<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[I thought we were waiting on an Xbox360/AT&T IPTV deal?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 2:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seriously - wouldn't Apple need to license some of the technology from Microsoft, since it's Microsoft's IPTV system?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erwos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 3:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Failed ad campaign for the Apple IPTV:<br><br>"For those who eat and drink TV - now you can PTV too."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[blackfeather]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 3:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[@blackfeather<br><br>hahahaha! I can't wait to see the commercials for that one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[carlo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 3:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[I heard that IPTV for the Xbox 360 will be coming in Fall 2007. Based on what I've seen, it looks amazing. I don't see how AT&T/Apple can do any better. Here's the video link to remind you of what IPTV/Xbox360 looks like:<br><br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gwvb7v_yckg" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gwvb7v_yckg</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 3:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[I bet they won't do that with Apple TV, because it is "hackable". Most likely Motorolla or Cisco-SciAtlanta box will do IPTV for At&t]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Emre Aydinceren]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 3:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Didn't Steve just say that they didn't want to get into this business?<br><br>Walt: But it's a set-top box...<br><br>Steve:<br>No, we've wanted to do this for a few years. But we thought of this as a set-top box replacement. The minute you have an STB you have gnarly issues, CableCARD, OCAP... that just isn't something we would choose to do ourselves. We couldn't see a go-to-market strategy that makes sense. But wait, there are a lot more DVD players than STBs, we just want to be a new DVD player for the internet age. And that's what we can be. So our model for the Apple TV is like a DVD player for the internet.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 3:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[hmmm. Not going to happen. The whole U Verse/ project lightspeed is based on ALcatel's triple Play end to end solution which also inludes MS IPtv software. I doubt they would let it run on Apple TV.  As well the current AT&T PVR platform for ipTV is Motorola... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chuco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 4:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mark my words - Apple TV is a stealth product.  The interface is brilliant and it is very, very extensible. We currently have two - it is the first 'geeky' product we've ever owned that my spouse actually uses. (Trust me, an Xbox will *never* have the same appeal).  <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 3:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mark my words - Apple TV is a stealth product. The interface is brilliant and it is very, very extensible. We currently have two - it is the first 'geeky' product we've ever owned that my spouse actually uses<br><br>I'll 2nd that * ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 8:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow this is surprising because AT&T currently uses the Microsoft IPTV product. The MS IPTV is a big infrastructure thats a lot of investment to throw away if this is a full blown satellite/cable competitor and if its not that its seems kind of odd to have a mixed ecosystem like that]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 3:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Live content on the Apple TV is one of the critical factors in its long-term success. I think this is great news.<br><br>An Apple TV manifesto here: <br><a href="http://techshouldwork.blogspot.com/2007/04/how-apple-tv-should-work.html" rel="nofollow">http://techshouldwork.blogspot.com/2007/04/how-apple-tv-should-work.html</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Thompson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 3:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[IPTV and Cablcard ready STBs are different. I think this is a great idea. I would love to have Apple TV be a home for all my TV, home movies, music, photos and Youtube.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 3:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[1) they never said it was using U Verse, Engadget is guessing on that part and <br><br>2) the only issue I see if a DVR function, I doubt Apple with allow DVR if they are also selling some of these shows on iTunes. unless its recordable for limited time. <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple doesn't need to add DVR to Apple TV soon, as Elgato and Miglia make devices that do that with a Mac or PC. The EyeTV2 software can automatically convert recorded videos for the AppleTV and load them into iTunes for transfer. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[G Slusher]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 4:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[sigh ATT shacking up with apple again...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kbs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 4:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA["AT&T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?"<br>Yeah.. and Leopard is delayed until 2008 too ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brendan Sheehan jnr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 4:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree but I'm sure Apple doesn't like the idea of recording to iTunes for playback when they want to sell you the episode instead. I would like a DVR function but its not make or break for me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 4:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yesterday on the last Apple TV commercial, er, article here on Engadget, when people made a few comparisons to MCE and 360, the Apple fans were having a fit about how you can't comare the two because they are not in the same market. I think if true and not the usual "some random person mentioned IPTV would be great on an Apple TV" and so now Apple will be doing it rumor, this puts them very much in the same market. Now, Apple boys, do we have your permission to start comparing prices, functionality, etc?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cs32]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 4:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not until the IPTV is rolled out for both devices. Neither of them are currently positioned as IPTV-centric devices (for good reason - no one would spend $300+ on such a thing). The 360 is primarily a game machine and the AppleTV is primarily a tethered iPod. IPTV will take a while to become important to either device. The difference will continue to be that AppleTV is marketed as a media playback device, which is why people will buy it, even if other functions (such as games) are available. IPTV fits nicely with that as another type of media to play back.<br><br>Xbox 360 is primarily a gaming device, and it seems pretty unlikely that anyone would buy one who is not a gamer, no matter how much media functionality MS piles onto it. (I'm a gamer, and I like the 360, including its media functionality. But I would never reccommend it to my non-gamer friends who just wanted the media. It would confuse the heck out of them.)<br><br>So you may compare IPTV or other media feature sets, but just be congniscent that the devices are targeting different markets, and adding IPTV serves a different purpose for each company.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 4:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Re. Microsoft vs. Apple<br><br>Guys, Microsoft doesn't sell IPTV STBs.  In current U-Verse deployments the Microsoft STB software goes on Motorola or Scientific Atlanta or other vendor's STBs.  Microsoft gets money for the software.  If AT&T deploys IPTV over Apple TV it would still use Microsoft software (perhaps written in Java?) and all of the Microsoft IPTV back-end servers and Microsoft software would still be used.  Microsoft would make just as much money as in a traditional IPTV deployment.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 5:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why bother with IPTV on AppleTV when the thing doesn't even support HD video? The XBOX360 is much better platform for IPTV.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[djmattyb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 5:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA["Why bother with IPTV on AppleTV when the thing doesn't even support HD video? The XBOX360 is much better platform for IPTV."<br>AppleTV supports 720P -- since when is that not HD video?  (And I don't necessarily see a physical limitation keeping it from supporting 1080i either -- Apple could probably turn it on with a software update).  As for which is the better platform, lets wait until this is more than vaporware, then it will be easier to judge.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted T.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 6:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[I thought Apple was doing something with Miglia? HD PVR antenna type built in?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Lyon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 6:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Apple TV is boring technology. It's stupidly tethered to iTunes a computer and the iTunes store. Who needs all that crap. The world of entertainment will is being built on RSS and you're all going gaga over this peice of crap. The future of TV and entertainment of the web is going to be built on RSS Channels not some silly IP TV crap. Anyone that's been using the PSP for a while to stream podcast and download video will know this already.<br><br>When the next Major PS3 firmware updates rolls out, RSS will become the platform that future media will be built on. I seem to recall that it does 1080p. Then you can use Yahoo Pipes to roll your own TV channel. The days of EPG and IPTV are long gone. I've seen the future and it's not what you all think. The Cable and Satelite guys are in trouble. They know it. Apple's paradigm is transient. It's no different from the cable guys. Media shifting is where it's at.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[poseidongroove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 7:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am a mac user have a macbook pro 2.33 but in all honesty the combination of the 360 & media center pc is by far the most excellent combination you possibly have in your home theater.<br><br>The apple tv is so limited and useless, you really cant compare both based on functionality. <br>I dont doubt somethign great will eventually evolve out of this project. But evolution never stops and mce is light years beyond the walls of apples intelligence in the media integration dpt.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GenNove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2007 8:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[To clarify the IPTV service. AT&T pays for, manages, & has setup the direct feeds from the TV networks & then encodes each channel at the VHO (such as Kansas City) with h.264 compression (they also add in the local feeds too). Then they multicasts the channel feeds (on different IP's) over DWDM to each of the AT&T Central Offices which feeds FTTH & FTTN endusers. Microsoft does have thier software in the set top boxes to decode & uncompress the IP video streams which is customized for AT&T since they contracted with them to write software (to break out the h.264?? not VC1 - IP streams/feeds) for the settop boxes. I would imagine AT&T could contract whoever such as Apple TV to breakout the IP streams off AT&T's feed (network). After all the h.264 would line up with Quicktime which Apple has on the iPhone, iTunes, & Apple TV.  I don't think the user interface will be like Microsoft's gui they have for the Uverse menu since everything else that Apple does (like it or not) they work hard to be the best & stay ahead of everyone else. This might get Microsoft & Apple competing for a better set top box experience or maybe just a different approach on how to get AT&T Uverse into peoples homes. Either way I think everyone will benefit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sojourn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2007 1:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[IPTV has been around for a while, without getting critical mass be it in the US or Europe, Asia is another story.<br>Until the bandwidth increases 5 fold and the price drops by half the adoption rates for any bandwidth hogging applications like IPTV or Internet Download services for Movies will at the most remain niche. The hype shall continue from the geeks who have to feel the need to justify their purchase of such toys.<br>For the foreseeable future Walmart will still be a core distributor of DVD's and Netflix will continue to thrive. <br>Verizon has chosen the FTTH option and states it is committed to deploying it over the next 10 years spending close to $20 billion.<br>Yet the stock price for Verizon has not shifted much i.e. the Street expects that Verizon needs to spend this money to stay alive or loose out to the Cable companies.<br>Apple TV may have features that are great and gorgeous yet it is not for the moment bringing in 10% or more of the revenues for Apple. Ipod's have been helping hold up Apple stock the last several years and possibly for another couple of years before that market taps out as well.<br>As such adding services is what Apple sees as a way to sustain revenues thus Youtube on Apple TV and possibly IPTV on Apple TV. But this plan will not sustain itself as the crucial bandwidth issues aren't controlled by Apple.<br>Wait for more service offerings to be paired with this product as a means to try and make it viable. For now it is a very very small niche.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[whoindatgarden]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2007 10:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[I do not see this as a big positive for AT&T; more like a last ditch attempt since LightSpeed is not going to be as successful as FiOS/ CableCos triple play offerings. If LightSpeed is not scaling up, AT&T can use this as a stop-gap arrangement to provide their customers with TV content provided over the internet, with the added allure of an Apple product. AT&T has a Blue Run internet video content site and the this joint offering should include that content too. Someone like a Verizon or the CableCos do not require this since their network will have the bandwidth to do all kinds of things and have a huge database of VOD content.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sajith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2007 11:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Steve - <br>12:48pm - "Works fine off cable modem -- works even better on 100mbit fiber optic networks I hear people have. "<br><br>Perhaps this is a referance to IPTV with ATT?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GBaz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2007 2:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T planning IPTV for Apple TV in 2008?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/atandt-planning-iptv-for-apple-tv-in-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[AT&T's "Project Lightspeed" includes both a fiber to the home (FFTH) deployment in some areas along with also utilizing the fiber to the node (FTTN - where the phone/DSL/IPTV is sent over existing copper twisted pair(s) ) buildout in most areas. Some blogs complain how AT&T isn't bringing fiber to the home when they actually are in some areas but to get the most amount of AT&T local telephone customers "in the green" to get their Uverse IPTV service a decision was made to do a higher percentage of FTTN deployments over the amount of FTTH deployments. For those who want fast ethernet bandwidth AT&T does offer: 100Mbps (OPT-E-MAN), 1 gigabit per sec (GigaMAN), & 10 gigabits per sec (DecaMAN) although I am content with $19.95 DSL]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sojourn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 2nd 2007 3:48AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
