfed by the emerging middle class in China and India. These large corporations are drooling at the prospect of tapping into these large markets and could really care less if the US market is not that big and who they hurt with all of this outsourcing. As long as the share holders get their profits they don't care where the market is just as long as someone is buying their services and products. I don't see any of these companies halting or even slowing down the out sourcing; there is just too much money for the greedy bas**** to make by sending our jobs over seas.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[B Parker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 19th 2007 2:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[Our ancestors fought long and hard for FREEDOM and EQUALITY! Let me put it this way, you are a hater of capitalism yet living standards constantly increase under the capitalist system. Europe has a socialist system whereby money is taken from the rich and given to the poor. The government acts as a robin hood in the name of equality and attempts to redistribute wealth according to what the government sees fit and not the market. And then what other systems do we have in place...hmm. Communism? You probably are one to promote that but if you want to maintain a living standard that the U.S. enjoys you probably wouldn't want that, assuming you're a sane individual. Anything else? No and YOU HAVE NO ALTERNATIVES! Why is it that people who promote socialist ideals claim justice and fairness of the working class while taking rights away from the business that do all the work and hire all the people? This is AMERICA where everyone should have the right to do what they please as long as the rights of others are not trampled upon. You act as if big business obtains its revenue through force and extortion. You're kind of thinking is not suited to the realities of today and so people with your thinking get held back and expect someone else, like the gov't, to protect you individually and provide for you. Well, guess what: the government that provides everything can take away everything. Government's job is to protect the system. Gov't is run by humans, not a god so it doesn't answer individual prayers. Gov'ts that have attempted to do so are call Soviets and North Koreans. Personally, I've been laid off from two jobs in my short time on this planet that went overseas but I don't whine and complain about my lot in life. Hell, even manufacturing jobs are starting to go from China to India! Should China then try to protect its workers by putting a stranglehold on its economy? When big government interferes and starts to meddle into the affairs of anyone, including businesses of all sizes, then that's when civil liberties are being trampled upon regardless of size in terms of employees or revenue. Fighting for workers rights is one thing, fighting to tell people how they should run their business is another. And I'll bet you have no empirical evidence that shows living conditions in the United States is declining because it's NOT! The economy keeps growing because the capitalist system makes sure that resources are not wasted and allocated to its most efficient use. We in America have the right to do whatever and if that means we all have a shot at even being another Google things are great here. The societies most free are the most SUCCESSFUL. And I have every empirical evidence that shows that. It is no accident that China grows when the gov't releases its hold on its people. What incentive does gov't have to make sure spending is not wasted? Are you kidding me! Gov't has no incentive WHATSOEVER in making sure spending is allocated appropriately. How could they??? They are literally gang-raping everyone from the working class man to big business. You work and the government takes money from you. And when business move over to other countries for lower tax rates it's because they're protecting what BELONGS to THEM. Who are you to say how businesses should be run? And if they lay people off then so what?? Americans are creatively smart and are tough people who can weather a storm like this "economic restructuring". I may have lost my job a few times but I sure as hell will not be loosing my freedoms.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kompression]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 2:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[Let's see...<br>a company named International Business Machines is repositioning it's work force to be more global.<br>I'm supposed to be shocked becaaaause...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Parks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 6:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wrote a paper 10 years ago about how the American Stock Market and the voting shareholders would destroy America. Yeh, for me that I was right...Unfortunately, this is now the beginning of the. end for millions and millions of American jobs and the middle class as we know it. If my theories are right hundreds of stock brokers will be slaughtered as a huge backlash from the American population realizes there is no difference between greed and capitalism.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mrsalty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 8:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[I believe alot of companies still think that downsizing is a great way to improve profitability. In this case the downsizing is done in favor of replacing workers with cheaper labor overseas. The problem is that these companies are neither effective nor efficient and use downsizing or outsourcing as an excuse to eliminate jobs. Becoming more effective and efficient is the solution so you don't have to downsize. You would think that CEOs and CFOs who make millions of dollars would want to save jobs but it seems like they take the easy way out every time.<br><br>jake<br><a href="http://www.layoffspace.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.layoffspace.com</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 8:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[Americans made the choice to skate through school, avoid the merest hint of math or science and spend much of their day surfing while on the job.  US industry has been warning about this for over 20 years, now watch what happens when you have no technically competent people in today's world.<br><br>Read the quality of the writing on these comment pages and ask yourself how many you would hire.  And this is a somewhat technical forum.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Raymond]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 8:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[It may be cheaper in the short term, that is until they start demanding more money over there.. then what will they do?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[james]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 7:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[Jake, interesting but flies in the face of reality.<br><br>IBM already has 65% of its 400K employee workforce outside the US; I doubt that this is simply an "excuse" for anything, but instead simply a function of the realities of a new, truely global, marketplace<br><br>Saying that they just need to become more efficient is also disingenuous.  First off this is, inherently, a first step in becoming more efficient; second, when other companies / industries take steps to become more efficient they get pushback from organizations like the SEIU that are more interested in retaining jobs than ensuring long-term competiveness.<br><br>Wake up, it's a new world.  The only person responsible for you is you.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[stan lee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 9:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA["apparently theres only 110,000 IBM employees in the US; how are they going to let go almost their entire workforce?"<br><br>It's called India and China. They're smarter and cheaper than you.<br><br>Next question?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 11:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's not just the cost of employees' salaries that IBM is seeking to reduce, it's also their tax burden.  Support the FairTax, if you're tired of American jobs going overseas.  www.fairtax.org]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Enrique]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 12:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[With first hand knowledge of IBM's Global Services division and its use of Indian programmers, they are not smarter than Americans.  They continually need hand holding by American IBM workers to get the job done.  People from 3rd world economies have no capacity to know how "services" in 1st world countries are suppose to work.  Sure they can be taught how to program, but that doesn't mean they can efficiently apply that knowledge to systems that ends up being used in businesses around the world.  Also, as far as cost goes, when you break down the numbers, they are only marginally cheaper than American programmers.  The biggest problem is retention in India.  You end up spending alot of resources (= money) to recruit, train, and support an Indian programmer just to have them leave a couple of months later because another company is offering $1 more an hour.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 11:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[I concur completely.  Depending on the timing my my mom sometimes has to hand tickets off to the indians (or receives tickets from them).  When this happens she's always guaranteed to have more work to do because they almost never do anything right.  Plus she has to work harder to figure just what the hell they did/didn't do so she can take the next step.<br><br>From what I understand there have been some services groups that were switched over to LEAN earlier this year (late last year?).  Essentially the idea is to drop remote/telecommuting and centralize such that every body works out of one of five(?) locations throughout the US.  Obviously, along with this, they plan on dropping a tremendous number of the services workforce.  My mom talked to a lady who's group was one of the early ones to go LEAN...and she said that, as a result, they've actually had to hire more people to support their existing clients than they originally had when decentralized.<br><br>Suffice to say, my mom's had a hell of a week wondering if she was going to get axed, but she's too smart and she works too hard while not giving herself enough credit (she's one of those go-the-extra-mile people).  Unfortunately for her, before the others on her project got laid off for LEAN, IBM had already come down with a decree of "no overtime" so she was already getting f'd on her workload.  Now that she's having to carry the load for several other related positions on the same projects that got axed, now she's super f'd.<br><br>Anyone looking for a top-notch backup/sys admin with 20 years of experience and a drive to do things right the first time, ever time?  :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 12:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sure they can be taught how to program, but that doesn't mean they can efficiently apply that knowledge to systems that ends up being used in businesses around the world<br>--<br><br>So? The Programmers aren't the decision makers, they're the worker bees. They are the ones being outsourced. Not news. <br><br>And to a previous comment, are you going to wait 50 years for the wages in China to reach North American levels. What then? By then the Chinese and Indians will be outsourcing to South East Asia for cheaper labor (happening already, in pockets)<br><br>How does that help the US?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 12:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[For the record, I've had plenty of ¢rap handed down by AMERICAN two-bit "programmers"(they're not as rare as many here tend to imagine). <br><br>My company makes VLSI designs, and we've outsourced some of our designing and development to this company Wipro in India. More often than ones, the guys there have solved problems for us that we've found extremely challenging. <br><br>Of course ¢rappy two-bits are also there in India. One tends to get what one pays for, over there too. If people think that this is a myth that Indian technicians are bad, well, I can only suggest them that they take a reality pill. Indian companies are evermore being sought after, and we all better wake up to this. For starters, we can begin with the cleaning up of our school system.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Barrett]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 12:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[""Americans made the choice to skate through school, avoid the merest hint of math or science and spend much of their day surfing while on the job. US industry has been warning about this for over 20 years, now watch what happens when you have no technically competent people in today's world.<br><br>Read the quality of the writing on these comment pages and ask yourself how many you would hire. And this is a somewhat technical forum.""<br><br>Is this what they teach you in Anti-Americanism 101?  I've worked with services people all over the world and the services provided by motivated (well paid) American programmers and support technicians is the best in the world.  I repeatedly have to correct simple mistake made by Indian engineers, and as others have pointed out, they simply don't understand the way business works in the US or Europe and have no sense of urgency when working on a problem for a Fortune 5000 business.  I am regularly spammed by IMs from them asking me how to do their job.  Why should I help them when they are trying to learn enough to replace me.<br><br>I will gladly take anyone from the US with a CS or MIS degree over their Indian counterparts when it comes to doing technical work.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 12:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hate supporting other people's code for just this reason.  The consulting world is full of hack developers who's only job is to extend billable hours all the while creating steaming craploads of un-maintainable non-configurable code.  There's a website called www.thedailywtf.com (think it's changed its name now) that has a post a day about some new WTF someone has experienced in development/architecture.  It can get a bit java fan-boi-ish sometimes, but it's still usually an amusing read.<br><br>On the other hand, I've also dealt first hand with code coming out of India.  It's not usually very good.  It takes a very strong bi-lingual project manager on the client side to make things work.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 4:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[Where do you guys get this kind of crap...?IBM is not laying off 100k people. It simply doesn't make sense given their current business model. Also, for the person saying that US salaries are too high, this may be superficially true, but unless the statistics have changed, the American worker remains among the most productive in the world...<br>I agree that we are focusing less on science and technology, but I think this is to a large portion due to a decline in traditional American values of hard work etc.. More kids these days want to bairly get out of high school and then try and sell a rap record to someone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[deepmisc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 1:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA[ The Chinese have the capital. Looks like they are calling the shots now, without firing a single shot.<br> Not suprising though, when you think that most of u.s. nuclear technology and production  is now owned by mitsubishi of Japan.<br> ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pass.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 3:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM gearing up to lay off over 100000 American employees?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/05/ibm-gearing-up-to-layoff-over-100000-american-employees/</guid><description><![CDATA["Not suprising though, when you think that most of u.s. nuclear technology and production is now owned by mitsubishi of Japan."<br><br>Of course that's utterly false, but people will no doubt believe it.<br><br>*Sigh*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Schroeder]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 5:00PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
