<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Panasonic's Lumix DMC-FS2: another ho-hum 7.2 megapixel shooter</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/04/panasonics-lumix-dmc-fs2-another-ho-hum-7-2-megapixel-shooter/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Panasonic's Lumix DMC-FS2: another ho-hum 7.2 megapixel shooter</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's Lumix DMC-FS2: another ho-hum 7.2 megapixel shooter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/04/panasonics-lumix-dmc-fs2-another-ho-hum-7-2-megapixel-shooter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/04/panasonics-lumix-dmc-fs2-another-ho-hum-7-2-megapixel-shooter/</guid><description><![CDATA[HOW many more useless cameras are there guys going to make?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GADGETGUY]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2007 9:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's Lumix DMC-FS2: another ho-hum 7.2 megapixel shooter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/04/panasonics-lumix-dmc-fs2-another-ho-hum-7-2-megapixel-shooter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/04/panasonics-lumix-dmc-fs2-another-ho-hum-7-2-megapixel-shooter/</guid><description><![CDATA[At least it has true image stabilization, and is a nice Leica lens.  I'd buy one for $199, but I imagine it will retail for more.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2007 9:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's Lumix DMC-FS2: another ho-hum 7.2 megapixel shooter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/04/panasonics-lumix-dmc-fs2-another-ho-hum-7-2-megapixel-shooter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/04/panasonics-lumix-dmc-fs2-another-ho-hum-7-2-megapixel-shooter/</guid><description><![CDATA[so do you have a picture after it transforms?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[noazark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2007 9:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's Lumix DMC-FS2: another ho-hum 7.2 megapixel shooter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/04/panasonics-lumix-dmc-fs2-another-ho-hum-7-2-megapixel-shooter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/04/panasonics-lumix-dmc-fs2-another-ho-hum-7-2-megapixel-shooter/</guid><description><![CDATA[If it is so dull and average, why post it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfticket]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2007 5:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's Lumix DMC-FS2: another ho-hum 7.2 megapixel shooter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/04/panasonics-lumix-dmc-fs2-another-ho-hum-7-2-megapixel-shooter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/04/panasonics-lumix-dmc-fs2-another-ho-hum-7-2-megapixel-shooter/</guid><description><![CDATA[What would  be really exciting is if they made it a 15 megapixel camera! Who cares if the lens only can deliver an image sharp enough to warrant a 5 megapixel sensor, and the image looks crappier than 3 year old cameras, consumers like big numbers!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2007 10:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's Lumix DMC-FS2: another ho-hum 7.2 megapixel shooter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/04/panasonics-lumix-dmc-fs2-another-ho-hum-7-2-megapixel-shooter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/04/panasonics-lumix-dmc-fs2-another-ho-hum-7-2-megapixel-shooter/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm having a hard time seeing any difference between this and the already released FX-12.  Specs seem identical, camera body seems identical.  I don't see an annoucement for this camera on any of the common photography sites (dpreview, dcresource, etc) Is it the same camera?<br><br>"I'd buy one for $199, but I imagine it will retail for more."<br><br>The FX-12 can be had sub $200.  This camera is fairly small, but it's a bit shy of ultra-compact status, and the LCD is fairly low res (112k pixels)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joelm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2007 2:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic's Lumix DMC-FS2: another ho-hum 7.2 megapixel shooter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/04/panasonics-lumix-dmc-fs2-another-ho-hum-7-2-megapixel-shooter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/04/panasonics-lumix-dmc-fs2-another-ho-hum-7-2-megapixel-shooter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Addendum: looking at the dimensions, it actually could be considered an ultra-compact. (94 x 51 x 24 mm)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joelm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2007 2:21PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
