<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for eStarling 2.0 WiFi digiframe gets larger, maintains price</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for eStarling 2.0 WiFi digiframe gets larger, maintains price</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on eStarling 2.0 WiFi digiframe gets larger, maintains price]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</guid><description><![CDATA[first comment.... this looks nice]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nomadicalloy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 11th 2007 5:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on eStarling 2.0 WiFi digiframe gets larger, maintains price]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've never seen the point in these things. I can never see myself owning a digital photo frame.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[S. Brown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 11th 2007 5:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on eStarling 2.0 WiFi digiframe gets larger, maintains price]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am not really impressed, a few months ago I would have been,or $100 cheaper..<br><br>The I-Mate momento comes in 7" ($199) and 10" ($299) via amazon.<br><br>For $50 more, the 10" momento is a much better option.<br><br>Basic specs <br>    *  Enhanced for Windows Vista™, Windows® XP compatible<br>    * 10.2" High resolution TFT 800x480 display<br>    * Wireless 802.11 b/g<br>    * SD/MMC/xD/SmartMedia/Memory Stick®, USB support<br>    * WMA, MP3, Audio Out<br>    * Built in storage for favorite pictures<br>    * Built in clock & calendar display mode<br>    * Landscape or portrait<br>    * Customizable slideshow<br>    * RF Remote included<br>    * Support for Windows® SideShow<br>    * MomentoLive capable<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[engadget.com]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 11th 2007 5:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on eStarling 2.0 WiFi digiframe gets larger, maintains price]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</guid><description><![CDATA[It seems to me that a short, wide (or tall, skinny depending on the orientation) is a pretty bad idea.  Analog picture frames have been shaped in the 4:3ish format for centuries for a reason, generally, so that you can see people.  The wide format is more for the purpose of watching movies or looking at landscapes so its use as a picture frame for, presumably, people, is ineffective because it will chop the tops of their head's off.  We have wide-format monitors and TVs for watching 16:9 movies... we don't have any use for an ineffective, expensive frame that hangs on the wall simply because 16:9 is the in-thing these days.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aeo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 11th 2007 5:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on eStarling 2.0 WiFi digiframe gets larger, maintains price]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hm.<br><br><a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/estarling-handson-update-buyer-beware-223990.php" rel="nofollow">http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/estarling-handson-update-buyer-beware-223990.php</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 11th 2007 5:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on eStarling 2.0 WiFi digiframe gets larger, maintains price]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</guid><description><![CDATA[What's with the resolution?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sygyzy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 11th 2007 6:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on eStarling 2.0 WiFi digiframe gets larger, maintains price]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</guid><description><![CDATA[The resolution is 480 x 234, as written in the text. That's a lower-end resolution, for a frame that is designed for high-end consumers. Sometimes I do not understant these digital photo frame manufacturers. Some try to make a high-end product and then take a cheap frame or the cheapest remote, and others try to make a low-end model and then put many extras on it.<br><br><a href="http://www.digital-photo-frame-market.info" rel="nofollow">http://www.digital-photo-frame-market.info</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hannes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 11th 2007 8:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on eStarling 2.0 WiFi digiframe gets larger, maintains price]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hannes - I understand what the resolution is. I can read. I was asking "what's up" with it as in it's so ridiculously poor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sygyzy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 12th 2007 5:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on eStarling 2.0 WiFi digiframe gets larger, maintains price]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd give it to that white chick.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[david]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 11th 2007 6:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on eStarling 2.0 WiFi digiframe gets larger, maintains price]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</guid><description><![CDATA[I bought the original one for my parents for Christmas last year. The resolution was SO BAD! I was apalled. That, and the wi-fi only worked within 15 feet of a base station. Needless to say, I promptly returned it.<br><br>What did they add with 2.0? Another crappy-res screen. Cell phones take higher res photos than that. This is just abysmal, even at that price.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 11th 2007 7:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on eStarling 2.0 WiFi digiframe gets larger, maintains price]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</guid><description><![CDATA[All these frames are ridiculously small.<br><br>I have made myself one with a 1440x900, 410x260mm panel (I suppose that's about 19 inches diagonally), and I wish that I had made it larger.<br><br>My challenge for this weekend is to find a way to hang it on the wall so that I can rotate it.  Something involving pulleys I think.  Any suggestions?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spam_from_engadget]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 11th 2007 6:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on eStarling 2.0 WiFi digiframe gets larger, maintains price]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</guid><description><![CDATA[According to eStarling, the v. 2.0 frame is also Mac compatible, contrary to your post.<br><br>Also, if folks are interested in eStarling's take on the problems with v. 1.0 and trying to fix them in this version, I did an interview with their exec. VP a few days ago: <a href="http://www.wirelesspictureframe.com/2007/05/08/interview-with-andrew-caffey-executive-vice-president-pf-digital/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wirelesspictureframe.com/2007/05/08/interview-with-andrew-caffey-executive-vice-president-pf-digital/</a> ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Costello]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 12th 2007 12:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on eStarling 2.0 WiFi digiframe gets larger, maintains price]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sorry. I got that wrong, didn't read the "with". You are right. The resolution is really poor. I don't understand that, because the other features are more for a high-end model, why do they use such a low-quality screen? As it is a 7-inch frame, it is also probably an analogue panel. The price for that panel is about 20$.<br><br><a href="http://www.digital-photo-frame-market.info" rel="nofollow">http://www.digital-photo-frame-market.info</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hannes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 12th 2007 9:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on eStarling 2.0 WiFi digiframe gets larger, maintains price]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/11/estarling-2-0-wifi-digiframe-gets-larger-maintains-price/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sure hope this one doesn't suck out loud like v1.0.  I'd ordered the first one as a gift for my parents...finally gave up on it a couple weeks ago, had it returned.  Bad programming, crap hardware, major quality control problems...<br><br>Think I'll wait before trying another version.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TrackZero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 14th 2007 1:41PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
