http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/ Engadget Comments for Is this the first quad-core laptop? http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/May 18th 2007 1:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/
Seriously, Quad Core Enabled. Is that as opposed to other laptops have have those extra two cores disabled?

This whole "enabled" and "equipped" this is really getting on my nerves.]]>May 18th 2007 1:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/
BTW between a quadcore cpu and dual 8800 this thing is going to be hurting for juice like no other. I find it very hard to believe right now.]]>May 18th 2007 2:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/May 18th 2007 2:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/
Yes must not only have 17"+ screen but they should have True-Desktop-Keyboard, i repeat, not equal in number of keys but equal inlayout aswell. Though somenotebokos give num-pad seperate but still nav-keys and 9-keys above it are blended with the num-pad, its pad, there keyboards should be ditto same 3-region layout. yes that keaboard will require 18" to 20" and the 19" screen is diagonally 19", notebook maker just has to shrink the keyboard wisely, not change the layout.

Here this opens door a new buisness. some keyboard makers shuold introduce True-Keyboard for notebook so even if a notebook doesnt provide desired layout one could just buy compatible True-Keyboard for his noteboko and replace it.]]>May 20th 2007 5:41AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/
Since AMD has developed flavour to eat bread crums from flour. They have just gone low

first by FANTASISING that Intel Quasi-Quad approach rather True-Quad is bad. And it (AMD) will be saving humanity like Apple, by pulling out B-Pod (Barcelona) out jeans pocket near Dec-2007.

Then by never pushing AM2 platform on Notebook, says AMD: thats bad bad not angelic way... so we are still seing 2-years old crapy 4800-X2 or FX-60 Notebooks, if they were loosing against Core2Duo on Desktops they should have open front on Notebooks with 6000-X2 notebooks atleast promoting AM2 on notebooks.

Then shamelessly pushing date ahead and ahead and ahead

Not listening to there favourite patetion style www.amd.com/duel. When i saw that flash video humiliating Intel i got a shiver why this cheap style if Apple would have been doing that no surprise, why AMD is doing this. AMD then cashed the fans then but now why didnt they listen to countless patetions from people and through many articles hiden in them in a wise manner by theinquirer.net all from Nov-2006 to now. Intel didnt uploaded any page for patetion to show up with X2-6000+

Someone should re engineer that www.amd.com/duel video and maje it like dell-cartoon-video so my beloved AMD could snapp out of this Apple-O'-phobia. AMD should better Launch Agena at worst by next month and rather going for S1 stunts for Turion they should atleast with same fervour, flock/pleague the enthusiast notebooks class.

I have persuing monster like these, to lay in my lap since Nov-2006
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=120142&page=3 (see this Page-3 of my post)]]>May 18th 2007 2:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/
Wait, what are you saying? I have no idea.]]>May 18th 2007 2:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/May 21st 2007 2:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/
Thats is why we vitnessed the dawn of Clevo-D900C (and its sager, prostar, eurocom, xoticpc clones) and the ASUS C90S and now this Quad-Core notebook knocking AMD either ignorant or complete pants down.

I am not fixing a timeline that AMD must out Agena-Notebook/Desktops by next month i am saying after doing www.amd.com/duel style patetioning now from the of Fans & theinquirer.net towards AMD this month or next is a closing door for AMD to say we got 6months lead (nov-2006 they could get 1-year lead) over penryn (performance wise) now any month FANs can dump Agena in protest of betraying and in protest they will prefer to go for Penryn. Only R600 would keep them surviving just enough to keep eating bread crumps from the floor, Intel droped will gulping the feast of both enthusist Notebooks and Desktops. Thats why i am asking they way to snap AMD out of this is to turn there own www.amd.com/duel video into Dell-Cartoon style but a Patetion.
]]>May 19th 2007 5:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/
Thats is why we vitnessed the dawn of Clevo-D900C (and its sager, prostar, eurocom, xoticpc clones) and the ASUS C90S and now this Quad-Core notebook knocking AMD completely by surprise.

I am not fixing a timeline that AMD must out Agena-Notebook/Desktops by next month i am saying after doing www.amd.com/duel style patetioning now from the of Fans & theinquirer.net towards AMD this month or next is a closing door for AMD to say we got 6months lead (nov-2006 they could get 1-year lead) over penryn (performance wise) now any month FANs can dump Agena in protest of betraying and in protest they will prefer to go for Penryn. Only R600 would keep them surviving just enough to keep eating bread crumps from the floor, Intel droped will gulping the feast of both enthusist Notebooks and Desktops. Thats why i am asking they way to snap AMD out of this is to turn there own www.amd.com/duel video into Dell-Cartoon style but a Patetion.
]]>May 19th 2007 5:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/May 18th 2007 2:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/
At least give the laptop at 19".

These pictures are a load of crap.]]>May 18th 2007 4:08PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/May 18th 2007 4:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/
The Q6600 is a 95W part, three times as much power and heat as a Merom processor. It could probably be done, but calling the result a "laptop" would be a bit disingenuous. ]]>May 18th 2007 4:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/May 21st 2007 12:56PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/May 18th 2007 5:57PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/May 18th 2007 6:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/With stock 8800 running in the 70s on a well cooled desktop it would in the high 90s on stock load. Running into 100s once OC'd. With the dual and the quad core everything would FRY before you can use anything. Besides what AC adapter can carry that much amps to all that. A good system needs high amps on the 12V rails. This is nearly impossible to have in a small AC adapter that doesn't cool.

Point is not happening.

P.S. The article you linked in the story about the other laptop with 8800 is incorrect and needs to be fixed. ]]>May 18th 2007 7:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/May 18th 2007 9:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/
http://www.iwantto.us]]>May 19th 2007 12:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/May 19th 2007 1:31AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/
Duplicate posts do not help.]]>May 19th 2007 7:35AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/
Seeing that it has 2 MXM slots, and 3 fans, it looks legit. But if it's anything like the Core 2 EXTREME SLI 7950GTX 17" laptops, then it's gunna run pretty hot, but not burning hot, oh, and the >1 hour battery life! Might as well buy a desktop! Unless your rich.]]>May 19th 2007 5:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/May 19th 2007 5:40AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/18/is-this-the-first-quad-core-laptop/
I am not fixing a timeline that AMD must out Agena-Notebook/Desktops by next month. I am saying after doing www.amd.com/duel style patetioning now from upon the Shoulders of AMD-Fans ......& now not listening to theinquirer.net's polight wise manner to be quick... This month or next month will be a closing door for AMD to say we got 6months lead (nov-2006 they could get 1-year lead) over penryn (performance wise) now any month AMD FAN-ATICS can dump Agena in protest of betraying and in protest (e.g. were cashed with www.amd.com/duel petioning signups) they will prefer to go for Penryn. And what is AMD trying to pretend with feature wise handycaped variants of R600, R600 doesnt have UVD, Broke 2600XT in three avriants denying highest variant (kohinoor) of HDMI and those which have HDMI doesnt have VI just VO (VIVO)??? What is AMD trying to pretend??? that they are on front foot, not hand to mouth, not fasting to save food. AMD should clear it thoughts that this product is that one that would keep AMD surviving just enough to keep eating bread crumps from the floor, which Intel droped while gulping the feast of both enthusist Notebooks and Desktops. Thats why i am asking they way to snap AMD out of this is to turn there own www.amd.com/duel video into Dell-Cartoon style Patetioning.

I also guess there are Intel's Gestapo's inside AMD(Dresden Germany) and AMD should hunt them, seriously cuz the delays and of Agena and handycaping R600 points that there are hawks in AMD ranks who are secretly/unnoticeably doing sabotages.

P.S:
William Gibson for me!?! :)]]>May 26th 2007 1:38PM