http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/ Engadget Comments for Regarding yesterday's Apple news http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/
(not that there's anything wrong with it)

point was, engadget came across looking a lot more amateurish than they usually are. i love the site, and usually they are spot-on - but - when you publish something with only one single source and no backup - then you take your chances. ryan said as much himself.

the impact of this was millions of dollars. now what would be interesting would be to see who was shorting apple stock for yesterday. that much money moving around benefited someone, the only question is who. was it just a slicker version of the typical pump & dump email scam?

so yeah, i stick by "eager."

and watch those teeth.]]>May 17th 2007 7:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/
Or do you just read the blogs and chime in when you can quote your favorite testosterone loaded movie heros.

The integrity displayed in the above blog entry alone is probably confusing you let alone any journalistic credibility.

That someone like you, who's breadth of phrasing would barely rival the hotest wrestler/action hero of our time, would question someones journalistic integrity is, in itself, comical.

You misspelled your name. I believe that should be a "t" not and "l". Your a putz
]]>May 18th 2007 5:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 7:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 7:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 19th 2007 12:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/
I just wanted to give you a super colossal amout of support. All of you @ Engadegt are doing a fantasict job.
Keep up the good stuff... We Love you guys.......

Oliver]]>May 18th 2007 1:21AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/
Common sense should have kicked in, but you left that at home that is if you ever had it.

A trip to Engadget is clearly a waste of key strokes

Cheers!
]]>May 18th 2007 6:53AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 7:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/
Hey- everybody makes mistakes. It's admitting to them that separates the reliable sources from those who aren't.]]>May 17th 2007 8:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/__________________
Stupid gizmodo never let me comment. Engadget rocks, gizmodo sucks. ]]>May 18th 2007 2:55AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 7:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 7:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 8:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/
The only people that lost are the fools that tried to jump ship at the first sign of trouble and dumped their stock. What a shame.]]>May 21st 2007 4:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 7:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/
Seriously, I can always forgive the media. Hahaha blogs are part of the media now. I think that was the most a blog ever moved a large cap stock. Go go inspector engadget.

Be careful, it seemed like trying to smoke out a mole to me... the press has freedom, and the courts just backed this up again, but Apple can then terminate the leakers.
]]>May 17th 2007 7:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/
Just throwing an idear out there

a]]>May 17th 2007 7:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 9:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/
You guys rock.]]>May 17th 2007 7:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 7:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 7:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 7:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/
And Engadget, don't sweat it. Mistakes like this happen all the time. Possibly not on such a large scale, but, you know...

:)]]>May 19th 2007 10:59AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/
That article won't affect how much I still like Engadget.]]>May 17th 2007 10:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/
It doesn't matter whether you know this person is an Apple employee or not...without independent verification, you shouldn't post the story. Verifying the person is an employee and verifying that the email was sent on the Apple network does not verify the content of the email and does not verify that Apple sent it. It is a fundamental difference.

Without that independent verification, all you have is rumor. Spreading rumors != journalism.


]]>May 18th 2007 10:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 7:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 18th 2007 12:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 7:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 7:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 9:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/
]]>May 17th 2007 7:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 19th 2007 2:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 7:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/
Were those one to three hours so important that they needed to information out there that fast? What would have changed in those one to three hours? Why the rush?]]>May 17th 2007 7:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 29th 2007 5:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/
Just the first to publish it without checking facts. Maybe checking facts is what the other sites were doing. You were too excited to be sitting on an exclusive and couldn't wait. I guess that's understandable. Although the words apologize or sorry aren't anywhere in this post. Maybe some Apple stock investors aren't too happy with Engadget today. Or Apple themselves.]]>May 17th 2007 7:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 7:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/
How did you lose money then? Sold stock after it went down considerably? Isn't that just about the dumbest thing to do in cases like this?]]>May 17th 2007 8:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/
We all now know that even rumours posted "with authority" can be false.]]>May 17th 2007 7:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 7:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 8:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 7:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/they're trying to weed out the mole.
but it didn't work so well since you didn't post THE specific memo, and more than one was confirmed to you.

lol, apple, your about as leak free as a colander.]]>May 17th 2007 8:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news//sarcasm]]>May 17th 2007 7:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/
Blogs in general, and especially Engadget, have totally changed the way we get and receive news. In terms of expertise, breadth of coverage, entertainment value and most of all, timeliness, you guys have totally changed the way we all get our gadget info. Just as an example of Engadget's relevance and importance, the site has been quoted and referenced often by the NY Times.

While I understand that you guys strive towards excellence, I think that we can accept the occasional misinformation and injection of personal feelings as you rush to publish something. In any case, I'd hardly expect an apology or ask for an explanation.

Please keep doing what you've always done!]]>May 18th 2007 1:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/
The miswritten meaning will fuel fires of "misreporting" accusations, so be more careful, please.

Sorry about your hot water. On the bright side, stock is where it was and the iPhone isn't delayed.

If someone else already wrote about this, I am sorry for not reading all the comments before posting. ]]>May 17th 2007 7:57PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 8:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 11:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 8:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/May 17th 2007 8:01PM