<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for LaCie's Ethernet Big Disk NAS hits 2TB</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/lacies-ethernet-big-disk-nas-hits-2tb/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for LaCie's Ethernet Big Disk NAS hits 2TB</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LaCie's Ethernet Big Disk NAS hits 2TB]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/lacies-ethernet-big-disk-nas-hits-2tb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/lacies-ethernet-big-disk-nas-hits-2tb/</guid><description><![CDATA[iSCSI would be nice on some of these drives.  Some day....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Dehnert Sr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2007 12:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LaCie's Ethernet Big Disk NAS hits 2TB]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/lacies-ethernet-big-disk-nas-hits-2tb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/lacies-ethernet-big-disk-nas-hits-2tb/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll have the roast Duck with the Mango Salsa...<br>And I don't have much of an appetite, thank you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaylon Clark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2007 3:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LaCie's Ethernet Big Disk NAS hits 2TB]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/lacies-ethernet-big-disk-nas-hits-2tb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/lacies-ethernet-big-disk-nas-hits-2tb/</guid><description><![CDATA[He doesn't say "and," you retard.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2007 7:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LaCie's Ethernet Big Disk NAS hits 2TB]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/lacies-ethernet-big-disk-nas-hits-2tb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/lacies-ethernet-big-disk-nas-hits-2tb/</guid><description><![CDATA[For 2TB of storage $1,099 is stiff? Damn cheap if you ask me. 7 years ago we paid around $1,500 for a 60gb NAS.<br>Cheers!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Budd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2007 8:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LaCie's Ethernet Big Disk NAS hits 2TB]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/lacies-ethernet-big-disk-nas-hits-2tb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/lacies-ethernet-big-disk-nas-hits-2tb/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes and 14 years ago we had to pay $50,000 for storage that we actually had to *plug in to our server*.  The horror!<br><br>Storage cost per gigabyte decreases by like half every year so what does the cost 7 years ago matter at all?  <br><br>Especially when I can get the Buffalo with RAID for the same price:<br><a href="http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=933011" rel="nofollow">http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=933011</a><br><br>Or the slightly more feature rich MicroNet dealie for a little more:<br><a href="http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=947946" rel="nofollow">http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=947946</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Shmoe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2007 12:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LaCie's Ethernet Big Disk NAS hits 2TB]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/lacies-ethernet-big-disk-nas-hits-2tb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/lacies-ethernet-big-disk-nas-hits-2tb/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, and I paid over $6000 in 1991 for me 1st 486-33 with a 250mb drive. Me point was that in my book it's a fair price, not what I'd call 'stiff'. Best deal in that price range? Nope, but still not bad.<br><br>And what's with the Micronet specing 'compatible' OS's? If it and you have network access and you are able to map to network drive and it's control consol is web-based (I assume), what does the OS have to do with it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Budd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2007 1:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LaCie's Ethernet Big Disk NAS hits 2TB]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/lacies-ethernet-big-disk-nas-hits-2tb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/lacies-ethernet-big-disk-nas-hits-2tb/</guid><description><![CDATA[I dunno.  Buffalo specs the compatible OS's too  In their case it's only "Compatibility	PC"<br><br>It's probably an artifact of CDW's page design.  Looking at both Buffalo and MicroNet's sites, they call it OS Support, which IMO is distinctly different than 'compatibility'.  It at least implies that they offer troubleshooting for those platforms.<br><br>The LaCie also has such a section and it's much larger than either of their competitors, although I can't imagine how many Windows98 users they're actually taking calls from...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Shmoe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2007 2:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LaCie's Ethernet Big Disk NAS hits 2TB]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/lacies-ethernet-big-disk-nas-hits-2tb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/31/lacies-ethernet-big-disk-nas-hits-2tb/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, I still runs OS/2 Warp on all my main systems.... Solid as a rock, never any virus issues :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Budd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2007 4:03PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
